Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why not Feingold for VP?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
redsoxrudy Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:54 PM
Original message
Why not Feingold for VP?
I cannot for the life of think of why Russ Feingold wasn't at least included on the VP short list. Yes he will be vilified for being to liberal but, that criticism is going to happen no matter who is put in the VP slot. He is a popular Senator from a swing state. Wisconsin was very close in 2004 in the Presidential race but Russ won the state by a larger margin than Kerry did. He also would fit into the message of change and bi-partisanship, though very liberal he will work with Repubs when it does not compromise his core principals. In the beginning of W's first term before his appointees were exposed as the incompetent crooks that they are Russ voted to approve even hard fought cabinet positions. Saying the president should be able to have his people working for him. Later on he fought the retreads like Condi and Alberto after they had shown their disdain for the rule of law. So somebody please explain why Russ isn't at least in the running. The only thing I can think of is that he is recently divorced and there is dirt on him from that. However when he won reelection in 2004 it was either during or right after his divorce and I'm sure they would have used any dirt they had on him. Most press reports said it was an amicable divorce. So what gives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love Feingold but hasn't he been divorced twice?
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 02:55 PM by LSparkle
Not that both weren't amicable but ... just wondering since I thought
I'd heard that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yes, that's true
But the same can be said for Jim Webb. I think anybody who wouldn't vote for an otherwise excellent candidate because of that wouldn't vote for the candidate anyway.

Another factor in favor of Russ is that having a Jew on the ticket would balance out Joe Lieberman when McCain chooses him. Robert Wexler, another possibility who has been mentioned, could also fill that role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. We need Feingold in the Senate -- Wexler would be GREAT ...
He's got the same feisty spirit as Feingold (could fill the
ATTACK DOG shoes of a VP candidate), he's been very involved
with election issues ... and he'd be a great help in Florida
(which continues to be a critical state).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wanted him for President - still do! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's clear he doesn't want to be V.P.
judging by how he didn't even consider running for President. He seemed to be personally opposed to the job and loves his job in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Feingold has said he would consider being a VP running mate:
http://www.lacrossetribune.com/articles/2006/11/21/news/02feingold21.txt

Although it is not from the last 5 minutes, but from November of 2006:

U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold admitted Monday he’d have to seriously think about it if asked to be a presidential running mate.


Even if Feingold is willing I do not see him bringing anything much needed to the ticket. On a selfish note, I kind of like keeping him as my senator and I am sure he will be reelected here for as long as he wants to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. He'd be my first pick if it was up to me.
Which it isn't. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm a fan but he probably has his own reasons for not running. If he were interested
or thought he could pass the vetting I would think he would've run for president. It's been awhile since I lived in Wisconsin, but my 65-yr old mother in the Fox River Valley reports that she voted for Obama in the primary and is looking forward to the election. She thinks Wisconsin will go dem again because the economy is so bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Two senators on the ticket = McLoon landslide
Doesn't matter whether it's Feingold or Feinstein.

But for the record, I like Feingold a Hell of a lot more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not included because out-of-step with the corporate, war-mongering party leaders.
Russ is a gem, but then so is Dennis, and so was Paul Wellstone.

Gems don't go far in today's party for reasons that are less than mysterious. The party is consecrated to serving corporate power and operating the same war economy that the GOP does. Hence the loathsome right wing Lieberman as Gore's pick. Or the lobbyist's friend, John Kerry, prancing around like GI Joe, all gung ho to fight the exciting Iraq war, in 2004.

In what way could Russ or Dennis (or Paul, RIP) be of use to such goals? They're tolerated, but each is kept on a very short leash. And they will never, ever rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC