Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans Gird for Big Losses in Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:04 PM
Original message
Republicans Gird for Big Losses in Congress
The Wall Street Journal

Republicans Gird for Big Losses in Congress
By SARAH LUECK
June 11, 2008; Page A5

WASHINGTON -- Republicans are bracing for double-digit losses in the House and the prospect of four or five losses in the Senate, as they fight to hold a wide range of districts and states normally seen as safe for them, from Alaska and Colorado to Mississippi and North Carolina. The feared setback for Republicans, coming two years after their 2006 drubbing, is unusual for several reasons. It is rare for a party to lose two election cycles in a row. And many expect losses even if their presidential candidate, John McCain, captures the White House.

Democrats already hold majorities in the Senate and House. Democrats hold 49 seats in the Senate, and they often have the votes of the chamber's two independents. In the House, Democrats have 235 seats compared with 199 for Republicans. But a wider margin of control in both chambers would give the party a more workable majority, a change that would let it push more ambitious agendas on health care, energy policy and tax issues. While Democrats are already able to pass much of their agenda through the House, many of those bills currently get stuck in the Senate. A handful more seats in that chamber would give Democrats a better chance of overcoming filibusters, which require 60 votes to break.

(snip)

Already this year, Republicans have lost three House seats in special elections in Republican-leaning districts, an alarm bell for many in the party as they strategize for campaign season. The dynamics at work: voters' sharply negative views of President Bush and dismal feelings about the direction of the country, including rising oil and gas prices, a weak economy and fallout from the housing crisis. Even though Congress continues to register low approval ratings, voters overall appear to prefer putting Democrats in charge. Much remains fluid in the five months that remain until Election Day, and the presidential contest between Barack Obama and Sen. McCain might sway the outcomes of House and Senate races. Republicans are hoping Sen. McCain will aid their appeal to independents and the white, working-class voters who remain leery of Sen. Obama. Sen. McCain also will deflect attention from Mr. Bush.

(snip)

But, many Republicans say privately that, barring a huge gaffe by Sen. Obama, they have little hope of holding their current numbers, much less gaining ground. Sen. John Ensign of Nevada, who is heading Senate Republicans' re-election effort, recently told the Las Vegas Review-Journal that it would be "a great night" if his party can hold Democratic pickups in the Senate to three or four seats in November.

(snip)

Beyond the political dynamics, Senate Republicans have the handicap of far more seats to defend than Democrats do, because they won far more seats in 2002, when the climate was more favorable to the party. And they have more incumbents retiring. "There are 23 states that we're defending compared to their 12," said Rebecca Fisher, a spokeswoman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee. "We're in a defensive crouch."

(snip)

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121314230267962603.html (subscription)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. How sweet it will be....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yahoo! Another WSJ article that makes my heart glad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. As have been pointed out several times on these pages
the news department of the WSJ is excellent. The editorial pages, on the other hand deliver what they are expected to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Didn't Murdoch buy the WSJ not long ago?
If so, how long can we expect the news department to remain unbiased?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. So far, so good
The only changes that he made, so far, is to add a place for national and international stories from the wire services.

Even he should realize that changing the quality of the news will cost with a loss of subscribers. When the news first came out, that he was interested in buying it, I was surprised to read so many reactions online from people who said they would cancel their subscription, that they did not need another Daily News, that they did not care for the editorials but liked the stories.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. IMO, Murdoch probably sees it as more profitable to not ruin the Wall Street Journal
He already has FAUX News and the New York Post which are mostly read and watched by morons that are easily susceptible to brainwashing. The Wall Street Journal appeals to a more educated demographic. He probably figures that if he doesn't touch the news content he can get more liberals and moderates to read it and that means more money for him. He probably gave money to the Clintons to attract liberal and moderate readers as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. In the words of the Chinese chopper commander from Command & Conquer:
"We're going to ruin somebody's day...heh heh heh."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just how big will BIG be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. i am almost hopeful that my incumbent awful rep will be defeated by an excellent democrat in Novembe
i'll be walking my town for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Would one be naive
in thinking that members of the party of integrity and responsibility will look in the mirror to find the reason(s) for their current plight? Hey think of this post as a Thursday afternoon reason to chuckle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. If this happens we need to install a new senate leader.
Reid is too close with Lieberman and will never remove him from his chairmanships. This effectively leaves a repub in charge of a senate committee.

Let the weasel caucus with the repubs and let us get back to working on Democratic initiatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Amen. Time to get rid of Harry, and way past time to dump LIEberman...
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Dodd would be my suggestion (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Dodd, Levin, Boxer, Feingold, etc...
There's no shortage of good choices for the position. The major considerations are their willingness to fighthard for Democratic values and ability to communicate those values to the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Let's work hard to make it happen this way.
Then celebrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. I really hope that Musgrave gets her a** kicked in a major blowout
I hope its true that she will be running against Eidsness. Angie Paccione was a lost cause back in 2006. It will be great to vote for Eidsness again if he will be the Democrat on the ticket this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thanks for reminding
Now that I'm rolling in paycheck money, I need to give a bit to RICK NORIEGA for Texas Senate:

http://www.ricknoriega.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC