Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Economist trashes economists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 03:06 PM
Original message
Economist trashes economists
On McCain's conference call today, advisor Douglas Holtz-Eakin echoed a line from Hillary Clinton's push to suspend the gas tax:

“You can stack all the economists end to end and still not find common sense," he said.

Holtz-Eakin, it's pointed out to me, ought to know, as he himself is a member of that despited class.

The first three words of his official biography are: "World-class economist."

Worse still: He has a PhD. from Princeton, also known as Krugman U.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/Economist_trashes_economists.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's called the dismal science ... economists trash economists for sport and profit n/t
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 03:11 PM by Fredda Weinberg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. hey, economists as a class are wide open for "trashing"
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 03:30 PM by enki23
what with the fact that the profession appears to be dominated (at least at the top levels) by right-wing ideologues. but in this case, they have a point. this is political posturing, not a serious attempt to fix the problem. if they wanted to do something that was *certain* to have the effect they desire, why couldn't they simply impose a price ceiling for the summer? not politically popular with the conservative crowd, but it would be short lived, right? and it wouldn't effectively short the government of already-allocated and direly-needed revenue. maybe index it to the cost of crude to avoid the worst of any problems you might cause to trickle back up the supply chain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC