Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tweety: How Does He Connect With the White Guy.. the Regular People?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:28 PM
Original message
Tweety: How Does He Connect With the White Guy.. the Regular People?
OMG.. is this where we're at.. STILL??

I've admittedly taken a break. No TV.. not much DU.. just letting my brain and nerves air out from the primary season. So today I turn the TV on for a bit.. I think I'm going to hear issues, now that the primaries are over and all.

Well - now it looks like they're polling "suburban white women", and think that Obama has a problem with them. This poll is what actually prompted Tweety's STUPID statement above. "Not even going into Appalachia, how does he connect with the regular people, those in Scranton, with the white guy?"

The other two instances I briefly flipped on the set, I saw nothing but MAPS. Yellow, red, blue, gray, all sorts of colored MAPS. Electoral MAPS AND MATH for an election next November. And I've heard not one word about ISSUES.. except for the live feeds of Obama which I'm fortunate enough to be able to tune into. It's like rerunning Dora the Explorer over and over.

Enough of freakin MAPS.. enough of freakin POLLS.. can we talk issues? Or are we right back into silly fucking season without a cell of intelligence amongst any of the punditocracy?

Is CNN any better? Are we really going to do this for five stinkin months??

This is me.. pulling my hair out. God help us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tweety has diarrhea of the mouth.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. that guy is so full of bullshit
war profiteers have unlimited resources and influence on the media

those invested in the symbiosis between our elected officials and the lobbyists that fund those campaigns are cranking up the heat

there will be no mercy... I guess it's up to us to keep each other informed... I'm on the receiving end of that process mostly, but I'm glad ya'all are here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's The One Quasi-Negative They Could Dredge Out Of Their Polls...
"He's got a problem..." has been their meme since the beginning.


K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Well, from what LITTLE I've been seeing lately, it looks like Obama is polling
well among Catholics, Hispanics and lots of other diverse groups.. so I guess you're right: they fished out a lemon and tried to make lemonade :-)

:nuke: em
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. I see HuffPo has just debunked this faux poll big time.. Pirate Smile posted about it.. and I guess
they're using it as an excuse to get to the "regular white guy" meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. Seth Colter Walls on HuffPo debunks that suburban white women "problem":
http://letters.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/06/12/fox_response/view/?show=all

<SNIP>

I am skeptical about results for smaller subgroups like 'suburban white women,'" said Emory University Professor of Political Science Alan Abramowitz. "There is more random 'noise' with smaller subgroups. How many of these 'suburban white women' were there in the NBC poll out of the 1,000 total registered voters? Figure about 750-800 whites, close to 400 white women, so maybe 150-200 suburban white women. A shift of a small number of voters would change the outcome."

Republican pollster Tony Fabrizio, who you might expect to celebrate the poll, also cast doubt on its findings regarding a preference among suburban women for McCain -- if for no other reason than that any one poll's margin of error increases as the reduced sample size of a "subgroup" becomes smaller and smaller. "If you have a thousand samples, maybe your margin of error for your overall sample is 3.1 percent ." Assuming approximately half of the poll's respondents were women, he said, "your margin of error goes up to 4.5 percent. Then take females and segment them among rural, urban and suburban . ... You've doubled your margin of error in that group." Fabrizio also said that disrupting the national distribution of a sample by looking at subgroups can throw any analysis out of whack by the same proportion, adding, "there are other vagaries that can go on to influence the sub-sample, too."

<SNIP>

In the published 33-page breakdown of the NBC-WSJ poll's results linked to on Pollster.com, the following phrase appears on the front page: "NOTE: The results contained in this document reflect results among the national crossection of voters ONLY." Given that the "suburban women" findings are not included in that document, it appears the Hart and Newhouse polling firms, which conducted the poll for the two media organizations, recognized that its subgroup findings on "suburban women" were not representative enough to include in the breakdown. So far, that hasn't stopped MSNBC from turning those numbers into big news. Emails to NBC's political unit asking for a numeric breakdown of "suburban women" in their poll were not immediately returned.

UPDATE:

MSNBC has now provided The Huffington Post with more information on its "suburban women" finding showing a 44-38 McCain lead over Obama. "This is within the margin of error of 9.34 percent based on a sample size of 110 within the larger poll," an MSNBC source wrote over email. (That's three times the margin of error for the entire poll.) This means McCain's 44 percent figure of support among suburban women could actually be as low as 35 percent, while Obama's 38 percent figure could rise as high as 47 percent (emphasis added)-- assuming a 95 percent confidence interval (for the stat wonks in the house). Alternatively, McCain could be leading Obama 53-29. While those distant outcomes are less likely true than NBC-WSJ's 44-38 finding, that broad variance raises questions about the statistical usefulness of this one particular crosstab, as opposed to the rest of the NBC-WSJ poll on the whole.* (emphasis added)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. His secret: Applebees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Its called finding something to talk about
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 04:56 PM by spokane
since the primary season is over they have to find something to say, its all about showing
they are earning their money create a lot of BS talking point just to confused
folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I'm thinking 35 reasons for chimpeachment isn't on the list of things to talk
about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yeah.. of course not..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. turn the asshole off....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. He said he wasn't talking about Appalachia where people are "ethnically conservative".
What exactly does "ethnically conservative" mean? Is that the new PC way to say racist?

Obama is ahead in almost every demographic yet they only focus on white men where Obama is doing better then Kerry did in 2004 and the new made-up demo - "suburban white woman". They can't just use white women because Obama is ahead in that demo. They must cut it down to some different group. Talk about slicing and dicing people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. OMG.. no, I didn't hear "ethnically conservative".. I turned it off after the regular people/white
guy. Man, that's seriously some fucked up stuff. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Turn it off. Seriously. And spread the word.
The corporate whore media is not our friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yeah.. I've been listening to Air America. The older I get, the less tolerant I am of stupidity :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm avoiding the media altogether until November
All we get is idiots like tweety talking out his ass. It's not even worth it. The news orgs have their directive. Obama could be up by double digits in the polls (oh wait, he is) and they'll still try to convince us it's a horse race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Good idea.. I think it's time to remodel my house again, LOL. That should keep
me busy until November ! Didn't even know Obama was up in the polls.. thanks for that tidbit !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. standard Tweety. He makes $10 million per year and thinks he's a "regular blue collar Joe"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. I have been kind of turned off since the primaries..
but yesterday I began getting wound up again and I began seeing and hearing the same garbage I was hearing through the primaries which began my screaming at the television again...

This is one thing that really irritates me and has always irritated me about especially Tweety,Scarbourough, and Buchanan. I have been laughing everytime I see Tucker because he lost his show and now he looks angry, something I have never seen with him, he usually thinks everything is funny like the rest of the CONS he hates it and I love it..

Scarborough said he left for a while because he wife was about to deliver a baby. I don't believe it takes weeks he couldn't take it either and probably asked for a break,as he saw Hillary was losing.

This sentence really had me screaming at Tweety through the primaries: "Not even going into Appalachia, how does he connect with the regular people, those in Scranton, with the white guy?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. It's weird.
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 04:43 PM by woolldog
Obama is ahead, and yet they're focusing on how weak he is. They never talk about the groups that McCain is weak with. Just the ones that Obama is weak with. Watching the tone and tenor of discussion around Obama, you'd think he was behind.

They don't ask how McCain can improve his standing with Hispanics, Blue collar dems etc, they only focus on Obama's "weaknesses."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. They're trying to make it a horse race.
They need to try to tear down Obama so the poll numbers are close. Otherwise, they have nothing to talk about; not as exciting if it isn't close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. its your fault you know!!!
Who asked you to disconnect and let your hair down!! The rest of us don't see anything different!

Who do you think u are anyway to expect issues to be discussed during a Presidential campaign??

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. LOL ! I know.. I feel like it's my fault !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's time for Tweety to retire into the dark night
He's really lost his political punditry touch. Rachel Maddow might be more partisan and liberal that Tweety, but MSNBC has to be thinking that at least she can put together coherent points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. MSNBC and CNN are pushing Obama as disconnected and boring.
It's irritating as hell. I'm only watching Keith and Jon for awhile. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Probably a good idea.. 8p and 11p, I can handle. I'll count on you guys for the rest !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. If his sold out book at my local bookstore is any indication
I'd say he sure as hell is connecting with suburban whites.

Went to Barnes & Noble near my house in what is the whitest, richest, most repuke county in North TX and after a worker did a computer search and a LONG look around the store and stockroom, he said "uh, we sold out, I can order it for you". In the end I went to the bookstore down the street to get it (I read the first book but had yet to get the 2nd one).
BTW, Obama took this same county's delegates 2 to 1 over HRC. More than enough proof for the talking heads..not that they ever base their reporting on PROOF/truth/actual stats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. Hey Tweety!! He's beating the guy you're not asking that about!!
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 06:02 PM by TexasObserver
McCain is barely breaking 40%, and he's been a fixture on the national scene for 30 years, a POW with a fairly decent lifetime reputation. Where are all the questions about why can't McCain draw support?

It's amazing how Obama can be ahead in so many demos, but the talking heads are all about the percentage of white voters he isn't getting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. What tv shows talk about the issues?
Some more airing out may be called for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC