See, that's the one thing that irked me about the Trinity UCC issues. It wasn't that the preachers were saying "God damn America" or various other things that irked so many other people. It wasn't that they were encouraging their parishioners to support Obama, even though that's still a touchy issue with keeping ones 501(c)3 status -- they weren't saying you had to vote for Obama.
It was when they argued *against* a candidate from the pulpit.
Sure, part of that was because they were arguing against the candidate I supported. But....
A 501(c)3 organization, which most churches are, cannot intervene in a political campaign and still keep their 501(c)3 status.
From the Pew Forum, attempting to explain the fine line a church must walk:
"The IRS has advised that for an issue discussion to violate the political campaign intervention prohibition, it must contain some reasonably overt indication of support for or opposition to a particular candidate. A communication is particularly at risk of violating the political campaign intervention prohibition if it makes reference to candidates or voting in a specific upcoming election. The IRS has identified the following factors as relevant when determining whether an advocacy communication constitutes political campaign intervention:
(a) whether the communication identifies one or more candidates for a public office;
(b) whether the communication expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates’ positions and/or actions;
(c) whether the communication is delivered close in time to an election;
(d) whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election;
(e) whether the issue addressed in the communication has been raised as an issue distinguishing candidates for a given office;
(f) whether the communication is part of an ongoing series of communications on the same issue that are independent of the timing of any election; and
(g) whether the timing of the communication and identification of the candidate are related to a non-electoral event, such as a scheduled vote on specific legislation by an officeholder who also happens to be a candidate for public office."
http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=281From what I understand, Father Pfleger's comments came so far after the Illinois primary that they wouldn't count. The election as far as Illinois was concerned had already happened. I am unsure what the date was for the "Hillary Clinton ain't been called ..." sermon given by Reverend Wright. Again, if it was after the election, I don't think those comments could put the church in jeopardy.
But if your boss's pastor was talking about Obama in a negative manner before your state's primary, or continues to do so now that Obama has been named our nominee, your boss's church could lose its 501(c)3 status. And that's rather serious.
It's a fine line for churches to walk, but many churches have lost their tax-exempt status for such things. One rather blatant case was where a church paid for a political ad 4 days before the election in major newspapers against Bill Clinton in 1992, using church funds. But there are other cases.
I don't know if it would help or hurt your discussions in the office regarding politics to mention it, but if you know of specific churches putting their 501(c)3 status in jeopardy, a call to the IRS wouldn't be bad IMHO....