Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When McCain Drops Out

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:42 AM
Original message
When McCain Drops Out
I have been speculating this for weeks, the real possibility that McSame isn't the candidate:

Huffintong Post:

When the Republicans choose their candidate on September 4th, there is a very real chance that they could throw the election into an unexpected chaos as they pull a genuine September Surprise.

I think there is every reason to believe John McCain won't be the nominee. Ok, let me say that again. McCain will not be the Republican candidate in November.


Here's how it could happen:

At some point in mid August, John McCain will announce that he has decided that he can not accept his party's nomination for president. The reason will be health-related, and that may turn out to be the truth. Anyone who's seen him on stage these days knows he looks like he's about to keel over. And anyone who's been on a presidential campaign knows the physical demands are grueling and can be a challenge for a young man.

<snip>

Here's a list of names. Some you know, some you don't. But each of them knows their name is in play. Among them --

Condoleezza Rice (Secretary of State)
Colin Powell (fmr Sec. of State)
Marilyn Musgrave (Colorado Congresswoman)
Mitt Romney (fmr Massachusetts Governor)
Mike Huckabee (fmr Governor of Arkansas)
Charlie Crist (Florida Governor)
Tim Pawlenty (Minnesota Governor)
Bobby Jindal (Louisiana Governor)
Mark Sanford: (Governor of South Carolina)
John Thune (Senator from South Dakota)
Dick Lugar (Senator from Indiana)
Chuck Hagel (Senator from Nebraska)
MIchael Bloomberg (NYC Mayor)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Goin' Condo !!
Please let her run, the only way we could lose is ..... oh yeah, we'd just get "2000nd" again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. whopps...
Edited on Mon Jun-16-08 08:44 AM by Zachstar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. It would have to be Romney, That late in the game its name recognition only
Edited on Mon Jun-16-08 10:33 AM by Boz
It won be Colin Powell, hes stated a middle affinity to a possible Obama vote. It wont be Hagel, Bloomberg is out again middle of the road not right enough for this kind of jackpot, they would have no time to "fix" attitudes in the party that late in the game.

That leaves pure name recognition and pre set attitude, that leaves 2 people in the party Romney and Gingrich and I dont believe Gingrich can over come the Knowns, I think Romneys unknowns let him slide against his knowns.

And one late one into the thought Cheney with Powell as VP, that would be a hard hit ticket to mobilize the repubs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. The funny thing about that is
it would be easy to come up with an ad for that one. The theme: bait and switch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. how about, they couldn't stand the man their voters elected?
"Listening to the people, yeah ... right ..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. if you're looking at certain defeat at the polls, it'd make sense to replace the candidate and then
blame the loss on that rather than your own failed agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. That's true
But I was thinking along the lines of a commercial of a person wanted to buy a car in an ad, then they come in and find out that they don't have that car?

Either that or a magic type theme with a card that has the picture of McCain put into a hat and then they pull out a card with someone else's face (whomever is running).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonn1997 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. They don't have to pick the candidate with the 2nd most primary delegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. No. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Dick Lugar? I'm not sure he can stay awake long enough to even hear
his name announced.

This is a kind of dramatic theory, and I don't have hard evidence to prove it wrong, but it just seems far-fetched and implausible.

I'm not seeing Republican delegates in Minneapolis nominating an anti-Iraq War candidate like Hagel.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. I doubt it
McCain is perfect as the weak candidate because they will lose no matter what and they don't want the loss to be blamed on Bush's legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think Powell and Hagel are already voting for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Could Bloomberg be on both tickets?
Bloomberg has been suggested as the bottom of an Obama/Bloomberg ticket.

Could he also run as the top of a Bloomberg/Romney ticket?

Is he REP or DEM, or some kind of chameleon?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. He's a dem - that went rep - that went indie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. New York Jew: not a likely rethuglican candidate
plus the fact that he is actually a New York Liberal - who ran as a Republican because he couldn't buy the Democratic slot. He is like kryptonite to the bible-smacked party base.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
11. It won't be Huckabee
Whilst the GOP often talks about "bringing the constitution in line with the Bible" in order to appease their Southern Evangelical base, the last thing the moneyed GOP elite wants is a nominee who actually means it, especially one who throws economic populism into the mix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Agree. The old guard Puke operatives are highly suspicious of
Huckabee and his dog-torturing younguns.

He doesn't play by the "rules" understood to be the rules Puke noms are supposed to play by, and he does have one of the loosest lips ever seen in American politics.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. I also have thought that this could be a real possibility
The McCain screw ups are just too many for him to be a credible candidate so he is either

(1) A sacrificial lamb during an election year they knew they would never win so why put their best and brightest out there, or
(2) he is a temporary stand-in until the real nominee is named at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:13 AM
Original message
if he is the sacrificial lamb, the rnc would be funding him better. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
25. Why would you fund a sacrificial lamb?
Waste the money on a sure loser? The answer is you wouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. i doubt they would want it to look obvious by withholding
funds from the nominee . . . especially if he does not know he is the sacrificial lamb.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Then what's your explanation for a lack of funding?
This McCain is a joke. He's lucky the media is in bed with Republicans so that they refuse to do any kind of in-depth reporting on all of the faux pa's and "misspeaks" he has made AND been publicly corrected on. He is a sacrificial lamb, someone they figured was old and at the end of his political career...give the old guy a sendoff by letting him be a POTUS candidate in an election they are sure to lose. That saves face for the younger Republicans who may, just a slight may, but may have some political future ahead of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. i didn't say they were going to fully fund him! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. If anything will make them lose worse than with McCain
it would eb pulling a bait and switch.

No way does this scenario happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. Whaaat? No "Jeb!" on the list?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. My husband has been saying this since McCain became the "presumptive one"
We're thinking Romney. And that's fine with me, too. I am convinced Obama will beat anyone on their side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. But if they wanted Romney...
...why not just vote for him in the primaries? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. "Screen play"
Catch the defense unprepared.

It would be a good tactic, if I thought they actually had the brains to plan it.

I think they are just being surprised by all the negatives coming out about McCain. Including his military background.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
18. I doubt VERY MUCH that it will be a woman or a person of color
Given the outright bigotry the GOP flung at both Clinton and Obama, I have absolutely no doubt that a McSame replacement will be a white male. I am almost as certain that it will not be Romney, as the slime machine went into overtime over his being a Mormon rather than a "proper" Christian (read: conservative Protestant.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. I thought Condie had already given her Shermanesque speech ..
Edited on Mon Jun-16-08 08:55 AM by Tuesday Afternoon
and I think Powell would also bow out.

Denials
Dr. Rice has, several times, noted that she has no intention of running for president in 2008. Despite her emphatic denials, the Draft Condi movement continues to grow. Here is a list of dates and statements she has made about the 2008 race.

more at link: http://voterice.wikia.com/wiki/Denials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
22. They may just be stuck with McCain, which is not the best of news for
Republicans.

There isn't an easy way for the GOP to gussy-up this election cycle, coming as it does after 8 very long years of deceit, corruption, and failure of the Bush administration.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
24. I have been thinking about this as well.
Even if they got Ron Paul they would have at most a 50 percent shot at the presidentcy.

McCain that number drops to 20 because he cant go a few days without making a serious political mistake.



I highly doubt they will replace him with Paul unless they wanted to do it for shits and giggles because they rejected paul in the primaries.

What I am fearful of is they pick Rudy.... The last thing this country needs is the constant references to that horrible day again. He stands about a 40 percent shot but would delay things because of the damn sabre rattling.


If McCain drops out due to health The "bait and switch ad" wont work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
26. I'd add Jebbie and Dick Cheney as dark horses to the list.
I won't add Rudy as he's poisoned the well by saying he'd only campaign if he was paid to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
27. I agree they'll twist his arm to bail on it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
29. I posted my thoughts about this possibility about two weeks ago
Earlier today I read somewhere that Bush has been pushing for Jeb to be McCain's VP....McCain will never make it to the election, he just looks to ill. Not sure who will be his replacement...Not many will want to chance a run under the circumstances as they are right now....One thing I have learned over the years..you can not trust a Republican...I they see an opening they will make their move and do it quickly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Exactly! - you can not trust a Republican
Never, Never, Never
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
35. That is so not gonna happen.
Bloomberg? Hagel? Are you kidding me? They've already rejected Lugar, who at least has moments of clarity. Of that list, probably only Romney, Pawlenty, or Sanford would be plausible.

But the truth is, they're gonna nominate Quickdraw McCain and try to ride that wave all the way down to the beach. I predict a wipe out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatherTime1408 Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
36. Preposterous. McCain is the nominee. He aint dropping out unless he dies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
38. Has this ever happened
before? I replied up thread a couple of times, but was just thinking about whether or not there is a history of this or if it will be something unprecedented. I'm thinking it hasn't, which will make it even more damming for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaxbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. a friend who has worked in government a looooong time
says it could also be Fred Thompson. :shrug: At least he's "played" president on TV and can read a script... kinda like Ronny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
40. Fascinating idea. Stealth candidate... and there was a little Jeb talk today... K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RNdaSilva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
41. Stretches of Imagination...
The Twilight Zone...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC