|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 10:51 PM Original message |
Why did MSNBC cut Obama off tonight straight after Gore's speech? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Because three and a half straight days of mourning Timmeh just ain't enough, damn it!!111!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. It was Abram's program and he and his producer were in charge of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Abrams should be ashamed of himself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brigid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. Frustrating, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. Because the pundit heads believe themselves to be what's important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. more likely the "news" event was gore - obma would be more of the same to them nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. Because he's pulling away from the Maverick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. Because the primaries are over. They are in McCain/GE mode now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Purveyor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. Of course Abrams needed all of his time to stump for Hillary as Barack's VP.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. His program is the only watchable one on MSNBC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 12:24 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Can we still say that? Will we be tombstoned? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 12:38 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. He made it VERy obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hieronymus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-16-08 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. I emailed MSNBC and turned on C-SPAN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneAmerica (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
12. All three channels did actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 10:03 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Thanks for letting me know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 02:34 AM Response to Original message |
15. Because THE endorsement was THE NEWS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 10:04 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. at least they could have shown SOME of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
19. Because the endorsement was the news. Obama was just giving his stump. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 10:12 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. it is usual to at least let the 'endorsee' have a couple of minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
20. If you've noticed...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. maybe the GOP are engineering that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
23. More annoying was Abrams not cutting to Gore quickly enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 10:27 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Abrams just couldn't stop talking to let us watch Obama and Gore enter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I'm glad you noticed it, too. I think the media are disconnected... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. yes the entry of Gore and Obama was important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
24. MSNBC thinks their useless yacking is more interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-17-08 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
29. WHY?......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC