Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So why aren't we hearing more about the Keating Five, which McCain was one of them.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:26 AM
Original message
So why aren't we hearing more about the Keating Five, which McCain was one of them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five

Corruption allegations
Gray testified that several U.S. senators had approached him and requested that he ease off on the Lincoln investigation. It came out that these senators had been beneficiaries of $300,000 (collective total) in campaign contributions from Keating. McCain received $112,000 by 1987 from Keating and Keating's relatives and employees to McCain's Senate campaign, more than any of the other Senators. <1> In September 1987 National Thrift News was the first media outlet to break the story.<2> In October 1989 The Arizona Republic reported that in addition to campaign contributions, McCain's wife and her father had invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center in April 1986, a year before McCain met with the regulators. The paper also reported that the McCains, sometimes accompanied by their daughter and baby-sitter, had made at least nine trips at Keating's expense, sometimes aboard the American Continental Corporation (parent of Lincoln) jet. Three of the trips were made during vacations to Keating's opulent Bahamas retreat at Cat Cay. McCain also did not pay Keating for some of the trips until years after they were taken, after he learned that Keating was in trouble over Lincoln. <3> Lincoln Savings and Loan's collapse is said to have cost taxpayers $3.4 billion <4>.

This allegation set off a series of investigations by the California government, the United States Department of Justice, and the Senate Ethics Committee. The ethics committee's investigation focused on five senators: Alan Cranston (D-CA); Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ); John Glenn (D-OH); John McCain (R-AZ); and Donald W. Riegle, Jr. (D-MI), who became known as the "Keating Five".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because McCain was one of them
We are still dealing with a right wing media propaganda machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Um, but if you read the link - he was one of them
And received more money from Keating than the other 4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And that is why we are not hearing about it in the M$M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. His was the only politicak career that survived; he pled "naivete."
In his own bio, he says he honestly couldn't think that taking Keating's private jet to Phoenix to meet with KKeating might appear to be a conflict of interest--even though he was on the commerce committee at the time.

The AZ press excoriated DeConcini, but McCain got a pass, he always has from the local, demonstrably RW press.

We don't need that kind of wide-eyed innocence in the WH. Nor do we need the utter STUPIDITY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. He pretty much got a pass form the local RW press. You have to
realize that when he married the SECOND Mrs. McCain, he was ushered into the local old-boy network.

In Phoenix, that old-boy network very much included the AZ Republic and Phoenix Gazette newspapers (both owned by the powerful Quayle cla, remember them?).

The local independent press covered it mercilessly and built a respected and powerful reputation on it, but at the time, they were virtual nobodies; not the case any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. you answered your own question-
the reason we aren't hearing about it is because mccain was one of them.

duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. We don't want to hear more about the Keating Five. The Dems look much worse than McCain there.
Four of the Keating Five were Democrats.

And Bob Bennetth, the Democratic special investigator at the time, told the Senate Ethics Committee NOT to include McCain because there was no evidence against him. Bennett has suggested that the ONLY reason McCain was included was to keep that scandal from being only about Democrats.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_The_New_York_Times

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331651,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. None of the Dems are in office anymore - can't really hurt us
and McCain is running for office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Oh, yes, it can. You can't resurrect that old story without resurrecting Democratic involvement,
and this would backfire very badly on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Maybe not. But everyone else involved is retired. McKeating is very active.
Who's of more interest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. I don't think so
MCCAIN is running for POTUS.

The 4 Democrats? Not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. And they are all gone from the political scene. Old news. McKeating is running for president.
Not old news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Perhaps because it happened almost 20 years ago
and people have other issues that are more important???
Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Keating incident is part of McBush's politcal history, listed below hero...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. because we are too busy talking about recipes.
And ignoring the corruption of McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. Because it happened over two decades ago, and the media needs a reason to rehash ancient news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. Completely agree with you, this story needs more daylight
I don't care if other Dems were involved here. I'm not out to protect these other Dems from their actions, they should get what they deserve as well.

McCain is running for president. This kind of scandal is something the American people NEED to hear about. Failure to report on this is failure to do your job as a journalist imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. I think we can wait till the last week in October for that
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yep. Its wayyyy too early to bring this up.
Better to wait until people are paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NatBurner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. because flamboyant pastors are more important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
20. The Keating S&L scandal is mischaracterized as a bribery scandal- it was BCCI looting US banks
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/leveymg/365

SNIP

McCain and BCCI, the Bush Bank

Before he was selected to as Ronald Reagan’s 1980 running mate, George H.W. Bush had a short and little-known career as an international banker. That effectively started in 1976, while Bush was still CIA Director, a post he held for part of the Nixon and Ford Administration. In the final months of the Ford presidency, Bush made a deal with the newly-appointed head of Saudi General Intelligence Directorate, Prince Turki al-Faisal. The two spy chiefs agreed the CIA would look the other way while the Saudis ran their own global operations. In exchange, the Saudis financed the sort of black ops that had been banned by the Democratic Congress after Watergate and the Church Committee hearings. The arrangement was called “The Safari Club” , and the funding mechanism for this was the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, “BCCI”. See, http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/7/8/146... ; http://www.saudiembassy.net/2006News/State...

Newly-elected President Jimmy Carter fired the CIA Director. In early 1977, Houston banker Joe Allbritton appointed Bush to direct his First International Bancshares (dba, First Interbank) and its London and Luxembourg affiliates. According to Kevin Phillips, Bush’s bank was among the first outposts in America for BCCI. http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-0... In the early 1980s, Allbritton followed G.H.W. to Washington, purchasing Riggs Bank, installing brother Jonathan Bush as a Director.

Riggs closed in 2004 after being fined $25 million dollars for violation of federal money laundering and anti-terrorism laws. Riggs had catered to high-end foreign customers and the diplomatic trade in Washington, as well as having “a relationship” with the CIA. http://www.slate.com/id/2112015 / After 9/11, the bank was found to have transferred money from Saudi Embassy accounts that ended up supporting two of the 9/11 hijackers, Flt. 77 leaders Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khaleed al-Midhar after their arrival in the U.S. See, http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/b...

Know Your Banking Customer: Salem Bin Laden

Meanwhile, back in Texas, First Interbank merged with Jim Baker’s Republic Bank, in which the Saudis had taken a stake with the 1978 purchase of the bank’ headquarters building by members of the Bin-Laden and bin-Mahfouz families. The merger of these two Texas banks several years later created the largest regional financial institution in the U.S. Infused with capital from Saudi Arabia, First RepublicBank went on a massive bargain buying binge in the Southwest oil patch. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2004/mar/3...

This Saudi-financed merger of the Bush bank with the Baker bank created the nation’s largest bank holding company, and soon the largest bank failure, resulting in a $1 billion tax-payer funded bailout in 1987. This was to become a pattern for the trillion dollar rip-off to come. See, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html...

McCain's Role in Covering Up the The Trillion Dollar Bank Heist

It’s been said that the American people didn’t become very angry about the S&L crisis because the explanations given for what caused it were too complicated for many to comprehend. That seems to have set a pattern for financial scandals to follow. Nobody dared tell the American public – although the 1992 Kerry Commission report came close -- that their financial system was being looted by a well-funded, highly-organized global criminal organization with ties to half a dozen of the world’s most powerful intelligence services, including elements of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. They didn't name CIA Headquarters, "The George H.W. Bush Intelligence Center" for nothing. See,
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/b...



Buried in all this muck is the thread running through all these financial scandals – from Keating to Silverado to First RepublicBank to BCCI to Enron -- has been corrupt management, corrupt officials, corrupt intelligence operatives, and corrupt auditors. See, http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/92jan/st...

As the group’s scams became more sophisticated and wide-ranging, the price tag for bail-outs escalated. The federal rescue of Neil Bush’ Silverado S&L cost the taxpayer $1.3 billion. The price tag for Charles Keating’s Lincoln Savings & Loan bailout eventually reached $2.6 billion. http://www.slate.com/id/1004633 BCCI was termed “the $20-billion-plus heist.” (Beatty, Jonathan; S.C. Gwynne. The Outlaw Bank: A Wild Ride Into the Secret Heart of BCCI Beard Books (1993)). Finally, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) estimated that Enron fleeced ratepayers of $30 billion, creating the 2001 California energy crisis. On November 15, 2005, FERC settled with Enron’s receivers for a mere $1.5 billion. http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/in...

The Keating S&L scandal was part of a now-familiar pattern of transnational commodities price-fixing, land grabs, stock-price rigging, fraudulent audits, financial panic, and public bailouts, all carried out by an overlapping cast of characters with ties to foreign and domestic intelligence agencies. Amidst the financial panic of 1986-88 that followed the drop of a barrel of oil from $39 to $13, many of these banks and S&Ls (and their land deeds and oil rights) were bought out for pennies on the dollar. More than a thousand deregulated financial institutions went belly up and were looted. Deregulation allowed crooked bank managers to cash in on the junk bond craze that was sweeping Wall Street. Banks and S&Ls issued unsecured notes and plots of land and traded them in circles with other institutions to ring up the notional value to support cash-out loans for themselves and their partners.

This is precisely the sort of round-robin games that Neil Bush, Director of Silverado S&L played with Charles Keating and his partners, Saudi European Investment Corp’s board and officers – Roger Tamraz, Tolat Othman, Abdullah Taha Bakhsh, Abbas Gokal -- along with other BCCI players. All told, the S&L scandal left the American taxpayer holding the tab for an estimated $1 trillion bailout. See, Steven Wilmsen: Silverado: Neil Bush and the Savings & Loan Scandal, p. 81; http://www.netmagic.net/~franklin/SS1.html ;
http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:IpskRJ... ;
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getc...

It was during this period that the Saudis and Gulf states leveraged their earnings from American bank acquisitions through junk-bond mills, and then moved on to the 1996 Chemical-Chase and Citi banks consolidations in New York. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html... Today, Prince Alaweed’s Kingdom Holdings owns a substantial and growing share of Citicorp, the largest bank in America, along with a portfolio of the nation’s largest financial, technology and media corporations. A similar process of slash and burn acquisition of the U.S. financial industry is now going on with the collapse of the U.S. mortgage and derivatives markets. See, http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/week... ; http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/11/business...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Thank you for all your research into Bush, BCCI

I'm bookmarking so I can refer back to this tangled web of corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
22. LynneSin
What an excellent question.

I hope to hell the DNC plans on using this in some powerful ads - SOON.

K&R:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
24. Because the spineless so-called "liberal"
media won't dare talk about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC