Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Obama lead the way to stopping Chimp's House-approved FISA bill?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:37 PM
Original message
Will Obama lead the way to stopping Chimp's House-approved FISA bill?
I think it'll never pass in the Senate, if Obama can provide the leadership to help stop the FISA bill by introducing amendments after amendments of removing the immunity off the HR bill, and in conference, it can be declared unresolvable, and we'll get the one we'll need once Obama and the majority (and possibly filibuster-proof) of Democrats in power.

Things will fucking change, and it'll change for the better. And once the people of the U.S. realize that the Republican experiment is long over, and corporations begin to lose the right to fuck around with the people (corporate personhood). They'll demand a lot what we liberals have been begging for years - reforms and changes.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess we'll find out
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm more pessimistic about what Obama will do next week.
I predict that he'll vote for an amendment removing retroactive immunity. The amendment won't pass. Then he'll vote for the whole bill including retroactive immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's how I read it and I find that lame beyond words.
I'm seriously disappointed and hope Obama takes notice of the netroots' anger because he has a lot to lose by caving in with the rest of those craven opportunists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I just hope he takes the outrage to heart and does something about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. To be blunt,
I'm not sure he NEEDS to do anything about it. He SHOULD, but if he doesn't, he's not losing my vote. I have no other choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well to be blunt he has my vote as well regardless, I just hope, sincerely
hope that he is who he says he is...I mean the only other choice doesn't even deserve mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I'm with you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I HOPE so too.
Obama wrapped himself up so much in the hope and change bit that I'm holding him to it. The hope was during the Primaries, the change better start now otherwise I just chalk off my donations as a painful loss and enjoy my summer. You don't get a bunch of angry activists all charged up about change and then do the same old. I gave him the benefit of the doubt for all his present and absent votes but this is a bit much.

Don't let us down Barack. Please don't. Stand with Wexler, Leahy and Feingold and say HELL NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. According to Rachel,
if he doesn't want it to pass, he's gotta filibuster. The Senate can't just say "we'll pass it EXCEPT for the retroactive immunity." If that's what they decide, then it would have to go back to the House.

So I'm not sure exactly what Obama meant when he said he would fight the immunity part in the Senate. :shrug:
Did you take that to mean he would introduce amendments, as you reference in your OP, Hawkeye?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Does anyone understand what makes this bill a "marked improvement"
as Obama referred to it? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Here is a quote from Obama
Edited on Fri Jun-20-08 09:11 PM by Eric J in MN
"It restores FISA and existing criminal wiretap statutes as the exclusive means to conduct surveillance – making it clear that the President cannot circumvent the law and disregard the civil liberties of the American people."

The original FISA says that it's the exclusive law for intelligence eavesdropping.

Then the Bush Administration decided that the Consitution lets him eavesdrop outside of FISA.

Congress could have impeached Bush and/or allowed the FISA lawsuits to continue.

Instead, impeachment is "off the table" (Nancy Pelosi) and Congress is stopping the lawsuits.

But Congress wrote in the bill-again-that FISA is the the exclusive law for intelligence eavesdropping.

Of course, there is no reason why a future president should be deterred by the phrase "exclusive" appearing in a bill twice instead of once.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Sadly no n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. As President he can spy on Chimpy...
"It does, however, grant retroactive immunity, and I will work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses." - Barack obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty fender Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. If Obama can't support the Constitution, then I can't
support him. How can he be the agent of change if he votes like a Republican? Does Obama now believe that some people and corporations are above the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC