Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: I'll Fight To Strip Telecom Immunity From FISA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:57 PM
Original message
Obama: I'll Fight To Strip Telecom Immunity From FISA
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 12:59 PM by TeamJordan23
Lets hold off judgment to see what happens in the Senate next week. If the retroactive Immunity is not stripped, then it will be interesting to see what Obama does.

Obama: I'll Fight To Strip Telecom Immunity From FISA

(CBS/AP) - Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., issued a statement in support of the House's update of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, but said he would try to strip a provision granting immunity to telecommunication companies when the bill comes to a vote in the Senate next week.

The House approved a compromise bill Friday that would set new electronic surveillance rules that would also shield telecoms from lawsuits arising from their participation in the government's warrantless eavesdropping on telephone and computer lines in the United States.

The government eavesdropped on American phone and computer lines for almost six years after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks without permission from the FISA Court, the special panel established for that purpose under the original 1978 law.

Some 40 lawsuits have been filed against the telecommunications companies by groups and individuals who say the Bush administration illegally monitored their phone calls or e-mails.

Obama said there is "little doubt" that the Bush Administration, with the cooperation of major telecommunications companies, "has abused authority and undermined the Constitution by intercepting the communications of innocent Americans without their knowledge or the required court orders."

"Given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as president, I will carefully monitor the program.

" does, however, grant retroactive immunity, and I will work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses."

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/06/21/politics/horserace/entry4200105.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's good Obama is doing this...
Let's see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good. And if he fails to do so, he should lead the opposition to its passage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope he succeeds.
Good for him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, wake up from the vapors and get off the fainting couch, ladies--
if he votes to strip immunity, what's with the hysteria?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. And Harry Reid doubts there will even be a vote on an amendment.
So thanks for...well, thanks for nothing, Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. If CBS can accurately portray his stand, why can't DUers? K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. FISA is unconstitutional. Simply letting it expire would be by far the best
course of action. We don't need "effective intelligence collection tools" that give Bushco carte blanche to shit on the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. stripping the immunity portion form this bill is a long long shot....
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 01:05 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
I want to see the whole bill go down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. If they want to give the companies immunity from prosecution, then
let them have it (they're going to end up with it, one way or another)BUT ONLY if we get the full story on who authorized it, who they were targeting (including those politicians and/or MSM they spied on, blogs and citizen groups) beyond foreign and domestic terrorists. I'll never believe terrorists were their first target. They were building their database for use in the 2004 election. Our safety was the least of their concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC