Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain’s Boeing Battle Boomerangs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 02:40 PM
Original message
McCain’s Boeing Battle Boomerangs
Michael Isikoff | NEWSWEEK

One of John McCain's most celebrated achievements in recent years was his crusade to block a Pentagon contract with Boeing for a new fleet of midair refueling tankers. Incensed over what he denounced as a taxpayer "rip-off," McCain launched a Senate probe that uncovered cozy relations between top Air Force officials and Boeing execs. A top Air Force officer and Boeing's CFO ended up in prison. Most significantly, the Air Force was forced to cancel the contract—saving taxpayers more than $6 billion, McCain asserted.

But last week, McCain's subsequent effort to redo the tanker deal was dealt a setback. Government auditors ruled that the Air Force made "significant errors" when it rebid the contract and awarded the $35 billion project to Boeing's chief rival, partners European Aeronautic Defense and Space Co. (or EADS) and Northrop Grumman.

It's likely the Air Force will have to redo the bid yet again, which analysts say will delay the replacement of the fleet's 1950s-era refueling tankers.The auditors' ruling has also cast light on an overlooked aspect of McCain's crusade: five of his campaign's top advisers and fund-raisers—including Tom Loeffler, who resigned last month as his finance co-chairman, and Susan Nelson, his finance director—were registered lobbyists for EADS.

Critics, including some at the Pentagon, cite in particular two tough letters McCain wrote to Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England in 2006 and another to Robert Gates, just prior to his confirmation as Defense secretary. In the first letter, dated Sept. 8, 2006, McCain wrote of hearing from "third parties" that the Air Force was about to redo the tanker competition by factoring in European government subsidies to EADS—a condition that could have seriously hurt the EADS bid. McCain urged that the Pentagon drop the subsidy factor and posed a series of technical questions about the Air Force's process.

"He was trying to jam us and bully us to make sure there was competition by giving EADS an advantage," said one senior Pentagon official, who asked for anonymity when discussing a politically sensitive matter. The assumption within the Pentagon, the official added, was that McCain's letters were drafted by EADS lobbyists. "There was no one else that would have had that level of detail," the official said. (A Loeffler associate noted that he and Nelson were retained by EADS after the letters were drafted...............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. BIG K&R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Me too...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, this is baaaad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why in the hell...

...would he want to give contracts away to a foreign company? (I know for political / monetary purposes.) But what a BASTARD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. What kills me
is that the EADS/NG contract already assumes a 30 billion in extra costs to rebuild runways for the huge aircraft they would build.
How in the hell is he saving taxpayer money?
This should sink him once and for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Geez. If we can't stop this cronyism at the federal level, what chance
do we have of stopping it anywhere else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
7.  Kick...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. As usual, there is more to this story. There is SPECULATION that the tanker decision was
not only a rebuke for Boeing, but also Washington State, with its Democrat Governor and two Democrat Senators. Pushing Boeing out of the running for the tanker deal would almost guarantee layoffs at Boeing and provide financial ammunition for Dino (the scumbag) Rossi's next run at the Governor's mansion. It could also set the stage for a rethuglican Senate challenger. Washington was one of the Blue states targeted by the rethuglican high command in their quest to change the Northwest's political leanings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. ... and that ensured that Washington would go Democratic in 2008. Oops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. McBush made no friends with his outright manipulation of the Boeing deal.
Even though WA is a Blue state, Boeing is somewhat of a Red corporation, as are most of the defense industry contractors in Washington State. And there are a lot of defense industry contractors in Washington. Yes, you are very right. This will probably backfire in McBush's face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. And people think McCain will win Kansas?
If he keeps up his Boeing hatred (a company that employs thousands in the Wichita area and infuses hundreds of millions into the local economy), the Wichita media will easily turn on him. The media is in bed with Boeing to a certain extent, so you can guaran-damn-tee that they will be sounding off on him. Plus, the Wichita TV stations provide news for nearly the entire lower and western portions of the state. If I were McCain, I'd stop pissing off Boeing, the airworkers, welders, machinists, and defense contractors scattered throughout the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
12.  oh btw, we still hate Washington here...
you fuckers stole our jobs and company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kick this big time...this just HAS to get legs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. So much dirt to dig.....
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 07:21 PM by FrenchieCat
wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC