Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Announces Plan to Fully Close the Enron Loophole

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 01:26 PM
Original message
Obama Announces Plan to Fully Close the Enron Loophole

Obama Release on “Enron Loophole”

Obama Announces Plan to Fully Close the Enron Loophole, Crack Down on Excessive Energy Speculation

As President, Obama will restore common-sense regulation to ease the impact of soaring gas prices

CHICAGO, IL—Senator Barack Obama today announced his plan to crack down on excessive energy speculation and fully close the “Enron Loophole” to ease the impact skyrocketing gas prices. The Enron Loophole was created by McCain campaign co-chair Phil Gramm at the behest of Enron—just one example of the special interest politics that put the interests of Big Oil and speculators ahead of the interests of working people. And the American people have seen the results: record corporate profits while Americans pay record prices at the pump.

“For the past years, our energy policy in this country has been simply to let the special interests have their way—opening up loopholes for the oil companies and speculators so that they could reap record profits while the rest of us pay $4.00 a gallon,” Senator Obama said. “My plan fully closes the Enron Loophole and restores common-sense regulation as part of my broader plan to ease the burden for struggling families today while investing in a better future.”

Barack Obama: Cracking Down on Excessive Energy Speculation to Ease the Impact of Record Oil Price Increases

Our economy is reeling from a historic run-up in oil prices. The price of crude oil has climbed from under $50 a barrel to an all-time high of nearly $140 in less than 18 months. American consumers are feeling the impact of these record prices at the gas pump, the grocery store, and in everyday purchases as well. At a time when families are already struggling with soaring healthcare costs, stagnant wages and record declines in housing values, these record energy prices are turning the middle-class squeeze into a devastating vice-grip for millions of families.

Barack Obama understands that while many factors are contributing to record oil prices, we must do everything we can to help ease the burden on struggling families in the near term while putting in place policies like conservation, development of alternative fuels and investments in new technologies to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and reduce oil consumption by 35 percent, or 10 million barrels, by 2030. He is particularly concerned that unregulated energy speculators may be distorting the market by making excessive bets on the future price of oil. Independent experts across the political spectrum have argued that excessive speculation in oil futures is contributing to high energy and food prices. Barack Obama understands importance of a vibrant oil futures market to help producers and buyers hedge against swings in the price of oil. But he believes that when an absence of common sense rules allows a few energy lobbyists and speculators to undermine the public confidence in the integrity of the market , we need common sense changes to restore market fundamentals so they work for working families. Today, he called for stepped-up oversight of energy markets to help stabilize oil prices and ease the burden of high energy prices for American families.

The Obama Plan to Crack Down on Excessive Energy Speculation

Ø Fully Close the “Enron Loophole”: One of the reasons our energy market is particularly vulnerable to excessive speculation is the so-called “Enron Loophole.” This provision was slipped into law by Senator Phil Gramm in late 2000 at the behest of Enron lobbyists to exempt some energy traders from the regulations and public protections applicable to exchange-traded commodities. As a result, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is unable to fully oversee the oil futures market and investigate cases where excessive speculation may be driving up oil prices. This regulatory gap is dangerous because: 1) the absence of government oversight has the potential to facilitate abusive trading or price manipulation. And 2) the failure of a large derivatives dealer could trigger disruptions of supplies and prices in energy markets. As President, Barack Obama will go beyond the changes included in the recently-passed Farm Bill and fully close the Enron loophole by requiring that U.S. energy futures trade on regulated exchanges. He will call for new, disaggregated data on index fund and other passive investments to increase transparency and oversight of the growing number of institutional investors participating in commodities futures markets. And he will support legislation directing the CFTC to investigate whether additional regulation is necessary to eliminate excessive speculation in U.S. commodities markets, including higher margin requirements and position limits for institutional investors.

Ø Ensure That U.S. Energy Futures Cannot be Traded on Unregulated Offshore Exchanges: CFTC oversight of oil market speculation is also limited by rules that allow energy traders to engage in unregulated transactions through foreign subsidiaries of U.S. exchanges. Currently, about 30 percent of U.S. oil futures trades fly below the regulatory radar because they are transacted on a U.S. exchange that works through a subsidiary in London. Similar arrangements are being pursued by U.S. exchanges in partnership with Dubai as well. Barack Obama would limit the price impacts of excessive speculation by preventing traders of U.S. crude oil from routing their transactions through off-shore markets in order to evade speculation limits and also impose reporting requirements.

Ø Work with Other Countries to Coordinate Regulation of Oil Futures Markets: As the global energy market expands and trading for oil futures increases, Barack Obama believes we must work with our other countries to establish uniform approaches to avoiding excessive speculation in commodities futures markets. As President, he would work through the International Organization of Securities Commissioners (IOSCO) and other international organization to harmonize regulations across countries. This effort will help to ensure that as the U.S. strengthens oversight and transparency in U.S. exchanges, these efforts are not undermined by overseas trading subject to lax regulations.

Ø Call on the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice to Vigorously Investigate Market Manipulation in Oil Futures. In 2007, Senator Obama supported legislation that gave the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) new authority to investigate and pursue price manipulation in oil markets. However, even in the face of record oil prices and growing concerns about excessive speculation, the Bush Administration has failed to utilize these new powers. Barack Obama does not believe we cannot afford to wait weeks and months more to vigorously investigate whether energy traders and oil companies manipulating the market at the expense of consumers. He is calling on the FTC to immediately expedite its investigation into market manipulation, including in the oil futures markets. He is also calling on the Department of Justice to open an investigation into whether energy traders have been engaged in illegal activities that have helped drive up the price of oil and food.

Independent experts agree that excessive speculation is elevating oil prices:

Ø Akira Yanagisawa, Senior Economist at Japan’s Energy Data and Modeling Center: “In the most recent terms (the third and fourth quarter in 2007), the fundamental prices are estimated around 50 to 60 dollars. On the other hand, it is estimated the premium has risen up to around 40 dollars at maximum.” http://eneken.ieej.or.jp/en/data/pdf/421.pdf, p. 13>

Ø Michelle Foss, Center of Energy Economics at University of Texas: “iven that inventories of crude and products are healthy in many locations and that the very real risk of supply disruptions has so far been avoided, the remaining factor left to balance the price per barrel is speculation. The role of speculation in oil markets has been widely debated but could add upwards of $20 to the price per barrel.” http://www.oxfordenergy.org/pdfs/NG18.pdf, p. 34>.

Ø Larry Chorn, Chief Economist of Platts: “says the actual costs incurred in producing the most expensive oil is only around $70 or $80 a barrel, meaning that about $50 of the current price represents ‘the market’s risk premium plus speculation.’” http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2008/ db20080513_734146_page_2.htm>.

Ø Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations: “Several analysts have estimated that speculative purchases of oil futures have added as much as $20-$25 per barrel to the current price of crude oil, thereby pushing up the price of oil from $50 to approximately $70 per barrel.” http://levin.senate.gov/newsroom/supporting/ 2006/ PSI.gasandoilspec.062606.pdf>.

Ø Clarence Cazalot Jr., CEO, Marathon Oil: “$100 oil isn’t justified by the physical demand in the market - it has to be speculation on the futures market that is fueling this.” http://money.cnn.com/2007/11/12/markets/oil_hundred/index.htm? postversion=2007111216>.

Ø J. Stephen Simon, Executive Vice President, Exxon-Mobil: the price of oil should be $50 to $55 per barrel based on supply and demand fundamentals. http://globalwarming.house.gov/tools/assets/files/0453.pdf>.

Ø John Hofmeister, President, Shell Oil Co: The proper range of crude oil is “somewhere between $35 and $65 a barrel.” http://www.financialpost.com/reports/oil-watch/story.html?id=532747>.

Ø Gerry Ramm, Senior Executive, Inland Oil Company: “Excessive speculation on energy trading facilities is the fuel that is driving this runaway train in crude oil prices.” http://commerce.senate.gov/ public/_files/RammSenateCommerce060308Testimony.pdf>.

Senator Obama’s speculation plan is part of his broader strategy to provide immediate relief from high gas prices while investing in a better energy future:

Ø Enact a Windfall Profits Tax on the Top Grossing Oil Companies and Ease the Burden on American Families: Barack Obama recognizes that it is critical that oil companies and shareholders have strong incentives to run well managed businesses that invest in efficiency and innovation. However, a significant share of the remarkable profits currently enjoyed by big oil companies has not resulted from their foresight, efficiency or innovation. Barack Obama supports imposing a windfall profits penalty on oil selling at or over $80 per barrel. Revenue from the proposal will be invested in a number of mechanisms to reduce the burden of rising prices, such as expanding resources for the federal Weatherization Assistance Program, increasing federal support for state and local-level efforts to relieve the burden of rising energy prices on low and moderate-income families, and helping permanently expand the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which helps families pay their heating and cooling bills. Obama will couple these investments with his plan to invest in job training initiatives that will help more Americans enter the growing energy efficiency jobs sector, a good-paying field that cannot be outsourced.

Ø Provide a Tax Cut for Working Families: Barack Obama will provide broad-based tax relief to American workers so they are better able to pay rising energy, housing and health care costs and save money for a secure retirement. The Obama tax fairness agenda provides 150 million workers a “Making Work Pay” tax credit of $500 per person or $1,000 per working family. The tax credit will completely eliminate income taxes for 10 million Americans.

Ø End Oil and Gas Industry Tax Breaks: Obama has called for repealing the oil and gas industry tax breaks that President Bush himself has said himself are unnecessary given today’s strong market incentive for expanding exploration and production.

Ø Cooperate with Oil Importing Nations to Reduce Demand: As new large oil importing nations come on the market, the United States is at the mercy of an ever more volatile oil market. Obama believes we should use existing organizations, like NATO, to make energy security a shared global goal. We should take steps to engage the largest new consumers, China and India, including by inviting them to join the International Energy Agency. Though they are not OECD countries, a formalized relationship for them with the International Energy Agency – where we work together on common analysis and emergency response mechanisms – is imperative.

Ø Invest in a Better Energy Future: Obama has a comprehensive plan to make America a global energy leader, including accomplishing the ambitious goal of reducing our dependence on foreign oil and reduce oil consumption overall by at least 35 percent, or 10 million barrels of oil, by 2030. This plan includes increased fuel economy standards, investments in developing advanced vehicles, building a biofuel distribution infrastructure, and building more livable and sustainable communities.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. GoBama!
K & R Sen Obama is not a 'perfect' choice for president, and there are some issue I'd like to see him discuss: i.e. his "Chicago School" advisors; but, he's a very good choice. He has the potential to be one of our great presidents!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Max_powers94 Donating Member (715 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good!!!!!!! He need to make a commercial out of this.
Edited on Sun Jun-22-08 01:40 PM by Max_powers94
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Good idea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. Yes. And point out Gramm's involvement in this.
There is no way McCain should be getting away with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Someone get this idea to Obama's staff
He could win on this issue alone. American is getting screwed and he is the only one telling the truth about this!

I can't figure out why I had to adventure over to GD presidential to find this information, this is about a helluva lot more than Obama and the presidential election. But I must say, my enthusiasm for Obama is growing and fast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Obama will restore common-sense regulation to ease the impact of soaring gas prices"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Major kick and recommend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well stated, comprehensive plan--GoBama
On another note--beef up your SS detail, my brother. You're planning on hurting the Beast where he's most sensitive--the wallet.

Duke

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. GoBama!!!!!!!!!!!! =D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. As a United States Senator...
...Barack Obama should introduce legislation IMMEDIATELY to close the Enron loophole. He should seek - and would no doubt receive - a co-sponsorship from Hillary Clinton.

As the de facto nominee of the Democratic Party, he should be able to get enough media coverage to explain it and embarrass some GOPers to go along. If the GOP attempts to kill it through manipulative actions or filibuster, make the bastards stay up all night and force vote after vote until they acquiesce...or let them explain it to the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monomach Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Can't do it until after he's President.
Bush'd take about half a second to veto it, and the votes to override wouldn't be there, no matter how much arm-twisting the Dems do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spiffarino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. True, but wouldn't you love to see the Repubs squirm?
Imagine the explaining they'd have to do back home:

Constituent: Senator Douchebag, would you explain why you didn't support closing the Enron loophole - the one that could potentially cut the price of gasoline by 25% - when it came up for a vote last July?

Sen. Douchebag: Aahh...errr..ummm...

Beautiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes! Yes! YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Out-freaking-standing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monomach Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. Hallefarkinglujah!
Gobama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. K&R Very sweet! And good on KO for featuring this imp. topic on Countdown. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. But, but, but.....
he's not perfect! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Heh...
I'd much rather see comments as innocuous as that than some of the crap I've read today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
18. ...
This is wonderful!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RNdaSilva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
19. One might want to help with the honesty poll at that site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
20. Excellent stuff. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. We've got your back!
:woohoo: :bounce: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
23. This is something the leadership in the Senate should be investigating...
We should not assume that the price increases are due solely to supply and demand. There is no proof of that. Why not investigate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
24. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. This is a good example
In why everyone should be asking themselves why would anyone be judging Obama over one issue or campaign strategy plan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC