Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Not one word. Not one f&^^$%$*&ing word!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:02 PM
Original message
Not one word. Not one f&^^$%$*&ing word!
Not one word in my paper about what McLame's analyst said about how another terrorist attack would help him.

Yet, yesterday they did a whole spread on how White Supremacist groups are growing now that Obama
is the Dem candidate.

:banghead:


Did anyone have Black's idiotic comments posted in today's paper?

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. "White Supremacist groups are growing"
"Growing"? Really?

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. The link in this thread seems to indicate growing interest in White
Supremacist groups.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6406016

Some are apparently using Obama's candidacy and possible Presidency as a recruiting tool.

"It’s not that the assortment of neo-Nazis, Klansmen, anti-Semites and others who make up this country’s radical right have suddenly discovered that a man should be judged based on the content of his character, not his skin. On the contrary. A growing number of white supremacists, and even some of those who pass for intellectual leaders of their movement, think that a black man in the Oval Office would shock white America, possibly drive millions to their cause, and perhaps even set off a race war that, they hope, would ultimately end in Aryan victory."

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2008/06/11/president-obama-many-white-supremacists-are-celebrating/#more-2475

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. From the LA Times, Pirhana
McCain aide apologizes for terrorist-attack comment
June 24, 2008

Charlie Black has had his moment of straight talk -- and chances are he's not going to let it happen again.

Fortune magazine, in an article posted online Monday, cited the "startling candor" by the strategist for John McCain in discussing how concerns about national security could offer political dividends for the Arizona senator and presumed GOP presidential nominee.

First, Black described the assassination of Pakistani political leader Benazir Bhutto in late December as an "unfortunate event" -- but one that boosted McCain's stock just before the must-win New Hampshire primary. The candidate's "knowledge and ability to talk about it reemphasized that this is the guy who's ready to be commander in chief. And it helped us," Black said.

Then the longtime Washington lobbyist went further. Asked what the political ramifications of another terrorist attack on U.S. soil might be for McCain, Black told Fortune, "Certainly it would be a big advantage to him."


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-trailblack24-2008jun24,0,5299405.story

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well that is good to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I wrote this LTTE this morning
letters@latimes.com

Re: ("McCain aide apologizes for terrorist-attack comment" June 24)

Mr. Black's "gaffe" (that thing they make in Washington when they are telling their "truth") may influence some voters toward McCain. It may have its political appeal, as it comes from the same cynical mindset that misled Americans into the war in Iraq, a country that never attacked the US, and let off those who did attack us and their state sponsors to recoup for another day—and sometimes fear works. It worked before, and Republicans like to think it can work again, that, if they just keep the public in a state of abject fear, they win.

While McCain has rejected Black's assessment, in December, he seemed to agree with it, saying about the Bhutto assassination, "I would hate for this tragedy to affect anyone's campaign." And adding, "My theme throughout this campaign has been that I'm the one with the experience, the knowledge, and the judgment. Perhaps it may serve to enhance those credentials."

Some voters will still believe, against all evidence, that Republicans are better on security than Democrats. Some voters will be tricked all over again, but many more won't. Cynicism and fear just doesn't promise to work so well, not this time. Barack Obama pledges to end the mindset in Washington that took us to a war that "never should have been authorized and never should have been fought." That mindset is the mindset of John McCain, who sings about bombing Iran, who thinks terrorist acts can enhance his "credentials," and whose campaign spokesman hopes to profit politically from a new terrorist attack on America. Too many Americans have woken up to the trickery perpetrated by the Bush administration and assisted by John McCain in his vote for war in Iraq.

A new security disaster can only remind us of how we got where we are today. If there should be, God forbid, a national security crisis before Election Day, voters will hold John McCain accountable. American voters will be reminded again and again before Election Day: If John McCain is so capable of keeping America safe and strong, why didn't he when it mattered? Why would his mindset, based on all of his experience, knowledge, judgment, and "credentials," be right now, when it was so tragically wrong then?

Anyone who thinks Barack Obama is going to lay down on national security in this election, just because he's running against a John McCain, had better think again.

Respectfully,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. WooHoo!
excellent!

I will have to send in something similar.

If they are not going to report all the news, then I guess it's up to us to do it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. In Arizona Hillary was the enemy during the primarys, now it has turned to Obama
I knew this would happen, McCain is the favorite son once again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. In my little part of the world
they loved Hillary :)

Hillary signs and bumperstickers were all over the place.


Guess the editor of my paper is going to get to know my name really well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I was referring to the news paper coverage, not out in the real world
Obama was endorsed by every paper during the primary's and now they are dicing and slicing him like they did Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. On DU we have more threads on Obama snubbing muslims than Black's comments
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 01:12 PM by thewiseguy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. They apologize but it is out there in print
There is nothing about stopping the magazine that the quote will be printed in.


McCain disavows aide's terrorism comment
Terror attack would be 'big advantage to him,' aide quoted as saying


FRESNO, Calif. - A top adviser to John McCain said another terrorist attack on U.S. soil would be a "big advantage" for the Republican presidential candidate, drawing a sharp rebuke Monday from both the presumed GOP nominee and Democrat Barack Obama.

Charlie Black, already in the spotlight for his past lobbying work, is quoted in the upcoming July 7 edition of Fortune magazine as saying such an attack "certainly would be a big advantage to him." Black said Monday he regretted the comment.

Black is also quoted as saying the "unfortunate event" of the assassination of former Pakistani leader Benazir Bhutto in December 2007 "helped us."



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25343817/?GT1=43001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. I saw it reported on
of all things Good Morning America this morning. I was sort of shocked. GMA?


----
Gilligan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC