Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA TIMES POLL: Obama 49 (+3), McSame 37 (-3). Huge "enthusiasm gap" benefits Obama.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:03 PM
Original message
LA TIMES POLL: Obama 49 (+3), McSame 37 (-3). Huge "enthusiasm gap" benefits Obama.
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 04:07 PM by jefferson_dem
Obama holds 12-point lead over McCain, poll finds

A Times/Bloomberg Poll says that in a two-man contest, 49% of respondents favor Barack Obama, while 37% support John McCain. With Ralph Nader and Bob Barr added to the mix, Obama holds 15-point edge.

By Doyle McManus, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
2:00 PM PDT, June 24, 2008

WASHINGTON -- -- Buoyed by enthusiasm among Democrats and public concern over the economy, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has captured a sizable lead over Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) at the opening of the general election campaign for president, the Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg Poll has found.

In a two-man race between the major party candidates, registered voters chose Obama over McCain by 49% to 37% in the national poll conducted last weekend.

On a four-man ballot including independent candidate Ralph Nader and Libertarian Bob Barr, voters chose Obama over McCain by an even larger margin, 48% to 33%.

Obama's advantage, bigger in this poll than in most other national surveys, appears to stem in large part from his positions on domestic issues. Both Democrats and independent voters say Obama would do a better job than McCain at handling the nation's economic problems, the public's top concern.

In contrast, many voters give McCain credit as the more experienced candidate and the one best equipped to protect the nation against terrorism -- but they rank those concerns below their worries about the economy.

Moreover, McCain suffers from a pronounced "enthusiasm gap," especially among the conservatives who usually give Republican candidates a reliable base of support. Among voters who describe themselves as conservative, only 58% say they will vote for McCain; 15% say they will vote for Obama, 14% say they will vote for someone else, and 13% say they are undecided.

By contrast, 79% of voters who describe themselves as liberal say they plan to vote for Obama.

Even among voters who say they do plan to vote for McCain, more than half say they are "not enthusiastic" about their chosen candidate; only 45% say they are enthusiastic. By contrast, 81% of Obama voters say they are enthusiastic, and almost half call themselves "very enthusiastic," a level of zeal that only 13% of McCain's supporters display.

<SNIP>

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-poll25-2008jun25,0,5763707.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yay...K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bounce? We got bounce confirmed!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's interesting how these non-tracking polls (Newsweek/Times) show a bigger Obama lead while
the tracking polls show it closer (Gallup/Rasmussen).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I do wonder how often those tracking polls switch up their respondants...
Are they just surveying the same people over and over again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Tracking polls have notoriously poor survey methodology.
Basically, they just grab the first 1000 respondents who are willing to participate. The response rate is very low. A typical non-tracking survey sample may require multiple "call backs" to the same phone number over several days until the interviewer finally reaches a living person. This is a much more sound "scientific" approach and, therefore, the poll results should better reflect the actual public opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's what I suspected. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Um, wow. This is something I've never seen before.
A Democratic candidate for president doing this well this early (or at all).

must.not.get.complacent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. True can't get complacent. Dukakis led Bush by 17-points
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks for that bit of history.
I vaguely remember that, though I was only 10. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Well Obama isn't Dukakis, and McCain is Bush II-- So, no.....
not this time.

We will win, in spite of it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrRobotsHolyOrders Donating Member (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can we stop pretending now?
Short of Obama punching an infant, this race isn't going to even be close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:20 PM
Original message
Like I said earlier Dukakis led Bush I by 17-points, it's best to run
like we are ten points down. Of course Obama is a more polished politician than Duke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. any link for that?
I heard that Dukakis NEVER lead Bush I so I am curious as to what the truth is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I found a link! Dukakis led after the convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Sad but True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrRobotsHolyOrders Donating Member (681 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm usually all for caution
And I'm all for keeping the accelerator to the floor, but I'm not going to pretend that this is going to be close.

I'm beginning to like the phrase "Mondale's Revenge."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. Don't jinx it !!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. There is a lot of work to be done.
I agree with the others who caution against overconfidence.

That being said, hopefully McLame will get less than 30% of the vote. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
36. and let's face it, which candidate is more likely to punch an infant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. DUzy!!!! DUzy over here!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. Why do you think Hillary fought so hard? She knew she too could
win if nominated. I always understood that about her. Still....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Last year they said that Oprah was making a mistake by endorsing Obama.
But, I'll bet ya dollars to donuts those same people would love to meet them both!!

She was right then - she is right now!!

Yes, we can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just confirms the Newsweek Poll. Now we know why they sent Dobson out there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. Also, polls are done to LAND LINE phone numbers.
I'd bet you 75% or more of people under 35 don't even HAVE a land line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. k&r. just confirms the Newsweek poll. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. I don't believe the poll results. And the internal numbers show the problem with their results:
In this national poll's random sample of voters, 39% identified themselves as Democrats, 22% as Republicans, and 27% as independents. In a similar poll a year ago, 33% identified themselves as Democrats, 28% as Republicans, and 30% as independents.


They polled nearly twice as many Democrats as Republicans.

Unless you really believe that the numbers of Dems versus the number of Rethuglicans has changed that much from the poll they said they did last year, then they should have realized this polling sample was off.

Yes, it's a safe bet that in any poll where you survey twice as many Democrats as Republicans, Obama will lead by a wide margin.

What's worrisome about this is that they polled 17% more Dems than Republicans, and Obama was ahead by only 12%.

39% Democrats
22% Republican
27% independent


49% Obama
37% McCain


That means that of the 27% who identified themselves as independents, Obama got 10% and McCain got 15%.

That is not good news. Especially if you don't believe there are really approximately twice as many Dems as Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Somethings not right about those numbers. What about the other 12%?
Anyway, how do you know those party numbers do not reflect the actual partisan breakdown in the public?

Check this out --- Where Have All the Republicans Gone?

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/party_affiliation/partisan_trends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. There are many more Democrats
than Republicans, that's a fact. The last figures I saw were approx 50% Dems to 35% Repubs a few months ago.

These latest figures could well show that Republican support is collapsing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Actually it has been a trend in all recent polls, more people identify themselves as democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I agree there are more Democrats. But not nearly twice as many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. You're Wrong
That's been the trend. People are running away from the GOP brand in droves and a huge Dem ID advantage is showing up in every poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. Since McCain is going to lose, the Repukes may as well vote for Bob Barr. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. Uh Oh! MSM can't dismiss the Newsweek poll as an outlier anymore!
What are they going to do now??

Anyone got any new Rev Wright tapes? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. heh, turned on David Gregory for a second
"After the commercial. McCain might...MIGHT have an enthusiasm gap when it comes to voters in November."

He SO did not want to say that line. I know, Gregory...it's painful that McCain doesn't have the same appeal to voters as he does to reporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. He looked like he was about to cry when he talked about the LA Times poll
mumbled under his breathe how the previous poll had Obama over 50% :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. Obama 48%, McLame 33%, Nader 4%, Barr 3%
From the same poll with all four candidates included. I think that number is more important, because neither Barr or Nader are going to drop out of the race, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Interesting, Barr's votes come straight from McGramps, Nader from the undecided
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
32. The poll shows McCain +17 on terrorism. Expect more "terra, terra, and terra!" It's their only card!
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 07:57 PM by flpoljunkie
They are, however, tied on who best can handle Iraq.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=agCTbSDJ83rc&refer=home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
35. "The election is the Democrats' to lose"
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 08:17 PM by senseandsensibility
from the article. :toast: And Obama is no Dukakis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC