Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We were attacked on 9-11 on republicans watch now Black says a second attack under republican watch

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
pwb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 04:52 AM
Original message
We were attacked on 9-11 on republicans watch now Black says a second attack under republican watch
will make us vote for them again?

How would a second attack during your republican administration make us want to vote for another republican? The first attack was on your watch. Now you say a second attack on your watch would help McCain?

That is like having a flat tire on your car and replacing it with a new flat tire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onetwo Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Repeat something enough and it becomes the "truth."
Repubs: The Republicans are strong on national security.

..then...

MSM: The Republicans are strong on national security.

...finally...

American citizens: The Republicans are strong on national security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pwb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. you got that right.
and good morning to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, them republicans are just so strong on national security that
they couldn't prevent the largest attack on the US since World War II even though they were warned in writing. McCain and them republicans are so savvy about military issues that they can't seem to find the criminal who planned the attack. Where in the world is Bin Laden?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. I thought the same thing. That this would help McBush would
be extraordinarily dumb. The war in Iraq is supposed to keep us fighting them there instead of here, so it would show clear failure of said war, even to those who believe it "works." How many times have repukes taken credit for their being no attack since? (As if it were not possible there just were none planned, that is based on total fear of Muslims all the time). It would be like to repukes to claim that there being no attack since is to their credit, but that a new attack would not go against them. They always claim the double standard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC