thewiseguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:51 PM
Original message |
Wouldnt it be sweet if Obama had to pick Justice Scalia's replacement? |
Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I hope it's during the first year of his first term, and that |
|
it's not because of Scalia's resignation.
|
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Clarence Thomas' replacement would make me happier... |
|
And so would Alito
and Roberts
and Stevens
and Kennedy
That makes 5. It would be a Court he picked and he'd have to share the blame or credit for the decisions he made.
But, I'd be much happier with him picking 5 than the 2 DUH-bya has picked
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. How about we impeach one or two? nt |
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Let's hope God raptures them first.
If that hasn't happened by Feb 1 then let's move Scalia and Thomas off the bench.
We should be honest with ourselves: Roberts and Alito have done little-to-nothing that we could sell to the general public that's impeachable -- I would argue it's not worth even trying.
Scalia and Thomas are different. Scalia has an attic full of skeletons in his attic that point to questionable behavior while on the Supreme Court. Thomas has less visible skeletons, but that's because he doesn't utter more than a few sentences and those are usually the same ones that Scalia has just finished saying.
|
MadMaddie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. At this point we don't know if Thomas can speak..we do know |
|
that he can sleep on the bench...just sayin...
|
Thothmes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
20. On what Constitutionally acceptable charge? |
jwirr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Here's hoping. One for Thomas wouldn't be bad either. |
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Oh dear Lord yes. How old is that freak anyway? Not old enough |
|
I guess. And knowing him, he'll stick it out for another 8 years just to spite us.
|
thewiseguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. I think he is 72. Would be surprised if he was still around after 2 terms of president Obama |
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. They need to set a mandatory federal retirment age of 70 for all non-elected |
|
federal officials.
This would include judges, lawyers, bureaucratic officials, cabinet officials, etc.
The only people unaffected would be the President, the Vice-President and Congress
|
thewiseguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. That would not be too good for us |
|
Stevens is 88 and Ginsburg is 75.
|
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
it would also remove Scalia and I think Thomas would also be out during an Obama administration
I'm looking at this being something they enact next year or in 2010. I'm not stupid enough to want it right now.
A law like this would keep people like Cheney, Rumsfeld and the neo-cons from Reagan's administration from being resurrected as some cabinet-level official.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Jonathan Turley, when the opportunity arises. nt |
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Who washes Nino Scalia's underwear? The skid marks would tell all |
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
10. From your typing fingers to God's ears, please, oh, PLEASE! LOL! nt |
Parche
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Anton The Con
:grr: :grr: :hi:
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I'd rather it be Thomas and Kennedy |
|
and for Scalia to be forced to sit there on a liberal court writing nutty dissenting opinions for 20 years :rofl:
|
Peregrine Took
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Just replacing Stevens and others will destroy him. Can't wait to see Fatso |
|
forced into the hated minority.
|
LisaM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message |
19. It would be sweet if his replacement was chosen by a task force |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |