Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Daily News: Michelle Obama's the belle of gay Democrats ball

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:25 PM
Original message
NY Daily News: Michelle Obama's the belle of gay Democrats ball
Edited on Thu Jun-26-08 11:26 PM by Stephanie




http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/06/26/2008-06-26_michelle_obamas_the_belle_of_gay_democra.html

Michelle Obama's the belle of gay Democrats ball
BY CELESTE KATZ
DAILY NEWS POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT

Thursday, June 26th 2008, 10:22 PM

A week after her smash appearance on "The View," Michelle Obama returned here Thursday night to win more kudos - this time from well-heeled gay activists at a Waldorf-Astoria party fund-raiser.

The wife of Democratic candidate Barack Obama spoke before the Democratic National Committee's Gay and Lesbian Leadership Council about civil rights struggles "from Selma to Stonewall."

She showcased what she called her husband's long record of pushing for equal treatment for all, spinning his refusal to endorse gay marriage by noting he supports civil unions and would let states decide what's best.





link

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh, and that IS a fantastic dress!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Great dress but unflattering picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed. There were only two and the other was no better >
The AP could have done a better job.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. Love the neckline
:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. oh sure and btw no gay marriage in the obama platform - just send checks n cash nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. he is free to practice his religion, as long as it doesn't interfere in his policy. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Would you rather have a candidate
who voted for the Defense of Marriage Act and endorsed the don't ask, don't tell policy? It's clear to even armchair political pundits out there that gay marriage will come about from the legislative and judicial branches at the state level, not the executive branch at the national level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. like civil rights for say...african americans? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The executive branch doesn't decide if gay marriage is legal
We're electing a President, not a dictator. It's the legislative and judicial branches of government that decide this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. you said its a state issue. do you feel that civil rights for african americans was as well? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I never said that it's a state issue
I said that's the only way it will be changed over the next 10-15 years. Obama can't just issue an edict to allow all gay marriage. President does not equal dictator.

Plus the opponents to this viewpoint won't recognize marriage as a Constitutionally-protected civil right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Obama is an opponent to the viewpoint. and a legislator. civil rights are federally protected. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Obama announced that he supports the CA court decision
Sounds like he supports the CA court decision to me. Let me break it down for you. Here are a couple of ways to get gay marriage passed:

1. Legislative branch makes it legal, appeal to judicial branch is denied. Executive branch abides by the decision.
2. Judicial branch repeals ban on gay marriage, legislative branch fails in referendum attempt during election. Executive branch abides by the decision.

Got it? Here's how gay marriage won't get passed:
1. President says that gays should marry. Announces that he is the dictator and the legislative and judicial branches don't have the power to contest him.

So to recap, Obama wouldn't have the power to eliminate gay marriage bans as President. The best you can hope for is the absence of a veto if the legislative branch passes a gay marriage ban. This is answered by Obama supporting the CA court decision.

The REAL question you should ask is what kind of judges Obama will appoint to the Supreme Court. That's the true power that he will have over issues like gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thank goodness JFK and LBJ didn't have this view on civil rights. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. LBJ authored the bill that he signed?
Funny, I always thought that it was Congress that authored that bill. Silly me.

If you want to be politically effective, you need to understand how politics work. Call your Congressman to get them to pass a bill making it illegal to ban gay marriage.

Don't be fooled by the Dumbya years. Obama believes that there are three branches of government. It's the legislative branch that needs to pass a bill legalizing gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. John F. Kennedy submitted the bill that would become the Civil Rights Act of 1964 on June 19th 1963.
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 12:43 AM by IndianaJones
LBJ bullied the bill to passage after JFK's death.

If you want to comment on civil rights, you need to learn the history of the civil rights movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. DOMA
House: 342 yeas, 67 nays. Senate: 85 yeas, 14 nays. President Clinton signed the bill into law in 1996.

Obama needs Congress to get more on board if he's going to have any shot at this. As long as people elect politicians that view gay marriage this way, it will never be accomplished. Civil unions are hanging on a thread as it is already. Even the CA ruling isn't in the clear yet.

Also, gay marriage isn't considered to be an important election issue for most Americans, which is where your comparison falls flat. As long as it is viewed as a wedge issue and not an issue of great national importance, it won't be passed on the national level. Hate the message not the messenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. If you are referring to Hillary she did neither one of those
DOMA was passed in 1996, when she was first lady, and she has repeatedly called for repeal of DADT which also happened when she was first lady. She isn't pure on this issue but you are making stuff up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. .



http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid53048.asp

Obama Holds LGBT Fund-raiser in NYC

Sen. Barack Obama waded deep into Clinton territory Thursday evening at a private LGBT fund-raiser in New York City where the price of admission was $2,300 per person.

Held at the apartment of GLSEN founder and executive director Kevin Jennings and his partner, Jeff Davis, the event drew about 125 people and raised $170,000. No press were admitted, but based on several accounts, attendees were struck by the Illinois senator’s candor as well as his fluency with LGBT issues.

“I’ve been to many events over the past 10 years of candidates running for office,” said Corey Johnson, one of the hosts, “This was the most forthright, eloquent, and detailed stuff I’ve heard from a politician .”

Molly Lenore, 43, compared Obama’s discussion of the LGBT community to the speech he gave about race in America last week. “During his race speech, everybody said afterward that he treated the American people like adults, and I felt like that’s what he did,” said Lenore, who is transgender and an Obama supporter. “I might not agree 100%, but I want to have an intelligent conversation with somebody.”

According to those present, Obama spoke for about 30 to 35 minutes about queer issues and then fielded questions, most of which were not LGBT-specific.

Johnson, who is 25, has supported Obama for about a year but prefaced his remarks by saying he has never been an “Obama-phile.” He said the senator addressed some of the most contentious LGBT issues without prompting, such as same-sex marriage and the inclusion of transgender people in the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. In fact, those were the two issues Sen. Obama singled out as being potential disappointments to the LGBT community right now, while he signaled that a hate-crimes bill could likely be passed and signed into law and that repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” might be on the horizon.

According to several sources, including Johnson and Lenore, Obama said he did not think it was “politically feasible” to secure marriage rights for same-sex couples in the country at this point. Sen. Obama acknowledged that the community wanted full marriage rights but said that he favored civil unions for now while leaving open the possibility that his position might evolve in the future.

In terms of ENDA, Obama said he supported an ENDA that included transgender protections but that he didn’t believe a fully inclusive bill had enough votes to pass the Senate at this time.

“I don’t agree -- I think we’re much stronger united as a community,” Lenore said of keeping transgender protections in the bill. “But I do understand the politics and I do appreciate the fact that he said, hey, it’s not going to pass in this political climate. Many other politicians haven’t really done that. They make decisions but they never really address the trans community.”

Should he become president, Obama said his first three priorities would be designing a safe exit strategy for Iraq, working on affordable health care, and addressing greenhouse gases and the environment.

As Sen. Obama made his way to the door, Johnson said he asked the senator directly to do more interviews with the gay press, citing the fact that he has conducted only one interview with an LGBT outlet during his presidential campaign. “I said, ‘Your speech tonight was so moving to all of us, the way you spoke about our community. You need to do more ,” recalled Johnson. “And he said, ‘You’re right, absolutely. We do need to do more with the LGBT press.’” (Kerry Eleveld, The Advocate)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. Obama in Equality
Senator Obama gave a good written reply type of interview with Equality, the magazine of the Human Rights Campaign. It was good. Nuanced. Anyone who cares about these issues should read it carefully. Cyndy Lauper on the cover....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. It doesn't seem to be online
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. None in McCain's either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Oh yeah, that's a real winning position in the general election
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 12:21 AM by cbc5g
:eyes:

more purist bullshit from people who don't understand the American electorate. And even if he were President he wouldn't be able to pass it anyways...we have a thing called seperation of powers.

Let states decide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Are you ever gonna let go? I'm sure it's your dream that Obama get
dragged down in these wedge issues just so you get the satisfaction of saying "I told you so". But isn't Hillary's stance on this issue the same as Obama's? Let's not be hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. Don't expect there to be one either. We actually want to win this election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. I like that pic
Looks like she's really connecting to the crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC