Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pay Mark Penn's bill? Compare it to what Axelrod's firm, AKP Media & Messaging has charged Obama.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:30 AM
Original message
Pay Mark Penn's bill? Compare it to what Axelrod's firm, AKP Media & Messaging has charged Obama.
The Hillary Clinton campaign has already paid Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates $13,962,190 in 2008, yet she owes him another $4,612,431.61, according to the latest FEC report.

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/M6/C00431569/D_DEBTS_C00431569.html

Compare this to what the Obama campaign has paid David Alexrod's firm for the same period. Axelrod is Obama's chief media and political advisor. Axelrod's firm, AKP Media & Messaging, also includes the services of David Plough, the campaign manager. AKP received a total of $849,320.37 in 2008, and there is no outstanding debt, unlike Penn's outstanding $4,612,431.61 bill to the Clinton campaign at the end of May, 2008--according to the FEC link below:

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/M6/C00431445/D_DEBTS_C00431445.html

Time for the Clinton campaign to take Penn Schoen & Berland to court for campaign malpractice and get this bloated bill drastically reduced or eliminated.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why do you feel this is helpful, especially on the day of the Unity meetup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Penn's outrageous bloated salary cannot be accepted nor paid. It must be reduced or eliminated.
Hillary Clinton was very poorly served by this man and his firm, and we ought not to make the likes of him whole.

And I don't think her supporters feel any differently about Mark Penn and his services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. SOOOO true, I think it would've been a lot closer if she was served better by Penn et al
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. you know that amount isn't Penn's salary, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. But that is what his firm billed Hillary Clinton. We need an accounting of these charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. Yes
his firm that did all the polling for her campaign, as well as other services. It's not Mark Penn's personal salary.

And why do "we" need an accounting of those charges?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. IIRC his firm also did the purchasing of the media buys.
TV time ain't cheap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #47
61. Ummm...
because Hillary wants it paid off by Obama supporters, we should at least know what we are paying off.

Typical post by MF












Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #61
66. You're not going to contribute
so why are you owed anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. already did.
The sooner Hillary is paid off, the sooner we won't have to be strong armed by her.

Granted it was only 20 dollars ...anyway...you lose again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Are you a Penn supporter now..
:rofl:


GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. evidently Penn also paid venders for her
so much of the money owed to Penn is really owed to vendors. Of course, you and the author of the piece chose to tell a different, less accurate story. One wonders why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. How much though? Even if it's half of what she paid that's still almost 10 times what Obama spent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. List the vendors, if you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. The chief strategist paid the vendors?!?!?
I very much doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. It has been posted here, repeatedly
I will try to find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Post 9 of this thread and note the icon of the poster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I have no idea
about the inner workings of a campaign, but it seems to me that the campaign manager or somebody in that line of command should be in charge of vendors, not somebody in charge of strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. My best guess is that he was in charge of fundraising events and advertising
and she billed that stuff through his firm using his accountants instead of hiring hers. I have no clue how common that would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nbsmom Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. It is SOP
It's my understanding that it's not unlike how advertising agencies and general contractors work:

The agency/contractor vets/chooses the vendors.
The agency/contractor in return for fronting the money, takes a percentage of the money being paid to the vendors. (Does this influence the selection of the vendors? Of course.)
The agency/contractor remains on the hook for the amounts owed the vendors until all costs/overruns are paid.

(It always amazes me when people complain about how much their contractor charges them as opposed to original estimates, because there is typically no incentive to keep costs down if you're getting a percentage of the total amount billed. I guess most people don't realize this.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. And Penn still had other clients. This was a part-time gig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. look at post 13
which was posted before your post, it should be noted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I was about to edit after posting, but then I decided not to because I noticed the link was just...
to some DUer who also had no link. So I figured I'd leave this here and check on it when you have a good link. Now I'll go see what you've posted over in that subthread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Here is one from media matters
http://mediamatters.org/items/200804070008

MYERS: Well, you know, I think that's been overblown. Because a lot of the money went through his polling firm but was then doled out to vendors for various ad buys and things like that. I think that they capped how much they were going to make it. I think it's $250,000. You'll have to check me on that. So he's -- so those figures that say he made $10 million are incorrect. Nonetheless, he's made plenty of money. It's not about money. It's about winning the presidency. And I think Senator Clinton has to take the responsibility now. She's left with the aftermath. Look, there's still a question about, what does it mean he's been sort of demoted? Does that mean --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Pretty vague.
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 01:17 PM by flpoljunkie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. actually it is pretty clear
capped at 250k paid rest to vendors. That seems pretty clear. I am presuming that he got more in the last months but that still gives a nice ball park figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Capped at $250k for what and for what period of time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Given the date of the statement
I am presuming Apr 30. Assuming it doubles to 500k, which sounds unlikely, that puts him in league with Axelrod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. Evidently....
Is that what passes for evidence in lala land?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Almost 19 million dollars for REALLY bad advice and non existant leadership. I feel for Hillary...
...thinking about it, she thought she surrounded herself with some good people but sleazy ass'd Penn wasn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
37. mark penn, who infamously, said
"being human is overrated" when it was suggested they show Hillary's softer side.

The whiner, who defending, his "campaign strategist" resume said "I wanted to go negative sooner".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peaches2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama should ignore her $ problems
Why is anyone involved with Hillary's debts except Hillary. She spent $$$ foolishly; her problem. It's ludicrous that Obama is lehimself anywhere near this. If Hillary can't repay herself the millions she lent her campaign, TS for her. She's not a good steward of her own money, much less ours. Obama better stand on his own without sucking up to the Clintons and pretty damn soon or he will be seen as weak and pandering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. He will. He can't say it in the press but her problems are not his problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Clinton supporters are the ones probably most upset with Penn. The Obama supporters
should just ssshhhhhhhh about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. Penn did do a very bad job
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 09:57 AM by Alcibiades
Gave the Clintons bad advice at every turn. I cannot think of any reason why Penn would pay vendors rather than having the campaign do so directly--this is less transparent.

That being said, given that Clinton desires to have Democratic donors pay the bill rather than repay the money she supposedly lent herself, why not have the Obama campaign pay it, and she can turn around and ask her donors if it is OK to use the general election money she's raised for the nominees campaign. Some may balk, and that's their right, btu these are Democratic donors, they've presumably already given the money, and so many would be willing to redirect it to the nominee.

Just a suggestion, though all the discussions between the Obama fundraising folks and the Clinton folks suggest to me that this is something like what they are working on anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
51. Hillary can't repay herself.
No individual -- not even the candidate him/herself -- can donate more than $2,300 to a campaign. So Hillary and Bill together can only give her campaign $4,600. That certainly won't cover the campaign's debt to the Clintons. Plus I read somewhere that it's not her loans that she's trying to recoup. She's trying to pay the bills she owes to others.

Thankfully the law also doesn't allow out contributions to Obama to be transferred to Clinton. So we don't have to worry about that.

I donated to Hillary the day she gave her concession speech. I'll donate again next month. But most of my contribution money is going to Obama, the DNC, and downticket Dem candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. Can someone tell me if this is true?
Andrea Mitchell the other day said that it is "tradition" that the nominee helps the losing candidate with campaign debt.

I, for one, never heard that one before.

And I, for one, don't want my Obama contributions (as modest they are) going to pay off Mark Penn, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. It is, but thanks to Mark Penn, Clinton's primary debt is unprecedented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. It's also tradition that campaigns don't spend extensive amounts of time running on credit.
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 11:15 AM by JVS
Traditionally, when you're out of money, it's time to start wrapping things up, and you might have some debt in there. You don't launch a whole new offensive on the rationale that if you lose the sucker you're attacking will pick up the tab. Well, you don't if you have a shred of class anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. Don't worry
They can't move your money. All Obama can do is work with and encourage his supporters to fill the gap.
And afaik he has alaready asked the ones that has maxed out their contribution to him, to help Hillary if possible. And specifically not asked people that has donated smaller amounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. If Penn paid the vendors then I'm sure his invoice includes a
hefty administrative fee - anywhere between 7%-10% over the vendor invoice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. Whether Penn's bill is itemized is a question in itself. List of all other vendor debt link below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yeah, I definitely think there needs to be some
re-negotiation of that tab if Obama is going to help pay it.

Sorry Penn, you lose; you lose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
33. May I just say, money aside, Axelrod is a genius.... One of the great moves by Obama...
One great move of many....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #33
43. I concur with your assessment. He's a very decent guy, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yeswecanseattle Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
35. Mark Penn only care about him self. DR wants Obama to win. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
41. Economically challenged, fee bloated
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
44. I had heard on MSNBC that most of the debt to Mark Penn is to vendors
I think he paid some vendors up front and Hillary didn't reimburse him for those payments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. "Vendors?" Need more specifics than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. I think when 'vendor is used by the media pundits
They mean people not officially associated with the campaign. So under that definition debt to Penn's organization for compensation for their WORK wouldn't fall under this category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. HUFFPO compared Penn's and Axelrod's firms' expenses in Feb.'08.
It is not uncommon for candidates to spend their cash on the firms and companies associated with their advisers. And the elongated primary, combined with the historic fundraising totals, have pushed campaign expenditures increasingly higher. Still, the totals taken in by Penn and, to a lesser extent, Axelrod represent significant hauls for a year-plus work.

Broken down by purpose the Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates's receipts read like this:

• $1.7+ million for consulting, roughly $530,000 of which have come in the last quarter;
• $2.6+ million for mail expenses;
• $15,000 for travel;
• $7,000 for printing;
• $4,500 on photography.

As for AKP, the rough tallies breakdown as such:

• $17,000 for mail services;
• $530,000 for media consulting;
• $140,000 for activities deemed "miscellaneous media;"
• $335,000 for broadcast media.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/06/mark-penns-firm-paid-4_n_85192.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. The mail expenses breakdown is appalling
Perhaps Penn had all of the Hillary flyers FedEx'ed overnight? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Why is it appalling? You need to do some math
Edited on Sat Jun-28-08 08:02 PM by bamalib
There were about 40 million votes in the primary. Mail would have been sent to at least three times that number (probably a lot more). So that means the mail expenses represents about 2 cents a voter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Appalling that there is such a huge differential between Penn and Axelrod
Duh. :eyes:

Perhaps the lesson for Hillary to learn is to not put all of your eggs in one basket, especially if the basket wants to coat its straws in gold. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. So you seriously think Obama only had $18,000 in mail expenses?
Duh. Obviously the mail expenses are part of someone else's bill. Don't be ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Grassroots support vs. big money Penn services
'Nuff said. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. You really do believe the bill was $18,000.
One day you will be allowed out or thrown out of your mother's basement. I hope the shock of the real world is not too much for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. Well, it definitely wasn't $22 million of debt
Maybe someday someone will show you the real world where you pay as you go and not just mass up as much debt as possible. Maybe that's how you live your life, but not me. Any of the campaigns you worked for that much in the red? I'm guessing they didn't win... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. You ever work in a professional services firm?
Those guys stuffing envelopes are probably billing $200 or more per hour. I laugh at anyone trying to justify that amount when compared to Obama's highly efficient, non-NY-DC advisers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. Thanks LittleBlue!
Grassroots support beat big money Penn in the primaries, hands down. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. You think two cents a voter for mailing is high? LOL
Unlike the posters on this board I have worked in many campaigns and have been a candidate three times. I know what things cost, believe me. I am still filing out FEC forms and it has been almost four years since the last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Well, I do believe $22 million in debt is high
when you don't win the nomination. Your glibness shows why not enough people voted for you. :rofl:

Just playing with you. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Actually I won one out of the three.
Where I live that percentage is not that bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. If only you were a baseball player
A .333 batting average would put you in the All-Star game. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
56. Piss away money. Ask for a bailout.
Where have I heard that M.O. before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC