Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary for VP!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:44 PM
Original message
Hillary for VP!
No one better!

God, what a great president she'd have made...and may still make someday.

But for this election, with Obama the nominee, the strongest ticket is with her as his running mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I second that....
Absolutely no one better!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I'll third that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
38. and 4th.......
:donut:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #38
85. She'd be terrific and would help pull in a lot of votes. Some
people here don't realize that she has been an inspiration to many many women of all ages and ethnicities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
135. I'll 5th
Though Biden and Edwards would also be good choices. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #135
136. I'll 6th............
That doesn't sound right. LOL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #136
162. lol
Do I hear a 7th anyone? Come on... Come on... !!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemUnity08 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Totally agree with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
55. Hey, welcome to DU!
Love your username.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
79. Yes, welcome! I love your member name, too!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry, will not happen.
She will be given another spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, it isn't
Democrats will vote overwhelmingly for the Democratic nominee, regardless; Hillary alienates many independents. Not 'the strongest ticket', by a longshot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. I just don't see it happening.
But I've been wrong before and I'm sure I'll be wrong again, so who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. We need change. Hillary isn't change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. are you saying that
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 01:08 PM by cricket08
Hillary is 4 more years of Bush. WTF. Of course she is change. She is a DEMOCRAT and a damned good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I didn't compare her to * but she represents insider corporate DLC Dems.
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 01:42 PM by mod mom
You might be well served by reading this letter from a Wellesley College Alumna :



RE: Open Letter to Hillary Clinton From a Wellesley College Alumna, by Linn Cohen-Cole. Thought you all might be interested in reading this open letter to Hillary Clinton, by Linn Cohen-Cole, on the Clinton's ties to Monsanto, promotion of genetically engineered crops and rBGH, recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone.
Open Letter to Hillary Clinton From a Wellesley College Alumna
February 19, 2008

-snip

You have connections to Monsanto through the Rose Law Firm where you worked and through Bill who hired Monsanto people for central food-related roles. Your Orwellian-named “Rural Americans for Hillary” was planned withTroutman Sanders, Monsanto’s lobbyists.

Genetic engineering and industrialized food and animal production all come together at the Rose Law Firm, which represents the world’s largest GE corporation (Monsanto), GE’s most controversial project (DP&L’s - now Monsanto’s - terminator genes) , the world’s largest meat producer (Tyson), the world’s largest retailer and a dominant food retailer (Wal-Mart) .

The inbred-ness of Rose’s legal representation of corporations which own controlling interests in other corporations there and of corporate boards sharing members who are also shareholders of each other’s corporations there, is so thorough that it is hard to capture. Jon Jacoby, senior executive of the Stephens Group - one of the largest institutional shareholders of Tyson Foods, Walmart, DP&L - is also Chairman of the Board of DP&L and arranged the Wal-Mart deal. Jackson Stephens’ Stephens Group staked Sam Walton and financed Tyson Foods. Monsanto bought DP&L. All represented at Rose.

You didn’t just work there, you made friends. That shows in the flow of favors then and since. You were invited onto Walmart’s board, you were helped by a Tyson executive to make commodity trades (3 days before Bill became governor), netting you $100,000, Jackson Stephens strongly backed Bill for Governor, and then for President (donating $100,000).

Food and friends, in Clinton terms: Bill’s appointed friend Mike Espy, Secretary of Agriculture, who immediately significantly weakened federal chicken waste and contamination standards, opening the door to major expansion of Tyson’s chicken factory farms. Espy resigned, indicted for accepting bribes, illegal contributions, money laundering, illegal dispersal of USDA subsidies, …. Tyson Foods was the largest corporate offender.

-snip

http://pittsburgh.indymedia.org/news/2008/03/29083.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Obama has his own corporate friends
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. Not all corporations are bad but there are some very noxious companies (read the letter
I posted in my thread above) and individuals associated with the Clintons:

With Friends Like These ...
by Marin Cogan, Melanie Mason, and Barron YoungSmith
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Clintons' shadiest donors.
Post Date Monday, February 04, 2008

It's not that we expect politicians to have squeaky-clean donor lists. You try running for office without, at one point or another, taking money from someone you probably shouldn't. Even Barack Obama, Mr. Clean, has Tony Rezko. But the Frank Giustra-Kazakhstan-Uranium affair, blown open by The New York Times last week, serves as a reminder that the relationship between the Clintons and money has not always been lily-white. Here, a guide to the unsavory characters who have been associated with Bill and Hillary Clinton.


http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=076fd56f-4aca-4683-a9d1-3c55d748946e



After Mining Deal, Financier Donated to Clinton

By JO BECKER and DON VAN NATTA Jr.
Published: January 31, 2008
Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton.

-snip

"Kazakhstan’s president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev, whose 19-year stranglehold on the country has all but quashed political dissent."

"Mr. Nazarbayev walked away from the table with a propaganda coup, after Mr. Clinton expressed enthusiastic support for the Kazakh leader’s bid to head an international organization that monitors elections and supports democracy."

-snip

Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges.

LINK:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/us/politics/31donor.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. We need real change. Hillary ran an old fashioned Republican campaign.....
A PUMA member is on TV now saying that she might vote for McCain. Apparently she thinks Hillary is closer in her politics to McCain than to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #42
80. In your dreams.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #42
137. And that's Hillary's fault, how??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
151. Bush endorsed her, what's that tell you?
:shrug:

Rove sings her praises, ick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
78. She certainly is
without a doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
141. RIGHT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rene Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
155. Change what???? That'ts what W said in 1999. Look what we got for 8 years!
aaaggghhhh this obama panderer, who doesn't know how or what to vote on is a ridiculous choice for prez. The wind shifts and so does he....fool/tool. Look out sheeple--you asked for a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Edwards is better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Been there, done that! AG would be perfect for Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. We need a VP who isn't too old to run in 2016. Edwards beats Clinton there
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 01:04 PM by JVS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
74. Edwards is good.
I would prefer Hillary Clinton, but Edwards would make me very happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obama: "She rocks. She rocks." Yes, she does!
And speaking of both Clintons: "The American people need their service and their wisdom."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Fine by me
A couple of weeks ago he would of looked weak if he took her. Taking her now does not leave that impression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Stop the madness
My god...some of you people are just determined to lose us another election, aren't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes they are...
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 12:54 PM by YOY
Some of it from real Hillary supporters and some of it from "Operation Chaos" leftovers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
83. Attitudes like yours make it
more likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #83
88. Clinton as VP is a losing bet.
We have a lot of momentum on our side...why kill it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #88
89. II's a view
like most others - held with conviction but unbacked by evidence. Actually - there probably is some data out there on the topic. I don't know what it is. Issue is - she is extraordinarily capable and therefore could be seen as an enormous asset. But not , of course, by those to whom anything Hillary is anathema. So, there you have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #89
90. You have to remember that this is now the GENERAL election.
Clinton's only liked by a little over half of Dems. Indys and Repubs generally dislike her...and they make up about 60% of the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #90
92. As I said - opinion unsupported by legitmate data
(You have to remember that this not only a general election but also that you do not have the last word in authoritative predictive information. And of course such information would be unreliable as opinions shift. However, I think there is little on which to base your conviction. And also that there is as much to support many quite different views.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #92
97. Do you consider this Quinnipiac poll illegitimate?
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x2882.xml?ReleaseID=1187

(snip)

While Democrats support the idea, independent voters in each state say Obama should not choose Sen. Clinton as his vice presidential running mate. Results are:

Florida: Democrats want Clinton on the ticket 57 - 33 percent while Republicans are opposed 59 - 17 percent and independents oppose it 46 - 37 percent;
Ohio: Democrats want Clinton for Vice President 58 - 31 percent, but Republicans say no 60 - 19 percent and independents turn thumbs down 47 - 31 percent;
Pennsylvania: Democrats say yes to Clinton 60 - 31 percent, while Republicans say no 63 - 20 percent and independents nix the idea 49 - 36 percent.

"If Sen. Obama seriously is thinking about picking Sen. Clinton as his running mate, these numbers might cause him to reconsider. The people who really matter come November - independent voters - turn thumbs down on the idea. And, many say they are less likely to vote for him if he puts her on the ticket," Brown added.

(snip)



The poll shows that in several crucial swing stated Clinton as VP would HURT Obama.

Hillary as VP is McCain's best hope right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #97
102. No
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
139. Yeah, because 18 million people didn't vote for Hillary, right?
Some of you need to move on with your dislike of her. Hillary won half of the Democratic vote and it would be a winning combination. Each half of the party would get their candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. she's just a bad match for a "change" President.....

Sorry.


It's not going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemUnity08 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. No it not
I think it a good ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yeswecanseattle Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. I disagree.
For one main reason: Polarization
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
103. Polarization ? Explain please.
The fact still remains that Clinton pulled almost the same amount of votes as Obama did. The only argument against this merger appears to be that independent voters and republicans would not support such a ticket, yet I have not seen any concrete evidence that that would be the case except for a couple of questionable polls and a lot of speculation from biased TV bobble heads. (And of course the Clinton disrespectors on this forum).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yeswecanseattle Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #103
132. It's more than a few questionable polls that prove my point
Her negatives have always been high. Why not avoid that risk and choose someone less polarizing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. She's far too hawkish on foreign policy for my taste
but I think she has some good ideas on domestic issues. I think if Obama assigned her as V.P. to tackle certain problems (he's going to really have his hands full he'll need an active Vice President) such as health care and education, she could be very useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. The 1,807th post on DU saying Hillary for VP
:rofl:

:rofl:

:rofl:


Good thing Senator Obama gets to make that decision :)



GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. If she were going to be, they'd have announced it already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. I disagree...
I think they will campaign together and announce it at the convention (if she is his pick).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good speeches and nice photo OPs do not make a strong ticket
The problems with the ticket aren't negated by the two of them looking good at a campaign appearance.

He should have a strong foreign policy experience VP.

No extra oppo baggage with a VP who has more vetting issues than he does.

No IWR baggage.

No drama. (NO BILL)

That's just a few things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. Can't risk driving Independents to Grandpa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
104. What in the world leads you to believe that independent voters
would consider voting for a republican moreso/or over that a Democrat? That is a non argument unless someone can show concrete proof that this is the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #104
111. See post #97. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #111
113. Is that it ? What more have you got ?
Concrete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #113
117. It's more than enough.
For people who don't have blinders on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #117
120. Just as I thought, pure pontifical speculation and a poll
conducted by an obscure college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #120
131. LOL. "obscure college"?
You think Quinnipiac is not a reliable pollster?

No wonder you want Hillary as VP candidate. You need to seriously read up on current politics and learn something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. not going to happen, there are too many good candidates to choose from
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
26. Good god, no.
We would lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. the change candidate
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 02:16 PM by noiretblu
should pick a vp that represents change, e.g., a woman. clinton is a good choice for demcoratic support. however, i suspect the change candidate's pick will be more of an attraction for swing voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
105. All Clinton has to do then is claim 'change' . OK, that's easy.
Rhetoric always works, yes? "I am Hillary Clinton and I represent 'change'. And hope."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. That's the ticket for me.
Not sure it will happen, and I will go with whatever ticket we have, but I would love this ticket.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. ..........
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #40
72. Back atcha, rodeo!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #40
140. R.I.P. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
86. Together they could pull in the votes. She would bring a lot
of sparkle and glitz to the campaign. People, especially young people really go for that. How much more interesting to have an attractive spirited woman on the ticket. How about two political minorities on the top ticket? Never before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. Two senators on the ticket = McLoon landslide
That particular senator on this ticket = party suicide. And I don't mean the 'Pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
30. hey, great post. .
:hi: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
33. Because she did so well in the primaries.
That's just the sort of poll plummeting, debt skyrocketing, gaffe machine we need in the Obama campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. Yes, she did -- getting approximately as many votes as he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #49
101. And if she is on the Presidential ticket she will still get those
votes. 2 + 2 = 4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourPieRun Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
54. she got as many votes as (or more than) he did, in case you forgot, and he got his winning delegate
edge from caucuses and open primaries, which i think you'll have to admit, don't translate into much in november.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
65. she won the popular vote so -yes she did well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #65
71. Great.
Then they can all donate a dollar and pay off her debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #65
145. Quit with the fucking lying ..she did not win the popular
vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
34. I sincerely hope not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. nope, you're not allowed to mention that site, as it turns out.
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 03:20 PM by Lerkfish
and, well, I was hoping that if you people remained here it would be to promot unity instead of browbeating us to accept Clinton as VP.

I see that I was wrong, and will have to restart my ignore list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Presumably, Ma'am, You Would Vote For The Ticket If Sen. Clinton Got The V.P. Nod?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. sigh...I'm a sir. your gender confusion is tedious.
and that is attacking me personally as another way to browbeat me into submission.

I DO find it amusing you are asking ME to perform a loyalty oath.


whatever, if you will peruse all my previous posts, you will see I have always said I would vote for the nominee and his VP.
I have a preference for and against VP, but that doesn't matter.

now that you've made this about ME in order to intimidate me from pointing out when we are being infiltrated by those who would disparage the nominee.


predictable and consistent, at least, to the very last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Mixed You Up With Someone Of a Similar Name Recently Encountered, Sir
These things will happen.

Happy to hear you would certainly vote for the ticket should Sen. Clinton receive the Party's nomination for Vice President. Odds that she will seem fairly decent at present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. since your whole method is to identify gender, whether a poster wishes it or not
it would seem to behoove you to simply click on their profile first.

and btw, I'd prefer you not refer to me by gender at all, if I could state a preference. I believe people's desire on how they should be addressed is a simple courtesy that everyone deserves.

thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Hair-Shirts, Sir, Are Next Aisle Over: Not My Department
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. so you refuse to be courteous under any circumstance?
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 04:13 PM by Lerkfish
even when asked?

and you refuse to apologize, even when you offend (my interpretation of your hairshirt reference)?

my, arent' you just the bee's knees of human relations? why the hell are you a mod, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #53
124. I think it's nice that the Magistrate is so polite - we could use more of it in society.
But regarding the topic, Lerkfish, I will go on record as saying I would be fine and perhaps even enthusiastic with Hillary as VP. I am not a fan, and my argument has always been that she has too much baggage. But if Obama and his committee feel she is the one, then I am all for it. Time has passed and the country is ripe for change. I didn't like her vote on Iraq, but I think alot of people feel duped on that. It is time to come together and get our ticket elected. There is too much on the line this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #124
129. Polite is good. Civility is good.
"Sir" and "ma'am" are unnecessary and sometimes perceived at outright offensive. (A minor matter - but there you have it.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #129
152. Don't pick on Magistrate. He has been on this forum for a long
time and I don't remember anyone ever objecting to his politeness before. I, for one, appreciate it mightily. It is a good thing to be nice and respectful to someone whether you agree with them or not. Magistrate and I don't agree on some things, but I can always depend on him being fair. It's a joy to share this forum with him. In my humble opinion, the world needs more just like him.

It appears to me that you are attempting to change the subject, and/or hijack the thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #51
125. I agree. Gender identification is not necessary . . .
that's why my profile says 'undeclared'. I despise being called 'sir' or 'ma'am'. Because of my voice, I am often mis-gendered on the telephone and at drive throughs. And as here, generally no apology is forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #51
161. I recommend putting him on ignore
It's better to miss the obnoxiousness completely. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. What is it with the sir and ma'am stuff anyway?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. It's nicer than asshole and fuck face?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. This is VERY true but are those the only alternatives when it
comes to using words other people find unnecessary, offensive or annoying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. if a person requests NOT to be addressed that way, but is anyways, it amounts to the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. I agree. While such words can not rise to level
of the foul mouthed abuse sometimes found on DU, it certainly amounts to the level of offensive when such a request has been made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Oh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. 'Tis an ongoing issue
Hey - as far as the sig goes...are you getting married?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Last Saturday
I guess I should update my sig line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Hurray. Congratulations!
Cheers matey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. well, when a person requests not to be addressed that way, and the other
person refuses that request., its a simple FU to the original person, its rude, and intentional flamebait at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #61
73. It would seem so.
Some habits may be hard to break and behaviors hard to unlearn but surely it would not be so hard. perhaps there is not a clear understanding how unwelcome it is to be addressed that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #61
126. I agree on this point also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #56
82. Good question. I personally did not appreciate the magistrate's interrogation of the poster -
Overstepped his/her position and made it abundantly clear--at least to me--that s/he expected the poster to pledge allegiance to HRC should she get the VP nod, going so far to say that it was a decent 50/50 chance--or something to that effect.

I guess I will get deleted for expressing my opinion aobut a mod overstepping.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #82
96. Where's Horace Rumpole
when you need him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #96
99. LOL - I had to Wikipedia that one! SWMBO...oh, my...! Would you believe that there is a Rumpole
Society in California?
And, I found out that this is or was broadcast in the US on PBS in the "Mystery" series. Will have to investigate.... (I would have thought that it would have been broadcast on BBC, but the site says PBS...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #99
118. It was on PBS for years
Wonderful stuff.
The old hack of the Bailey had definite opinions about judicial authorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #43
107. "you people"?
Just who are "you people"? Are you perhaps referring to Democrats who happened to disagree with you during the primary season?

Despite some very persistent people, the name of this site is still "DemocraticUnderground". "We people" have as much right to be here and put forth our opinions as you do! That is how democracy works!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
37. I cant wait till he finally picks someone.
Maybe these threads will finally stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
39. Clark nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
100. Ditto. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
44. :chuckle:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
50. no thank you, Obama will do just fine without her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #50
108. Evidently Obama needs her enough to help him by stumping
on the campaign trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #108
114. Can we say "Unity?" or, "From many we are one"? His campaign is about change. Change = Unity, IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #114
121. I was responding to the poster who claims Obama can do just
fine without Clinton. I happen to not agree, OBama needs Clinton supporter votes and sincerely doubt that OBama would refuse all the help Clinton can supply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #121
128. And I was responding to your saying that he needs her No, he doesn't , IMHO
I personally believe that their appearance together is to show that differences HAVE be put aside for the sake of the Party and for the sake of taking back the White House, which is paramount. Even Hillary knows that, and she doesn't have the luxury of withholding support - time is of the essence. While her support is still somewhat flat, it would be political suicide to go against the DP. That's why I said

support DP = support O
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
57. I'm down with that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
58. As long as it is not Lieberman or a repuke...... GEAUX OBAMA!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IowaGirl Donating Member (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
69. For our daughters, our sisters, our mothers and all the females
in this country, a woman vp would help ease their struggles in the workplace with increased credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #69
77. Just not that woman
Hillary doesn't mesh with Obama's message on so many different levels. For example, PAC/lobbyist money. Hillary says that they are Americans too. Obama even barred the DNC from taking PAC money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IowaGirl Donating Member (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #77
93. Please note this factcheck.org comment on Clinton and PACs
"In fact, only about 1 percent of all Clinton's funds have come from PACs or from current or former lobbyists, making the claim that her ads are financed by "lobbyist money" about 99 percent untrue." http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/pac-ing_heat.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #69
115. How?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
70. Don't think so
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 05:30 PM by Prophet 451
First off, Hillary has very high negatives. Half the country said they'd never vote for her before she even started campaigning (in fairness, most of that wasn't her fault) and the areas where she's strong are areas which are likely to go Democratic anyway. Also, I doubt she'd take the job.

That's not to slight Senator Clinton but I think she'd make a better contribution to an Obama administration as Sec of HHS or Education.

Actually, thinking further on that, Obama could easily assemble a team of Democratic all-stars for his Cabinet. Hillary heading up HHS, Edwards to AG or Urban Development, Gore to Interior (if he'd take it, which I doubt).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
75. Nah...Hillary for the Supreme Court!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #75
87. That's where I would love to see her.
Either that or Majority leader of the Senate.
She would do a much better job than Reid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
76. Obama needs military / foreign policy experience with his V.P. choice
Sorry, but Hillary doesn't fit that description. Everybody knows that the Republican strategy will be a combination of fear-mongering and "October surprise." The only path to victory the Republicans can see is to attack the Dem ticket as being too risky and weak on foreign policy and military issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
81. I've been saying that for ages...
...or at least since it started to become apparent she wasn't going to win the nom. I wanted her for President, but I'll be almost as happy with a unity ticket. "Hillary for VP" has traditionally been greeted by a paroxism of outrage here, but I don't really care - I think they would make an amazing team. She can be the "attack dog" when needed, while Obama can stay above the fray; they can play "good cop/bad cop" with the rethugs, each maximizing on their strengths. It's an ideal combination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #81
84.  Do you not honestly think that she would not start campaigning for her own presidency from Day 1?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #84
110. LOL
too funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #110
116. LOL....why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #116
122. It was just a funny thing to say, like we should be worrying
about Clinton's spending all her time thinking about running sometime in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #122
127. That's not what I meant at all. I meant that she would have her own agenda with the intent of under
mining and positioning herself for the Presidency. If that seems funny to you, then you must think that her presidential aspirations are over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
91. I have no complaints really as long as Bill is more supportive all for it...
Edited on Sat Jun-28-08 09:24 AM by barack the house
We must do everything in our power to get the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
94. This is a great way to bring out the Fundies for McCain.
Energizing the Repiggies is something Obama doesn't need IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
95. Obama has pledged to keep lobbyists OUT of the White House,
Why would he pick one for VP? :shrug:


The Democratic Party is a BIG TENT, but there is NO ROOM for those
who advance the agenda of THE RICH (Corporate Owners) at the EXPENSE of LABOR and the POOR.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JKaiser Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
98. Hillary is the best person for VP! Yippie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
106. That won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
109. No thanks, she doesn't bring the experience needed to the ticket...
Gen's Clark or Zinni are a must. Either will make up for Obama's lack of military experience and are damned sure more heroic than McSame ever dreamed of being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
112. No, No and No.
Especially considering the way Bill Clinton has been acting. It's easy to be a gracious winner, but how you lose tells what kind of person you really are. Bill Clinton is acting like a 5-year old who got his tricyle taken away. The last thing Obama needs is someone like that anywhere near the White House.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/barackobama/2211812/Bill-Clinton-says-Barack-Obama-must-'kiss-my-ass'-for-his-support.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
119. polls actually show her a drag on the ticket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #119
123. What polls are you refering to ?
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #123
148. is your google broken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
130. YES INDEEDY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
133. Makes way too much sense...America is into image, the absence of mere per se 'sense'...
may therefore never be :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
134. nope. We don't need Bill and Hillary trying to run things. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
138. Oh, not this shit again! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
142. WRONG...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mloutre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
143. *yawn* are we still listening to this?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
144. I'm game if Obama's game!
Hillary's one of the best!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
146. Yarp!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
147. she's poison & Obama is too smart to kowtow to pressure
she lost and it's time for some people to let it go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
149. Screw that. Hillary represents the past...a past where Dems bent over willingly for the Repukes.
No more. Enough with the DINOs who have brought our party to ruin. F**k her.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-04-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
150. Ask yourself
If it wasn't for bill, would any of you even know who hillery was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #150
153. If it weren't for Hillary, nobody would know who Bill was.
You should never negate the power of a wife. Bill would certainly agree with me. She's saved his ass on many occasions. Not to say that I want her as VP. I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #150
158. If it was not for Hillary you would not know Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
154. A thousand times NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
156. She is the best!
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ioo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
157. Jesus Christ I hope not.
Sorry but there are far better folks out there for the job. Let's put her somewhere where she can do some good for America and the world, not the DO NOTHING job of VP. Sec Def or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
159. I love the little ways Clinton supporters have found to re-live primary season
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elkston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-05-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
160. I agree, they look great together.
I want to see more embracing, touching, kissing, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC