Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton Invokes the "Bad Dreams" of a Former P.O.W.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 03:42 AM
Original message
Bill Clinton Invokes the "Bad Dreams" of a Former P.O.W.
Former President Bill Clinton spoke at the Aspen Ideas Festival where, in a conversation about global issues and philanthropy with Aspen Institute vice president Jane Wales, he made one comment that at least one attendee -- The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg -- took as a shot at presumptive GOP presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

In a conversation about former South African president Nelson Mandela, Clinton talked about Mandela's ability to forgive his captors.

"Didn't you hate them?" Clinton recalled asking Mandela privately, referring to Mandela's final steps as a prisoner walking to freedom.

"'Sure I did,'" Mandela said, per Clinton. "'I felt anger and hatred and fear. And I realized if I kept hating them, once I got in that car and got through the gate I would still be in prison. So I let it go because I wanted to be free.'"

Continued Clinton: "Every living soul on the planet has some often highly justified anger. Everybody… If you know anybody who was a P.O.W. for any length of time, you will see, you go along for months or maybe even years and then something will happen and it will trigger all those bad dreams, and it will come back, it may not last 30 seconds…"

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/07/bill-clinton-in.html

Will the media whores try to turn this in to Bill dissing McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
27inCali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was a bit disappointed with Bill during the primaries
But I'm in love with him right now, giving McCain the poison kiss. Using a compassionate overall statement to subtly slip in the semi-subliminable suggestion, "you know folks, those POWs went through some crazy shit, it's not their fault if they occasionally flip the fuck out and do some batshit crazy Vietnam flash-back shit and choke some dude half to death every once in a while."

I love you Bill, comin in after that all that nasty, bitter primary battling and just sucka punching McGrumpy right it the nuts like, Bam! no mercy.

Billy Boy plays for blood, mutha fucka!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is Bill Clinton the new "in" this week?
Edited on Mon Jul-07-08 04:53 AM by cornermouse
Someone has given a green light and we can all go back to liking him now? :sarcasm:

Those of us who always liked him are relieved to hear that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think it would be good if the press wrote about him and laid off Obama, since
Clinton isn't running for anything and so they can not hurt him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Bill's the same as he ever was
(Pretty much)
But the season has changed and now he does not have to be trashed so vehemently. And as Hillary gets out there making a difference for victory it will be pronounced that she is OK, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Beautiful words about Mandela. I detect nothing about McCain.
Edited on Mon Jul-07-08 05:08 AM by McCamy Taylor
The "POW" reference seemed to be to explain why Mandela would sometimes get angry---i.e. he sometimes had PTSD attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Really?
But that doesn't matter. As long as others did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Really?
It seems obvious to me. We've been hearing about McCain's explosive temper. Unlike Mandela, McCain, apparently has not let go of his anger at his captors. It is dangerous for a president to have this kind of unpredictable, uncontrollable anger that can be set off unexpectantly.

Kipling said "to keep your head while all others are losing theirs". That's what we need from a president. Someone who can keep their cool in ANY situation.

(FYI...notice how I complimented Obama without even mentioning his name. Bill Clinton ripped McCain, without mentioning his name.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. The two comments - Mandela's and Clinton's are intersting
Edited on Mon Jul-07-08 08:55 AM by karynnj
To me, what Mandela is saying is that keeping the anger would keep you from being free. He's speaking of letting it go.

Last spring, I was lucky to hear Sister Helen Prejean speak. She was the real life nun, whose story was told in "Dead Man Walking". In that speech, she spoke of how one person, who led her to take on her quest against the death penalty was the father of one of the youths who were murdered. He moved beyond hatred because he realized that he didn't want to feel the hate and anger all the time and have it define him. (take this recollection with a grain of salt - it is from memory only)

Mandela's comment sounds like this as well. If Clinton did not say, POW, I would think that he could be giving advice to himself. He has had many public displays of seemingly uncontrollable anger. Mandela clearly lived the life of one following the sentiment that Clinton quoted - and South Africa is the better for it (even with all their problems). There are American politicians, who can be credited with putting their anger at transgressions aside and working for what they believe in - Gore and Kerry come to mind.

Throwing in POW when McCain is one - is weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Speaking Of Anger, Hatred, And Fear...
Did Clinton use the opportunity of his speech to finally endorse Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Speaking of anger, hatred and fear,
when are you going to let go of yours?

The event was not a political appearance for the purpose of "endorsing" anyone. President Clinton has had a phone conversation with Senator Obama, and will, I'm sure, do what the Senator needs him to do at the proper time and place.

Give it a break! And as so many are so fond of saying, "Get over it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm Sorry - You're Right
I'm sure it's typical for a former Democratic president to withhold an endorsement from the Party's nominee for over a month. Clinton's probably doing it to help Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Hey Manny,
Edited on Mon Jul-07-08 08:57 AM by karynnj
You know it's the Obama people holding the endorsement until the proper moment.

I think linking Mandela's statement to his POW quote is weird. If intended to hurt McCain, it backfires as it links McCain to Mandela.

Not to mention, there are people who NEVER were POWs, that have bouts of intense anger - even on TV when they wag their finger at reporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I Hope You're Right About The Endorsement
Winning in November is critical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. OOps - I was saying that sarcasticly
Though in 2004, I don't think there was a big overt endorsement of Kerry. the only thing I remember is that there was a big democratic event where Clinton praised all the 2004 people, including Kerry, as well as spoke of Kerry as the nominee. He also gave his speech at the convention.

This really shows what a mess is created when a First Spouse runs. Opponents need to highlight the low points because the spouse will (justifiably) use the high points. How else do you contest it. (It likely would have been even messier if Al Gore or John Kerry had run against them. ) Now, it makes the endorsement more important - especially when matches to the attacks.

You are right that it has to be done - It actually has to be done well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. President Clinton
is not a political neophyte, and has stated he will do as the nominee wishes him to do. It really, really is time for you to get over your hatred of anything spelled Clinton, and move forward with the NEW head of the Democratic Party, the presidential nominee.

This was not a "typical" primary season, and you know it as well as I. The "typical" former Democratic president did not have a spouse running for the nomination and was not vilified by supporters of the eventual nomination as was this former Democratic president.

OF COURSE there are issues to work out, and OF COURSE the Obama campaign is now calling the shots! He is the nominee.....haven't you noticed?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. this is better than an endorsement
and as long as it appears that their relationhsip is 'frosty' his subliminal attacks on McCain are not seen as partisan.


Very Clever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think that "The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg" is reaching a bit by taking this as a shot at McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. i don't know what to think of big C's use of the term pow. if nothing else, it is interesting.
Edited on Mon Jul-07-08 09:21 AM by nc4bo
been hanging out at DU too long because i automatically associate the the "word" POW w/mcsame :S

Perhaps some other not-so politically inclined individuals would think the same way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. I would be willing to bet that if given a task to assign the first name that
comes to mind when you say, POW would show an extremely high percent McCain - and not just on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. Didn't McCain work to help VietNam with Kerry
years ago?

I thought the two of them did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Yes, though you wouldn't know that from Clinton's book, released in July 2004
He credits only McCain. Kerry was just the chair of the committee (with Bob Smith, the ultra conservative Republican as Ranking Member)
McCain's own book gives Kerry the lion's share of the credit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bill for VP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Not constitutional, but I would settle for Hillary.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC