Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here, I think, are the proper tone and frame for the McNasty POW story:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 11:09 AM
Original message
Here, I think, are the proper tone and frame for the McNasty POW story:

McCain supported Bush's veto of the anti-torture bill, thereby endorsing the use of torture even though he knows from his own tragic personal experience that torture can be used to extract false confessions, such as when the North Vietnamese tortured him into signing a statement that he was a war criminal.

This approach does two things simultaneously--it brings the discourse into current relevance, and it puts his "heroism" into context.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's certainly lose-lose for McCain - I like it
He has to choose between:
1) He's really a war criminal
2) Torture doesn't work

Of course, he'll choose either:
3) 9/11 changed everything
4) Shut up, you c**t!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForeignSpectator Donating Member (970 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. or 5)
"Shut up, you c**t, 9/11 changed everything!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's what I think too
Of all his flip flops, the torture one is the worst. How could you ever support the use of torture, having been through it yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. With you, Jackpine.. I have not heard enough mention of his refusal
to vote against B*sh's veto on that vote. That is the BIGGEST and most egregious of his many flip-flops.

It proves to me that he will say or do anything to get this office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree....
I didn't understand McCain's position on this bill then, and I don't understand it now. My opinion of him was never all that great, but I honestly expected more from him on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. That is good. Thank you. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I like it - sort of like "Do you still beat your wife?" - Negative precedent - saying the same thing
repeatedly.

Copied from a blogger elsewhere re "Perception is Reality"
My introduction to the phrase “perception is reality” was in politics. I thought it referred to politicians and their supporters’ ability to tell half-truths and lies supporting their respective positions.

I heard this more during the Clinton years than at any other time. And why not? Clinton got away with more bullshit than any other adolescent, priapic, President in American history. **So, when the Clintonistas falsely recall that 1992 was the worst economy in 50 years people still believe it simply because Clintonistas got away with saying so for ten years.** The worst economy in 50 years actually occurred during Carter’s administration. Remember Carter's double-digit inflation and double-digit unemployment?

This has nothing to do with Clintonistas proving their premise thereby assuming any burden of proof, or proving their premise demonstrably, logically, or statistically accurate. **It simply has to do with sitting on what lawyers call the negative precedent. Clintonistas simply gain legitimacy by getting away with saying the same thing repeatedly. The burden of proof then slyly shifts to their opponents to prove their premise(s) false.**

Hence, people said when referring to politics throughout the 1990’s, that perception is reality. **If people perceive something true in politics then that is all that matters. It actually refers to the removal of any burden of proof by politicians postulating their opinions, or ideas.** Hopefully, people will be more probing in the future. Good luck.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. By the Bushco definition of torture
McCain's experience may not qualify.

In the Justice Department's view -- contained in a 50-page document signed by Assistant Attorney General Jay S. Bybee and obtained by The Washington Post -- inflicting moderate or fleeting pain does not necessarily constitute torture. Torture, the memo says, "must be equivalent in intensity to the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It doesn't matter. Grant them the torture.
Then turn it on them. There is a lot of controversy over what happened in North Vietnam. Here, for example:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/020708_never_tortured.htm

Top Cop Says McCain Was Never Tortured
Former Vietnam vet with top secret clearance - Republican frontrunner is "a lying skunk"

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, February 7th, 2008


A former Vietnam veteran with top secret clearance says he has personally spoken to numerous POW's who dispute John McCain's claim that he refused to provide information after he was captured and tortured in Hanoi, saying that in fact McCain's code-name was "Songbird" because of his willingness to tell all to avoid torture.

Jack McLamb served nine years in secret operations in Cambodia and other nations before going on to become one of the most highly decorated police officer's in Phoenix history, winning police officer of the year twice before taking a role as a hostage negotiator for the FBI.

"I know a lot of Vietnam veterans and a few POW's and all the POW's that I've talked to over the years say that John McCain is a lying skunk," McLamb told the Alex Jones Show.


And you can find lots more of that kind of stuff if you poke around the web. But let's not go there. You'll only provoke screaming denial and talking-head hissy fits.

I think it's more devastating and relevant to the present to concede the torture and then slam him for not having learned from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. In the forth coming Presidential debates, will he be asked "why" he now supports torture?
Edited on Mon Jul-07-08 12:30 PM by gordianot
I strongly doubt that media pukes will give this too much attention given their short term memory. One can hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC