Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mother Jones: McCain Campaign Screening Questioners?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 10:23 AM
Original message
Mother Jones: McCain Campaign Screening Questioners?
http://www.motherjones.com/washington_dispatch/2008/07/john-mccain-screening-conference-call-questions.html

By David Corn

July 8, 2008

John McCain has cultivated the rep of a politician unafraid of questions. When he campaigned for president in 2000, he often hung out with reporters on his bus and fielded questions until the journalists were out of queries. In the 2008 campaign, as he did eight years earlier, McCain has held town hall meetings during which he called on attendees who were obviously not McCain supporters. (It was during one such exchange that McCain said it would be "fine" by him if U.S. troops remained in Iraq for "a hundred years.") So why then does it seem that the McCain campaign has been screening questioners during the conference calls featuring campaign aides and top-level surrogates it mounts for reporters?

In the 2008 campaign, conference calls with reporters have become an essential part of candidates' media operations. During the most heated days of the Barack Obama-Hillary Clinton contest, both campaigns arranged at least one conference call a day (sometimes there were more). "Our calls were open to all press -- national, local, and online," says Howard Wolfson, who was communications director for the Clinton campaign. "Although from time to time we tried to give priority to local press in whatever state we happened to have a primary, we never screened reporters or questions." And Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the Obama campaign, says, "We don't screen our calls."

For these calls, reporters dialed a toll-free number and were quickly connected to the call in a listen-only mode. After the campaign spinners and surrogates finished their opening remarks, the journalists fired questions at them. (To ask a question, reporters merely had to punch *1 on the keypad and get in line.) Hillary Clinton's aides often remained on the line for an hour or longer to answer a great many questions covering assorted topics. Obama's advisers were stingier with their time; consequently, many reporters did not get a chance to ask anything. But both campaigns took questions on a first-come basis, without the campaign aides knowing which reporter was on the other end when his or her line was opened. For the aides, it was sort of like holding a press conference in a totally dark room. When the operator said, "next question," they had no clue who would be in the interrogator's seat.

This is not how the McCain campaign does it. When a reporter calls in for a conference call, he or she is asked by an operator to provide his or her name and media outlet. Then when it comes time for questions, there is a long pause--long enough for someone in the campaign to select whom should be called on. This has caused several journalists who have participated in these calls to wonder: is the McCain campaign screening reporters, and, if so, on what basis? A reporter for a progressive media outlet says that he has tried at least half a dozen times to ask a question on a McCain conference call and has had never been selected.

The same has happened to me. No matter how quickly I press *1, I'm never afforded the opportunity to pose a question. During a June 27 McCain campaign call with former Republican Massachusetts Governor Jane Swift (who was deriding Obama for holding a unity rally with Hillary Clinton at Unity, New Hampshire), I raised my hand, electronically. Two reporters were called on--one from AOL News, the other from the Tampa Tribune--and then the McCain aide hosting the call said, "Seems we are out of questions," and ended the call. My hand was still up.

-snip-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kicking. Though so far apparently I'm the only one interested in this critique of McCain.
:kick:

Just as I watched a topic I'd posted about a very positive article on Michelle Obama sink like a rock yesterday, till I kicked it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course he is. Can't have any loose cannon reporters asking
cold call asteroids which would put the mighty maverick on his heels.

he's a sham, always was.

....and the propping continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why does this surprise any of us? McSame is Dumbya. Period.
He's using the same tactics that Dumbya used per KKKarl Rove. Meanwhile, the M$M is helping him along quite nicely. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Color me surprised
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'll kick it
I care.

Of course the McSame people are playing favorites with the media. Spontanity and honesty are their mortal enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NatBurner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. shocking.
as in, i'm shocked that even SCREENED reporters are allowed to question The Great McSantini
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC