lottie244
(903 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-21-04 12:21 PM
Original message |
If the Swiftees saw Kerry's boat leave a man in the water why didn they |
|
pick him up since there was no enemy fire? (according to their own story) Are they cowards of the highest order to see a man in the water and not try to rescue him?
|
bigmonkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-21-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Have they admitted that they saw him fall in the water? |
|
Lord, I hope so. If so, a simple statement by an interviewer like "You saw him fall in the water, there was no enemy fire, and you didn't go back to get him? Well, I think I know cowardice when I see it." might be quite effective.
|
Paradise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-21-04 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Paradise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-21-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
3. great thinking! :) n/t |
olddem43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-21-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I thought of that too and could only think that it just proves |
|
they're all liars. After all, they were only a short distance away and Kerry supposedly had fled (apparently out of boredom, since nothing was happening). Their story changes continually - every time one lie is disproved they change the line. One thing most people know, especially detectives and prosecutors: the truth never changes.
|
KayLaw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-21-04 01:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I didn't know they said that. I haven't been following the story because of my obsession with Hurricane Charley.
These guys should be kicked out of the country!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |