Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Because Jesse Jackson is seen as left-fringe, his comments benefit Obama's 'move to the center.'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:29 PM
Original message
Because Jesse Jackson is seen as left-fringe, his comments benefit Obama's 'move to the center.'
Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Since when has Jesse Jackson ever been left-fringe?
I'm left fringe, he's a moderate, at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seen that way by the middle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Only because he barely leans to the left...
and I do mean BARELY. Our whole political discourse in this country is fucked up, things become completely meaningless, hell, anything to the left of Bush is pretty much considered "fringe left wing" by the Mainstream Media and the people who believe them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Best he ever did was about 20% of primary vote in '88.
Since more progressive DEMS are likely to vote in the primary, 20% of a distinct minority qualifies as 'fringe', seems to me.

No he's not Lybdon Larouche and yes, he has a constituency; but he's not mainstream and the OP is probably correct that his remarks could benefit Obama.

For the record, I voted for Jackson in the '88 NY primary and do not regret my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. People don't vote in primaries for the "most progressive" candidate...
They vote for the one they think, or rather, what other people say, is the most electable candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They do one or the other and sometimes ( rarely) both.
Are you saying that lots of people aligned philosophically with JJ voted for Dukakis instead?

Perhaps. Certainly some did. But JJ's position on Israel-Palestine ( as well as his disparaging remarks about Jews and NYC) was a big issue in the primary here. Needless to say, much of the Dukakis and Gore vote was an anti-Jackson vote. These people were NOT secretly aligned with Jackson and voting for the pragmatist, Dukakis.

If memory serves , he finished third of three but it was close between JJ and the youthful Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theliberalking Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I\'d say it\'s a combination of progressivism and electability
When choosing among progressives Kucinich (or Dodd) and Obama, for example, the one who is seen as more electable, Obama in this case, would be favored, as we saw during the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Jackson receive more votes than Ross Perot. That was something.
And Jackson did very well in Appalachia and among mid-west farmers. Also, Jackson was the originator of the "hope" message. How soon we forget..."Keep hope alive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. MSM Will Spin It As Jackson Being Jealous Of Obama...
... and this spin might actually be true, since publicly Jackson supports Obama, but privately he said what he said, and got ripped on by his own son from blurting out that comment.

Remember, Bill Clinton put-down Obama by comparing Obama to Jesse Jackson, and I am sure that Jesse Jackson is pretty ticked off at both Clinton and Obama for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. But we old folks from the boots-on-the-ground movement of the '60s
know exactly what Jesse was talking about. No one had to tell me how to feel about those ads and subtle dissing of black and poor folks. Say what you will, but we know exactly what Jesse means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's BS - Malcolm X and Other Black Militants Thrived
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 01:30 AM by Median Democrat
Preaching a message of self-empowerment and personal responsibility to people of color. Preaching self-improvement is not dissing people of color. Its believing in them. Yes, government can help, but more often government serves to protect the status quo. Government can assist in providing opportunities, but ultimately it is up to each individual. As a person of color, I totally agree with Obama's speech. His experience is a wonderful and inspirational example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC