Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is your LEAST favorite for VP?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:44 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who is your LEAST favorite for VP?
Edited on Fri Jul-11-08 05:57 PM by Laura PackYourBags
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I could live with all of those, so I won't say hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yep, just changed it to least fav. I personally can't stand Bayh -
after I heard him talk about how legit the 04 election was. Also, he
his haircut has always given me the creeps for some reason

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. That is one whacked out hair do...The guy's a milquetoast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. I know - he just strikes me as an intellectually lazy, "pretty" boy
(not to me), that got where he is because of his dad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
81. It looks like John Edwards' haircut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #81
85. It looks like a failed attempt at a John Edwards haircut. Edwards always looks slammin! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #85
108. Not really - despite the $200 price tag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #81
107. yes, but Bayh's looks like a wig just plopped on his head Edwards'
looks like it's actually growing out of his head. what's funny is for Edwards, to
me, it looks just too perfect. What men don't know is that women probably like
it a little more messy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton because she caused too much ugly during the primary
and some of her supporters have gone off the deep end and are trying to cause all kinds of trouble still
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree - but I somehow got beyond it - only because if she
could win Ohio for him - and he has said he is weak on
keeping up with all the detail and she stikes me as
probably really good at that -- her info retention
is amazing.

But, she hurt him by staying in - and I still hate
her for that. But, it might be better to have
her on his side than working passive aggressively
behind the scenes. I want him to win - and whatever
it takes.

Still got the Bill issue though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. she screwed up the money situation by not stopping
I max'd out my credit card donating to him and I'm just a student, had to because she wouldn't stop. Now she expects her huge debt to be paid off by people that are struggling and are pissed off at her. Good thing he's doing good and doesn't need her because everybody I know is still pissed at her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. That's a great point I hadn't thought about. All that money we
gave that could have been used against McPain. Who knows, maybe that
was part of her plan? No one could figure out why she stayed in
despite the mathematical impossibility of her winning. Maybe she
thought - hell if I can't get it - I'll make him spend all his
money so it will dry up and McCain will beat him. Or, maybe I
am just crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nunn or Hagel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:57 PM
Original message
Agree on both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. thanks - just took Richardson and Gore off - against all good
polling practices, I know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. What? I just voted for Richardson. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. sorry. that's my bad. I wanted to add nunn and hagel and no
one had picked Richardson or Gore so I replaced them.

Duly noted - 1 vote for Richardson !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman74 Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Agreed. And I went with Nunn. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrs_p Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
68. me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
62. YUP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
84. Totally agree. I voted Hagel, but Nunn is a close second and Bayh would come just after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #84
105. Could Bayh be more boring a choice? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. I have to say Richardson.
I know the man has credentials but to listen to him I just think he can't get his words out. Obama is such a great speaker that I don't want Richardson on the same stage with Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. NNNoooo
Just kidding. Yep, he's not the smoothest, you are right. But there's a certain
chemistry between them that I like. He's got gravitas that grounds Obama. And
Bill could teach O so much about the ways of international government and
diplomacy since he's probably got all the connections already. Plus he's
a huge proponent of alternative energy - a big goal for Obama.

I was actually quite surprised when I looked up all he had done in his career
and in NM. He's no slouch. He also broke the record for shaking the most
hands during a campaign event.

Did I convince you yet? haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Definitely Richardson
I want someone solid at VP. Richardson is all over the place, from his Klingon facial hair to the defensive posture he always finds himself in debates, explaining and apologizing for everything.

I can't see Richardson succeeding Obama as president in 8 years. There would be relentless questions like the ones applied to Gore, "Does he have what it takes?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Biden for his cozy bank and credit card lender ties...
Edited on Fri Jul-11-08 06:01 PM by tokenlib
...actually I would have went with Bayh--but too many people here at DU give Biden a pass on this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. I still harbor resentment towards Biden from the Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas hearings
According to Anita Hill's lawyer, Biden lied his ass off in the hearings. Angela Wright who was also subpoenaed was never called to testify. Her testimony would have corroborated Anita Hill's statement as she experienced similar acts of sexual harrassment by Thomas. Biden said that he didn't call Angela Wright to testify because she didn't want to appear. But that claim has been totally repudiated by the facts. Biden's staffers asked Angela Wright to ask for withdrawl of the subpoena.

And Biden stated that he didn't call Anita Hill back to rebut the claims she was lying because her counsel refused. Anita Hill's counsel has accused Biden of lying and that it was Biden himself who didn't want her to testify a second time and clear the record.

And there was the question of the lie detector test that Anita Hill passed and that Biden claimed was irrelevant. You can bet that if Anita Hill had failed that lie detector test, the Republicans like Orrin Hatch would have made frequent references to it and to its relevancy.

I think Biden is probably the best politician and most powerful public speaker among the list of VP candidates. He might even make a very good VP candidate. But I wouldn't want Biden to have a chance to become President in 8 years because I just don't trust him when the chips are down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. His wife died after that, right? He seems, to me anyway, so
much more likeable now. He used to be so much more of a blowhard - very self absorbed. He
seems to have mellowed a lot.

He never struck me as dishonest though - thanks for informing me !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. It should be noted that Biden voted AGAINST Thomas.
I know a lot of people have the above memory and feelings about the hearings. I've read both 'sides' but have been unable to locate any film of it to be able to come to my own conclusion. We all interpret things differently.

It's my firm belief that Biden is one of the most honest and forthcoming Senators.

For what it's worth. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. Senator Paul Simon was critical of Biden's handling of those hearings
I remember those hearings and followed them on television. I was personally acquainted with one of Anita Hill's corroborating witnesses, Judge Susan Hoerchner. I appeared quite a few times before Judge Hoerchner as an attorney and spoke to her about her testimony in her chambers after the hearings were completed. A Yale grad, Judge Hoerchner always struck me as being a very honest Judge, beyond reproach.

Senator Simon who was a member of the committee that Biden chaired stated that if they had been made aware of the three other witnesses who had similar stories about Thomas, that he would have never been confirmed. Biden I think was playing politics and was very afraid of Republican accusations that he was being racist. I think he capitulated to the Republicans and then lied about why the other corroborating witnesses were not called and why Anita Hill was never called back to testify and rebut the claims that she was lying. That's what bothered me about Biden, the fact that he was less than honest about the decisions he made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #43
61. He also kept a witness from testifying who worked with Hill and wanted to testify that she used to
brag about dating Thomas...which would have done damage to her credibility.

It helps immensely to know ALL the facts, not just one side of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #61
90. That in itself is troubling about the man
All the evidence should have come in before the committee and all relevant testimony should have been heard; no political game-playing, no beltway back door deals, no lying after the fact about the decisions that he made and why. Anita Hill's credibility was extremely strong and the three corroborating witnesses, if called, would have made Thomas' nomination to the Supreme Court DOA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. Biden's first wife died just after his first election in 1972
long before he was head of Judiciary Committee, 1987-1994.

He married his wife Jill in 1977.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. thanks. I heard a story about it -- that he was totally despondent
and his kids inspired him to come back to the real world and not give up living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Some elder Senators convinced him to give it a try at least and he began his famous commute
as the Washington insider who's never lived there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #49
65. Looks like he won the poll ! Of course I didn't have Gore or
Richardson on here. So, there you go, our top three:

Gore
Richardson
Biden

Wish we could have them all !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
42. Yawn.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Clinton--just today they're pimping stories about how much the press
misses her "drama". Good Christ--she'd suck all the oxygen out the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
76. sorry kids, you had your turn with the election
Grumbled the voter whose top choices were ignored ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Rendell is my pick. But he wasn't on the list so I went Clinton.
I can't forgive the dirty politics she was playing during the primaries, her actions were underhanded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hillary. Because She Voted Against the Wiretapping FISA Bill
:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. LOL
Edited on Fri Jul-11-08 06:10 PM by vaberella
Stop that was way too funny.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Stuff came out my nose. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
63. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. Sam Nunn
I don't know why this name is being floated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I guess GA and his foreign policy experience? - but although
many of us think he needs to sure up his foreign policy - I think he won't do that. Mainly
because he said he doesn't think that is where he is weak. He didn't say where he was weak
but I personally think he will go with someone he likes and someone who is a good administrator -
since he said he's not good with keeping up with detail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. How anyone could vote for Hagel (NOT pro-choice) is beyond me
It's insane. Who are we? You'd vote against someone like Clinton, reliably pro-choice, for a novelty pick like Hagel?

Oh, and I voted before I read that people here "hate" Hillary. Let go of it. She had every right to run and to stay in. How I wished she'd won, but really, I thought we weren't supposed to bash anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Funny, it turns out that Hagel was on Hillary's VP short list. Ironic, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. What list was that?
I've never heard that, and I just (admittedy briefly) googled it, but I did not find any list of Hillary's with Hagel listed as a potential VP. I also don't think that she would put an anti-abortion person on a ticket.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Ruth Marcus, WaPo reporter, said that Hillary had been seriously considering
Edited on Fri Jul-11-08 07:21 PM by wienerdoggie
putting Hagel on her ticket. Just today. Teehee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. So in other words, it's hearsay
just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. But...interesting, isn't it? Apparently that was the buzz in Washington.
Hey, I like Hagel, it's a credit to Hillary for being that shrewd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. I don't like any candidate that takes away a woman's right to her own body
or who wants to. I don't like Hagel. And even if some Washington Post reporter (especially one whom the Daily Howler derides as being dishonest: http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh030508.shtml ) says Hillary might have picked Hagel, I don't personally see how she could have. Politics may make strange bedfellows, but Obama and Hillary would be well advised to steer clear of anyone awarded a 0% approval rating by NARAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #36
86. No Dem supported the Bush2 presidency more than Bill Clinton from 2001-2006.
Edited on Sat Jul-12-08 10:42 AM by blm
Going on a booktour in June/July 2004 and defending Bush on his terrorism and Iraq war decisions in nearly every interview Bill did was sheer genius....for Hillary2008.

Clintons and their loyal operatives didn't mind having an anti-choice President for 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hagel. He's a Republican, and not just by a little bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. I didn't even consider Hagel
Can't believe he's on the list. Just noticed that. No Republicans, that's the first criteria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. talk of Hagel had died down but now with the Iraq trip w/ Obama I'm sure it will be back. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
29. I had to go with Nunn
I don't like Hillary either, but if people actually were voting on their policies Nunn is far worse than Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
30. Wow, the Hillary haters are pathetic
Seriously? You'd rather have Sam Nunn or Chuck Hagel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #30
57. So everyone who voted "Clinton" hates her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #57
95. Well......probably so actually
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
That Is Quite Enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
35. I voted for Bayh, but I missed Nunn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
37. Tie between Hagel and Nunn
Closely followed by another tie between Hillary & Bayh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
38. For me, it's Sam Nunn. I'm just not a fan of Sam Nunn.
In fact I can hardly stand him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #38
104. Me either
But all the Hagel love around here edged him out in my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
40. How any progressive can vote for Bayh or Hillary as being worse than Nunn or Hagel
is way beyond me. It shows how completely fucked up a lot of people here are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. I think it's just the initial gut reaction. It's always about who you
like first, isn't it. Then the policies. There are a couple (only a couple) that I really like - but more
on the personal level and not the political level. I don't think anyone seriously thinks O would pick Hagel, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Let's hope not
but it's disturbing that people who think they are progressives hate good Democrats so much that they would prefer Sam Nunn, a notorious homophobe, and Chuck Hagel, who is against a woman's right to choose and is basically a rightwing nightmare except for his position on Iraq. Basically, these idiots are telling the women and gay people in their life to fuck off.

The first criteria for Veep is to remember that they may suddenly become President at a moment's notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #48
69. You know, I never thought about it - but you are right. Dems
vote more on feelings and personalities. Repukes overlook that and rally around whomever
can win and whomever fills their pocketbooks and whomever can start the most war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
44. Hagel and Nunn both n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
51. No Republicans,
That crosses Nunn and Clinton off the list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. But not Hagel?
:eyes:

At least Clinton is adamantly pro-choice and Nunn moderately so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
52. LOL, yeah I guess the primary wars are over
:eyes:

I can not believe that ANY Dem would be disliked more than a right wing but case like Chuck Hagel. FFS, I freaking loathe Sam Nunn, yet I'd take him every day and twice on Sundays before even considering Hagel. Some of you people are letting your Clinton Hatred reappear from the 90s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
53. would you mind at least spelling her name correctly?
bloody fucking hell. Is there no respect in this place?

You know who I'm referring to... :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #53
67. too late - sorry, I googled and this spelling came out on top
So sue me. By the way, being an environmentalist and spouting unnecessary
venom seem diametrically opposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Labors of Hercules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #67
83. As an environmentalist, I have nothing but venom...
toward what "humanity" has done to this planet. But you're right, I was a bit inebriated and going through a rough patch at the moment... I apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
55. Nunn. Might as well run McLurkin as his VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #55
102. lol Hagel beats Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
56. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-11-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
58. Twice as many people hate Bayh as do Hagel or Nunn? What are you people smoking?
For Christ's sake, Evan is a moderate but he's certainly more rational than Sam "Don't Ask Don't Tell" Nunn or Chuck Freaking Hagel, proud rightwing conservative.

You people are really strange. I don't like Evan Bayh, but have some perspective, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
59. Hagel
Sure, he has come out against the Iraq occupation in recent years, but are there any other issues he isn't a wingnut on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllHereTruth Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
60. NO
I wont vote in a poll where that have a vast majority more votes for Clinton than a Repub.

Thats just bullshit guys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #60
74. yep. visceral dislike for her has skewed this - should have stipulated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. why bother?
this poll says everything you need to know about DU....

and what people's opinions here are really worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #78
109. I agree with you!
From one staunch Obama supporter to a staunch Clinton supporter, I heartily agree - Hillary "winning" this poll rather than Hagel - the only R on it - is just ridiculous and really says something (not good) about DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
64. The REPUBLICAN. OMG, there's a REASON, people, HE has decided that's the Party for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
66. None of the above..
especially not HILLARY CLINTON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
70. Wow, 49% chose Clinton
Edited on Sat Jul-12-08 08:45 AM by Onlooker
No wonder Clinton supporters still aren't coming around. No wonder Obama only raised a small part of his goal for June. Until more Obama supporters get over their Hillary hate (actually preferring reactionaries like Hagel and Nunn to her!), he will not raise the kind of money he was anticipating. Between the Hillary hate and Obama's pandering to the right, it's no surprise that McCain with the RNC is keeping pace in the fundarising department. I can see not wanting Clinton for VP, but frankly she's a far better choice than many of the names in the OP's poll. I'm actually starting to wonder how much Obama support was simply anti-Hillary (or even anti-woman). Now that Hillary's out, the enthusiasm for Obama seems to be diminishing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. An interesting take. Not sure I agree but I see your reasoning here.
It kind of ties in with my theory that it's going to be a lot tougher than we think to get a black man elected president. I still think Obama will make it, but I don't think we should be surprised that there is still racism in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #70
99. HRC's base didn't have deep pockets, which is why she is in debt.
So appeasing her supporters won't do much in the way of fundraising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
72. Clinton is my least favorite.
She would cost votes, respect for Obama. I would vote for this ticket, but only because they are Democrats. It would cause me to give up any hope that the system will change.
I would vote for Obama no matter who he chooses for VP.
mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
73. Hagel
I don't want a Republican on the Democratic ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
75. Hagel's a republican. Check his voting record.
Why would anyone think that someone who votes with the republicanz on every issue should be Obama's vp?

If Hagel's on the Democratic ticket next fall, I won't vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
77. I don't know. I'm going to trust Obama on this one.
Anything beats Darth Cheney. He's set the bar below ground level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
79. wow clinton over republicans?
thats interesting.

i thought hillary ran an awful and dirty campaign but damn, id never wish a republican over her. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
80. Why do you have everyone else by last name except Wes Clark?
You have him listed as, "Wes."

I'm not complaining. It's just an observation. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #80
89. I have no idea why I did that - Maybe because for years and
years I have liked him and always wanted him to be president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
82. Some people may want to change party affiliation. There should be a consensus on Hagel.
He has nothing to do on a Democratic ticket. It is deeply shocking that 4 times more people say Clinton than Hagel, and this is not an endorsement for Clinton on the ticket, believe me, but a deep incredulity that progressive would want to see him on a Democratic ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
87. Mr. BAH... sorry, Bayh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
88. Bayh then Hagel/Nunn.
I could live with the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
91. Clinton gives the GOP too much to use against us.
First there's hers and Bill's baggage. But more importantly than that is the tone of Clinton's primary campaign - all her speeches against Obama will be used in GOP ads, showing that the two aren't really a team and that the Dems can't be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
92. Interesting results
according to this poll if Obama picked biden he would get the least negative response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #92
96. at least on a first round of elimination
there are a lot of DUers who hate Biden who might just hate someone else a little more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
93. No to Nunn, HELL NO to Hagel...any of the others are fine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
94. Not up to me but I think either Hagel or Nunn would be disastrous.
Hagel is a Republican FFS. Nunn seems on all accounts to be a worse DINO than Lieberman was. Apart from all other considerations, I think that having a RW vice president would increase the danger of some far-rightie taking a pot-shot at Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
97. Hillary - She burned her bridge with me big time
She ran up a huge debt by not dropping out of the race when it was clear she couldn't win. She damaged our nominee in the process. Now she wants help getting out of debt.

I wouldn't vote for her for dog catcher. Not even Vice Dog Catcher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brigid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
98. I went with Clinton.
Edited on Sat Jul-12-08 05:12 PM by Brigid
I like her, but the last thing Obama will need once he takes office is to have to deal with Bill Clinton's ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
100. Why didnt you put Richardson's name in the mix?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #100
106. because he is my favorite. Very skewed and unprofessional of
me, isn't it. Actually, I had it, but he had no votes, so I switched Hagel for Bill.
I also did the same with Gore for Nunn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
101. I wonder how many idiots chose Clinton/Bayh because they didn't know jack shit about Hagel or Nunn
:nuke: Get a fucking CLUE PEOPLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-12-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
103. Hagel. But Nunn's a very close second.
Jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
110. The Clintons are damaging Obama's campaign as we breath.
I've concluded that she is providing a calculatedly minimal amount of support designed to prevent blowback without actually helping Obama in any meaningful way.

And Bill Clinton is an utter embarrassment in his lack of support of the party and the nominee.

She could be addressing the spin-off wacky groups with an address or with articles, but isn't.

And she should eat the debt that accumulated during her sorry ass failed attempt to destroy our nominee.

She's still in it to win it, if not this year then in 2012.

I need some coffee.

And a donut.

:donut:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #110
111. Yep. But, do you think what she can damage is done? O was
way ahead in the polls but it has tightened to 0-4 pts. Maybe that's the worst
of her affect? and the only way now is up -- with the convention hoopla and
a vp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #111
113. I hope you're right, but in the same way that Nader made a little difference..
...and that little difference, it seems mighty sad (and unnecessary) that Obama has had to put up with this "weight" working against his momentum.

I get nervous thinking about it.

I just want one new fresh dynamic great president to take office before I die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
112. Why isn't Hagel number one?
Jeez, people would rather have a conservative Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #112
115. Incredible, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #112
116. Because some folks are using this poll
to bash Hillary yet one more time. It's a sport here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #116
118. True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #112
117. agreed. Hagel is by far the worst choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
114. The republican is in 2nd place a full 117 votes behind the 1st place democrat.
DU needs to change the "About DU" page. I suggest these changes:

"Democratic Underground (DU) was founded on Inauguration Day, January 20, 2001, to protest the illegitimate presidency of George W. Bush and to provide a resource for the exchange and dissemination of liberal and progressive ideas. Since then, DU has become one of the premier purple websites on the Internet, publishing original content six days a week, and hosting one of the Web's most active purple discussion boards.

We welcome purple Democrats of all stripes, along with other Democrats who will work with us to achieve our purple goals. While the vast majority of our visitors are Democrats, this web site is not affiliated with the Democratic Party, nor do we claim to speak for the party as a whole.

Democratic Underground would not be possible without the participation of purple -minded individuals from across the country and, indeed, from around the world. The content for the site is provided by people who feel that their purple views are not represented by the conservative "mainstream" media in the U.S. We accept article submissions from those on purple Democrats who wish to write, so that DU represents a variety of purple viewpoints. We have a particular appreciation for satire and humor."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/about.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
119. The fact that a Democrat can receive more than 3 times as many votes as a Repug ...
in an ostensibly DEMOCRATIC forum is indicative of how truly fucked I fear my party may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
120. I don't like Clinton that much, but to vote for her over Hagel or Nunn?
Some people are really fucked in the head for voting that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC