|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:44 PM Original message |
Poll question: Who is your LEAST favorite for VP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. I could live with all of those, so I won't say hate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. yep, just changed it to least fav. I personally can't stand Bayh - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChimpersMcSmirkers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 08:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
39. That is one whacked out hair do...The guy's a milquetoast. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 09:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. I know - he just strikes me as an intellectually lazy, "pretty" boy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
81. It looks like John Edwards' haircut. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #81 |
85. It looks like a failed attempt at a John Edwards haircut. Edwards always looks slammin! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 08:57 AM Response to Reply #85 |
108. Not really - despite the $200 price tag. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 08:55 AM Response to Reply #81 |
107. yes, but Bayh's looks like a wig just plopped on his head Edwards' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. Clinton because she caused too much ugly during the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I agree - but I somehow got beyond it - only because if she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lord Helmet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. she screwed up the money situation by not stopping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. That's a great point I hadn't thought about. All that money we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. Nunn or Hagel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:57 PM Original message |
Agree on both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. thanks - just took Richardson and Gore off - against all good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saturday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. What? I just voted for Richardson. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. sorry. that's my bad. I wanted to add nunn and hagel and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Herman74 (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. Agreed. And I went with Nunn. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrs_p (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 08:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
68. me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 01:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
62. YUP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
84. Totally agree. I voted Hagel, but Nunn is a close second and Bayh would come just after. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #84 |
105. Could Bayh be more boring a choice? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saturday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. I have to say Richardson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. NNNoooo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. Definitely Richardson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tokenlib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
8. Biden for his cozy bank and credit card lender ties... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. I still harbor resentment towards Biden from the Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. His wife died after that, right? He seems, to me anyway, so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. It should be noted that Biden voted AGAINST Thomas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
43. Senator Paul Simon was critical of Biden's handling of those hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 12:59 AM Response to Reply #43 |
61. He also kept a witness from testifying who worked with Hill and wanted to testify that she used to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #61 |
90. That in itself is troubling about the man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #27 |
41. Biden's first wife died just after his first election in 1972 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. thanks. I heard a story about it -- that he was totally despondent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 09:14 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Some elder Senators convinced him to give it a try at least and he began his famous commute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 07:50 AM Response to Reply #49 |
65. Looks like he won the poll ! Of course I didn't have Gore or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 08:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
42. Yawn..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. Clinton--just today they're pimping stories about how much the press |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 09:21 AM Response to Reply #10 |
76. sorry kids, you had your turn with the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
12. Rendell is my pick. But he wasn't on the list so I went Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
13. Hillary. Because She Voted Against the Wiretapping FISA Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 01:47 AM Response to Reply #13 |
63. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
17. Sam Nunn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I guess GA and his foreign policy experience? - but although |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
20. How anyone could vote for Hagel (NOT pro-choice) is beyond me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Funny, it turns out that Hagel was on Hillary's VP short list. Ironic, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:04 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. What list was that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Ruth Marcus, WaPo reporter, said that Hillary had been seriously considering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. So in other words, it's hearsay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. But...interesting, isn't it? Apparently that was the buzz in Washington. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. I don't like any candidate that takes away a woman's right to her own body |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:41 AM Response to Reply #36 |
86. No Dem supported the Bush2 presidency more than Bill Clinton from 2001-2006. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
23. Hagel. He's a Republican, and not just by a little bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. I didn't even consider Hagel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 09:16 PM Response to Reply #28 |
50. talk of Hagel had died down but now with the Iraq trip w/ Obama I'm sure it will be back. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
29. I had to go with Nunn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seen the light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
30. Wow, the Hillary haters are pathetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
57. So everyone who voted "Clinton" hates her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seen the light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #57 |
95. Well......probably so actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
That Is Quite Enough (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
35. I voted for Bayh, but I missed Nunn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
37. Tie between Hagel and Nunn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
38. For me, it's Sam Nunn. I'm just not a fan of Sam Nunn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 08:43 PM Response to Reply #38 |
104. Me either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
40. How any progressive can vote for Bayh or Hillary as being worse than Nunn or Hagel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 09:03 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. I think it's just the initial gut reaction. It's always about who you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 09:08 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Let's hope not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 08:33 AM Response to Reply #48 |
69. You know, I never thought about it - but you are right. Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
44. Hagel and Nunn both n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
51. No Republicans, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 09:55 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. But not Hagel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
52. LOL, yeah I guess the primary wars are over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Labors of Hercules (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
53. would you mind at least spelling her name correctly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 07:54 AM Response to Reply #53 |
67. too late - sorry, I googled and this spelling came out on top |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Labors of Hercules (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:33 AM Response to Reply #67 |
83. As an environmentalist, I have nothing but venom... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
55. Nunn. Might as well run McLurkin as his VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #55 |
102. lol Hagel beats Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
56. Deleted sub-thread |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-11-08 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
58. Twice as many people hate Bayh as do Hagel or Nunn? What are you people smoking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
last_texas_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
59. Hagel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllHereTruth (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
60. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 09:08 AM Response to Reply #60 |
74. yep. visceral dislike for her has skewed this - should have stipulated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:06 AM Response to Reply #74 |
78. why bother? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 08:59 AM Response to Reply #78 |
109. I agree with you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 02:41 AM Response to Original message |
64. The REPUBLICAN. OMG, there's a REASON, people, HE has decided that's the Party for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
66. None of the above.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Onlooker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
70. Wow, 49% chose Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 08:57 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. An interesting take. Not sure I agree but I see your reasoning here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 05:14 PM Response to Reply #70 |
99. HRC's base didn't have deep pockets, which is why she is in debt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
72. Clinton is my least favorite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
73. Hagel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogmarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
75. Hagel's a republican. Check his voting record. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
77. I don't know. I'm going to trust Obama on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
79. wow clinton over republicans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
80. Why do you have everyone else by last name except Wes Clark? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #80 |
89. I have no idea why I did that - Maybe because for years and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
82. Some people may want to change party affiliation. There should be a consensus on Hagel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
87. Mr. BAH... sorry, Bayh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
88. Bayh then Hagel/Nunn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
91. Clinton gives the GOP too much to use against us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
92. Interesting results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #92 |
96. at least on a first round of elimination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
93. No to Nunn, HELL NO to Hagel...any of the others are fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
94. Not up to me but I think either Hagel or Nunn would be disastrous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sampsonblk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
97. Hillary - She burned her bridge with me big time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brigid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
98. I went with Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
100. Why didnt you put Richardson's name in the mix? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 08:53 AM Response to Reply #100 |
106. because he is my favorite. Very skewed and unprofessional of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Runcible Spoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
101. I wonder how many idiots chose Clinton/Bayh because they didn't know jack shit about Hagel or Nunn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-12-08 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
103. Hagel. But Nunn's a very close second. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
110. The Clintons are damaging Obama's campaign as we breath. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 09:59 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. Yep. But, do you think what she can damage is done? O was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #111 |
113. I hope you're right, but in the same way that Nader made a little difference.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
112. Why isn't Hagel number one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #112 |
115. Incredible, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shayes51 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #112 |
116. Because some folks are using this poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 11:34 AM Response to Reply #116 |
118. True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #112 |
117. agreed. Hagel is by far the worst choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
114. The republican is in 2nd place a full 117 votes behind the 1st place democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
119. The fact that a Democrat can receive more than 3 times as many votes as a Repug ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-13-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
120. I don't like Clinton that much, but to vote for her over Hagel or Nunn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC