Phone numbers and email addresses to the New Yorker.

[NattPang]

David Carey -- New Yorker
Title: Publisher
Department: Headquarters
E-mail: [e-mail] ---> Letters to the Editor
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Jacob Lewis -- New Yorker
Title: Managing Editor
Department: Headquarters
E-mail: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Address: 4 Times Sq, New York, NY 10036

David Remnick -- New Yorker
Title: Editor
Department: Headquarters
E-mail: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]


New Yorker -- Letters to the Editor
Website: newyorker.com
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

[MannyGoldstein]

1. All Satire Should Be Made Illegal n/t

[thewiseguy]

2. Your sarcasm fails

[NattPang]

3. You can like it.

if you wish.

I don't.

Do you mind?

[Ewellian]

4. I like satire

but no one else is smart enough to understand it.

:sarcasm:

(edited to add sarcasm tag)

[NattPang]

5. The people going to catch their trains, or subway, and will see this cover

at the newsstand, don't read the New Yorker.
They just see the cover.
That's a problem
that the New Yorker
Created.

[Ewellian]

6. third person effect...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_person_effect

I don't see it as a problem. I see it as an opportunity for the Obama campaign to have an open discussion of the ridiculous rumors circulating.

[NattPang]

7. With the media that we have,

it will never happen in the way that it should.
But you know that.

[BklynChick]

8. Most NYers are not stupid enough to fall for that crap, but ultimately I don't like it.

[NattPang]

9. The New Yorker is not only sold in New York.

[BklynChick]

12. I know, my post was in relation to the subway comment. Thought you were referring to the NYC subway.

[thewiseguy]

11. NYers? Emm just like how NewYork times is only read by NYers?

[KittyWampus]

18. pretty much, it is. And the exceptions are fairly well informed.

[KittyWampus]

16. the overwhelming majority of people in NY are fucking liberals, the rest won't even notice it. They

focus on the singing or sports celebs.

[AZBlue]

14. Apparently someone's not smart enough to understand the effect of a cover on a newsstand

seen by thousands who won't read the accompanying article or even know that The New Yorker uses satire on its covers.

[KittyWampus]

17. apparently YOU aren't smart enough to understand who will even notice the NY'er

on a newstand. Your hysteria if fucking ridiculous.

[jefferson_dem]

21. Don't you know?!

Anyone exposed to this cover, for even a fleeting second, will forever associate Barack with terrorist-fist jabbing, the Koran, and burning American flags. Geeesh.

...


:sarcasm:

[AZBlue]

22. Are you kidding? Do you ever see a newsstand? Apparently not.

I see many - and TNY is always front & center. And I live in a very red area of a very red state.

[Colobo]

19. I bet you like this one... it hurts Obama, so...

[usregimechange]

10. kick

[emilyg]

13. No thanks.

I like free speech.

[NattPang]

15. Except when the Reporter gets suspended for a week,

for saying Chelsea was pimped by her parents.
Then free speech becomes questionnable,
doesn't it?

[emilyg]

26. Yes. Children should never be insulted.

[woolldog]

28. Chelsea is 28 years old.

:rofl: hardly a "child."

[emilyg]

31. My daughter is 43

and she'll always be my child.

[woolldog]

33. haha

You sound like my mom! She always says the same thing. ;-)

[emilyg]

34. Moms are pretty much the same world over.

Hi "Mom".

[1Hippiechick]

37. Which is why O said "no" to anymore interviews w/his children - no need to expose unnecessarily, IMO

and I agree about Moms! My older son is 36 and my "baby" is 33, but they will ALWAYS be my children, no matter how old. Ask my 102 year old grandmother - it is touching to see her still react "like a mom" to her 80 year old daughter (mu aunt).

[Kurt_and_Hunter]

27. What a nasty article you are that attacking a Democrat is your idea of heroism

[Bluerthanblue]

30. if the justification is "free speech"- the article doesn't matter squat-

And neither does the argument that 'children' should not be attacked- If all speech is 'free'- that would mean what was said about Chelsea- and the "nappy headed ho's" and all sorts of really destructive crap.


It's always a question of "perspective"-


:shrug:

The CARTOON 'attacks' the Obamas- at FACE VALUE- it doesn't matter what their intent MAY have really been- (I'm not really sure after all this crap), what DOES matter is the actual damage it does.

I DON'T believe the reporter who said what he did about Chelsea intended to hurt her, but he did. And an apology was not out of line.

[jefferson_dem]

20. Bring out the torches and pitchforks...!

Let's get em, boys!!!!!11!!!1

[Ewellian]

24. Good one!

I was googling for a torches and pitchfork picture about an hour ago but didn't find one I liked.

[JeffR]

23. from The New York Review of Magazines:

"The New Yorker— The 940,000 readers of The New Yorker live mainly on the deep-blue coasts. Its strongest swing-state growth has come in places with little power in the Electoral College, like New Hampshire and New Mexico..."

Just sayin'.

[Bluerthanblue]

29. well, fuck us silly New Hampshireites then eh?

since we don't really have much 'sway' with the electoral college-

I wonder why they even to count our votes at all-???


(not directing this at you JeffR- but at the 'comment' you quoted)


peace~

[MonkeyFunk]

25. What's the number for the subscription office?

It's time to renew.

[1Hippiechick]

35. Then you should be able to find that information on the inside cover, shouldn't you? n/t

[ZombieHorde]

32. I disagree with many of the policies of GWB.

[1Hippiechick]

36. The artist himself (supposedly) has already addressed this topic. See DU link below

post #18
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=6499137&mesg_id=6499158

[Iris]

38. Thanks! I'm going to restart my subscription! You've saved me a lot of time.