|
Personally, I'm more comfortable with his mom than I am with his faith, but I still found it fascinating.
When he found what he was seeking, I wonder how much of it was the Christ story, and how much of it was a racial pull?
I understand feeling the need to belong to something, to a group of some kind. I'm an only child, and my mom always considered herself a gypsy, moving almost every year, gaining new friends, leaving old friends behind. I craved stability among people all the way through my 30s.
It wasn't until my 40s that I realized all that time spent being the "fringe" of any group, moving on before too long, left me permanently a "lone wolf."
I did the xtian church thing when I was 17. My mom, though, taught me to question. To be open, but to look for certain universal qualities in faith, in people. I found dishonesty, corruption, misogyny, narrow-mindedness, illogic, and bigotry in organized xtian faith. There were many wonderful people, but the message taught, and lived, was problematic.
It didn't fit with what I was driven to seek. So I wonder about Obama, and his calling. And, of course, others who feel called to xianity, as well. Is it the paternal nature of the faith? The deep-seated need for a father figure who will lead you, protect you, etc.? I had that need, as well; my mom divorced my dad when I was 6 months old. The only father figure I ever had was my riding teacher. I even married his stepson at one point, and he was my "father" in truth for more than a decade. I still miss him. Still, I grew up without a father, or brothers, to look out for me; I had to learn to look out for myself. The men my mother had relationships with taught me not to trust men. They were abusive. She eventually looked at what she was doing, who she seemed to be attracted to, and just stopped having relationships. After I was grown and gone.
I find myself curious. I didn't have a problem with the statements made by Wright that Obama distanced himself from. I understand, politically, why he felt the need to do so. I don't understand it, personally. Which is more valuable to him? His political career, or the relationships he's developed through the course of his life? I had a problem with Wright being willing to campaign for one candidate, and against another, from the pulpit. I think that's irresponsible and unethical.
This article discusses faith-based activism. It does so in Obama's typical style: give the big idea, withhold the details. That's smart. It's also not necessarily bad. Or good. That's the problem; without the details, we can't tell how Obama interprets things in action. Perhaps that is deliberate, when trying to win votes from groups with so many different perspectives. I'd like to know this: does faith-based activism mean that, in order to honor your faith, you take action to promote social and economic justice, equality, civil rights, etc.? Or does it mean that you must "win souls" to your faith? Or a combination of both?
From a non-xtian perspective, most of the skepticism for xtian charities, for "faith-based" anything, is because it comes with a price. When a faith-based charity feeds the poor, it is, in essence, "buying" the right to try to convert. I've yet to see organized faith-based ANYTHING that doesn't have proselytizing at the core of the action.
This article leaves me curious about where Obama's faith will lead him. President or not, I want to know what church he chooses next, what faith his girls grow into. Part of it is just the satisfaction that spiritual evolution brings; Obama's mother made it possible for him to evolve in ways that many of xtian faithful don't.
Lest I leave anyone with the impression that I am "anti-christian," I'll clarify: I am definitely anti-organized religion of all stripes. I'm not anti-any faith for individual seekers. I'm anti-"faith-based" anything that has connections to government. I'm against the use of tax dollars by any faith-based organization.
I'm not anti-faith or spirituality. As a matter of fact, I spent yesterday morning watching my almost 70yo mom, a confirmed Buddhist, singing enthusiastically, joyfully, on stage with the gospel choir she is a member of. An ecumenical choir, obviously, since she was allowed to join. She reminds me that, while I will never be called to xianity as a faith, I can respect and learn from the joy they find, and the positive things they do out of that joy.
|