Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House, Obama camp squabble over Iran meeting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 06:44 PM
Original message
White House, Obama camp squabble over Iran meeting
Good move, Senator Obama. OWN the idea of diplomacy!

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/white-house-obama-camp-squabble-over-iran-meeting-2008-07-16.html

White House, Obama camp squabble over Iran meeting
By Sam Youngman
Posted: 07/16/08 03:15 PM


The White House on Wednesday adamantly denied Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama’s (Ill.) claim that the U.S. is negotiating with Iran by sending a high-level diplomat to a meeting with an Iranian official this weekend.

By sending Undersecretary of State Bill Burns to Geneva to meet with the Tehran emissary, the White House has “shifted course” from refusing to negotiate with the country, the Illinois senator said in a statement.

snip//

Obama said this was a good first step toward pushing toward a diplomatic solution to halting Iran's nuclear program.

"Now that the United States is involved, it should stay involved with the full strength of our diplomacy," Obama said. "A united front with our friends and allies directly calling on the Iranians to stand down on their illicit nuclear program will maximize the international pressure we can bring to bear and will show the Iranian people that Iran's isolation is a function of its government's unwillingness to live up to its obligations. Iran should live up to its obligations now; by waiting, it will only face greater isolation."

Perino said sending Burns was a signal that the Bush administration is committed to a diplomatic solution, and she said high oil prices and last week's Iranian missile tests had nothing to do with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's decision to send Burns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
loveable liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Condi made a decision? that is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seems like a last moment decision, but who knows...
in the SFRC hearing on Iran last week, Burns was asked repeatedly by Hagel about this very same thing and avoided to answer http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/16/iran.usforeignpolicy A test of US flexibility toward Iran

Very interesting meeting, by the way, and Burns seemed to be a smart and respected (both Biden and Lugar were all over him in admiration, others as well I think) professional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama is running circles around these guys .....
Yesterday it was McCain and Afghanistan .... today Bush and Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
4.  Yeah, the white house wouldn't want to be seen
as using diplomacy..they'd rather lie, lie some more, and bomb it to smithereens and take over the oil leases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. they don't want to be seen as using Obama's ideas but that's exactly what they're doing
though not for the same reasons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. as with North Korea, this administration is discovering that it has to do what their opponent have
been saying for years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is this a reflection of how badly Bush knows he has fucked up?
Is this an attempt to leave a positive legacy, and do the right fucking thing for once?

Or the prelude to a regional conflagration kicked of by an American or Israeli military action against Iran?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC