Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

National Review Tries to 'Feminize' Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 09:57 AM
Original message
National Review Tries to 'Feminize' Obama
via AlterNet's PEEK:



National Review Tries to 'Feminize' Obama

Posted by Roy Edroso, Alicublog at 5:17 AM on July 20, 2008.

Right can't seem to get their narratives straight



Former TV critic lists top 10 reasons why "Real Men Vote For McCain" which, in addition to being one of the very few NR articles to support McCain without evident embarrassment, portrays the Democratic candidate as anathema to the butch: "Obama supports higher taxes for a government-run nanny state that will coddle all Americans like babies," "Obama gets support from Leonardo DiCaprio, Matt Damon, Oprah Winfrey, Tom Hanks, and every weenie in Hollywood," "Obama is married to a bitter, angry lawyer," etc.

In case some of the brethren have lost their decoder rings, Peter Kirsanow spells it out at The Corner: Obama "projects weakness," and not just "the vacillating, flip flopping weakness of your garden variety politician," but a "screaming, flashing, neon light on the forehead weakness." Not only is Obama a screamer, like all liberals; he's also a flasher. One wonders why Kirsanow didn't try to work "flaming" into the formulation. Maybe they do have editors at National Review after all.

Kirsanow also finds weakness in Obama's "attitude and demeanor." He doesn't really explain, though he does mention famous bachelor Adlai Stevenson, claim (without supporting examples) that "when Obama tries to talk tough it sounds either silly or plaintive," and make a jerking motion with his fist near his mouth while poking his cheek with his tongue.

"It may say something unflattering about human nature," says Kirsanow, "but everybody gets it." Indeed we do. The question is, what's the point publishing this in a wonky online magazine, when its intended audience barely knows how to read? Kirsanow would have had better luck reaching them by scrawling a seriously simplified version of his post on an outhouse door, printing it on a gimme cap, or painting it on Carl Edwards' Ford Fusion. (I would suggest they forward the top 10 to Larry The Cable Guy, but it's really not up to his standards.)


http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/92089/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are so obtuse that they can't realize how positive is when a man
is in touch with his sensitive, delicate, gentle, thoughtful side... if that's what they mean with "feminine". I'm one of those guys and I'm proud of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. But can McCain sink a basketball like Obama?
This article is ridiculous. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sexist, homophobic garbage by pigs, for pigs!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. And in related news, National Review tries to sell magazines.
Unsuccessfully. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. If the Right wants to smear Obama with cultural limitations it will have to
find a way to explain the skills he has at hoops.

Basketball also has cultural import and Obama is pretty darn good at it.

How about a one-on-one between Obama and whoever is instigating these rumors -- say in a high school gym in west Texas or in Seymour, Indiana?

I think that will settle this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam kane Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. This being the NR, such drivel was probably lifted from elsewhere, too. nt.
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. This guy was on the civil rights commission by recess appointment believe it or not
A real piece of work.

Senators Harry Reid and Edward M. Kennedy and AFL-CIO President John Sweeney "all expressed disappointment with Bush's recess appointment of Peter Kirsanow to the National Labor Relations Board, citing his record as a member" of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. "'He is an ardent foe of basic worker protections, including the minimum wage and basic worker protections, including the minimum wage and prevailing wage laws, and is a vehement opponent of affirmative action,' Kennedy said.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Peter_N._Kirsanow




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:15 AM
Original message
He's a bush toady. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillysuse Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Another Jeff Gannon look alike - and appointed by Bush
I wonder if Bush stroked his bald head when he appointed him.

Looks like he had a wide stance as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. Silly National Review
I wonder if any of them had ever met the founder of their magazine before he died? William Buckley was about as effete as a straight man can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SparkyMac Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Right is using all of it's character assassination now ...
.. what are they going to use in October ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. They leave out the operative word real stupid men vote for McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NattPang Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. McCain and his whining about Obama's trip and the coverage of such
is the one who sounds like he's crying to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. These folks are so desperate that it is becoming very funny...
to read and hear their comments. I wonder what's next in their attack bucket? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-20-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. Real men know about the viagra-birth control health insurance issue
whether they need viagra or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC