Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain Camp On Maliki: "One Inartful Statement"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:50 AM
Original message
McCain Camp On Maliki: "One Inartful Statement"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/21/mccain-camp-on-maliki-one_n_114017.html


McCain Camp On Maliki: One Inartful Statement



The McCain campaign argued on Monday, that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's endorsement of Barack Obama's troop withdrawal plan was "one inartful statement," adding that should Obama actually take seriously Maliki's words it would be the height of political irresponsibility.

"One inartful statement from Prime Minister Maliki certainly does not change Iraq government policy," said McCain senior foreign policy adviser Randy Scheunemann. "And certainly given the history of inartful statements from the Obama campaign, like Jerusalem remaining an undivided capital of Israel, or I'm going to campaign in 57 states, or Americans cling to guns and religion out of bitterness, etc... I certainly can't believe the Obama campaign will take a quote that has already been clarified out of context and try to hang their Iraq policy on it."

Citing news reports that Maliki had walked back his remarks, Scheunemann nevertheless seemed on the defensive. The Maliki interview with the German paper Der Speigel has been translated and reviewed by several different publications, all of which concluded that his endorsement of Obama's troop withdrawal plan was not, in fact, taken out of context but rather fairly explicit. Moreover, word spread Sunday night that Maliki only clarified his remark after White House urging. In addition, this was not the first time that the Iraqi prime minister had stated his preference for a date-driven reduction in U.S. troops. More than a week ago he argued that it had to be a prerequisite for a long-term deal between the two countries. Finally, as the McCain campaign's conference call commenced, word quickly spread that the Iraq's government spokesman, Ali al-Dabbagh, had insisted in a separate interview that Maliki still backed a plan in which U.S. combat forces would leave Iraq by 2010. Asked to respond to the weekend-saga -- as well as the inclusion of a time horizon for troop draw downs in negotiations between the U.S. and Iraq (a position that seems much closer to Obama's stance than McCain's) -- Scheunemann did his best to put lipstick on the pig.

"The Iraqi government made it clear there were apparently some translation problems in the quote, that that's not the position of the Prime Minister," he said. "That the prime minister believes and certainly the Iraqi government believes that withdrawal has to be based on conditions. I certainly think it would be rather interesting if the Obama campaign is going to rely on one statement form Prime Minister Maliki that has been clarified and made clear, is not authoritative in terms of his personal position or the position of the Iraqi government."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL - from the expert on inartful statements!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. You took the words out of my keyboard! :-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. In other words, "America doesn't have to listen to what Iraq wants"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Was it an inartful statement or an inconvenient truth? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Inartful" is really catching on
I'm going to start using it in my work and personal life...see if it flies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Inartful isn't a word. Webster's has no such definition.
I looked it up. Try googling it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
World Citizen Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. this is a good sign
and a pleasure watching fumble-tongue playing defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Naturally, political statements are where we get most of our art...

They're not even saying Maliki was wrong. They're complaining that he didn't speak the truth more artfully.

Even his "clarification" stated that a speedy withdrawal timetable would be "more realistic."

That would put McCain in the "less realistic" category.

The clarification was very artful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sorry, Republicans, the occupation is going to end, and there's not a
goddamn thing you can do about it--much as you want to keep the military-corporate complex sucking off the taxpayers' teats forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. When You're Reduced To Saying Something is "Inartful", You Lose
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mloutre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. And don't forget who's doing the inartful talking on McCain's behalf, too:
per TPM:

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/203960.php">Do Your Job: Stop Ignoring Scheunemann's Past

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. Using the "57 states" as an argument
really shows how desperate they are. Actually how IDIOTIC they are. The Senate hearings argument follows very close in idiocy level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Maliki didn't say what he said.
And Maliki just looked like he was agreeing with the question.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. Spokesman repeats his "inartful statement":
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. this is my favorite part
"Finally, as the McCain campaign's conference call commenced, word quickly spread that the Iraq's government spokesman, Ali al-Dabbagh, had insisted in a separate interview that Maliki still backed a plan in which U.S. combat forces would leave Iraq by 2010."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. When will someone bring up the fact that the translator used was the PM's and not the magazine's
Edited on Mon Jul-21-08 10:19 AM by Kdillard
and that there is a copy of the interview which shows there was no problem with the translation. They just need to stop before they futher embarass themselves. Barack Obama and his team must be rofl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. Gee, why are they so AFRAID of what Maliki said? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC