NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-21-08 02:52 PM
Original message |
| Is the NY Times deliberately working to get republicans elected? |
|
They seem to be developing quite the track record.
1) They sat on damaging information about Bush's criminal activity, so he could get elected in 2004
2) They run a lame hit piece on McCain's alleged affair, to increase McCain's credibility with right wingnuts
3) Now they refuse to run his Op-Ed piece, so the repukes can push the "liberal media" lie
Seems to me, they are doing everything possible to try and keep the repukes in the White House. The only unknown, is why.
|
| sharp_stick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-21-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. No, they refuse to run his op/ed piece |
|
because it didn't fit the definition of an op/ed piece and was merely another moronic campaign commercial. If mcsame were to actually write (or have a minion write) a real op/ed piece I'm sure they would be happy to run it.
|
| anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-21-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Any organization that has William Kristol on the payroll is not our friend. |
| Skwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-21-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I've wondered if they are for the whole "let's use the U.S. to redraw the Mideast map" concept. |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-21-08 04:00 PM by Skwmom
They sure were gung ho for the war and it's hard to believe they were that clueless.
|
| FreepFryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-21-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. The leadership of the NY Times is in it for power. They won't alienate the gvt and lose access. (nt) |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
