Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dee Dee Myers thinks Obama is and has been getting more favorable media attention?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:13 AM
Original message
Dee Dee Myers thinks Obama is and has been getting more favorable media attention?
Edited on Tue Jul-22-08 07:15 AM by babylonsister
Too bad she didn't mention how the media has completely ignored McCain's gaffes and screw-ups. I'd go with possibly more media attention (can you say Wright?), but not necessarily more favorable, at least not until this week.

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2008/07/is-the-media-trying-to-elect-obama.html

Is the Media Trying to Elect Obama?
by Dee Dee Myers
July 21, 2008, 5:15 PM


Tomorrow, CBS’s Katie Couric will interview Barack Obama from Jordan. On Wednesday, ABC’s Charlie Gibson will chat with him from Israel. And on Thursday, NBC’s Brian Williams will do the honors from Germany. Call it the presidential campaign equivalent of Shooting the Moon.

And to think, a few short months ago the Washington establishment was buzzing about the press’s pending dilemma: With Obama and John McCain looking like the all-but-certain nominees of their respective parties, how would the media choose between its new crush, Obama, and its long-time paramour, McCain? The Illinois senator has been a media darling since he burst onto the scene at the Democratic National Convention in the summer of 2004, and during the Democratic primary season, he bested Hillary Clinton in both quantity of coverage (he got more) and tenor (his was way more positive). But McCain has gotten so much favorable media attention over the years that he often joked that the press was his political base. In a head-to-head competition, who would win?

snip//

There are lot of “explanations” for the lopsided coverage: Obama is new and what’s new is “news.” As the first African-American to run a serious race, let alone win a major party’s nomination, Obama is running an historic campaign. Obama has created a “movement,” and Americans are simply more interested in him than in his opponents. Obama is running a smarter campaign, and he knows how to court media attention. It’s also true that intense media coverage is a double- edged sword: the attention is great when things are going well, but it can doom a candidate if and when things start to go badly. And so far, Obama has had way more good days than bad days. Each of those rationales is largely true—and somewhat less than satisfying.

At the end of the day, this will be a long campaign, and what’s true in July may not be true in November. But what seems indisputably true—to quote another dazzling young Democrat who received disproportionately favorable media attention, John Kennedy—is this: “Life is unfair.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. The best candidate always gets the better coverage.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Not so true in 2000.
Bush got great coverage. Media adored him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. He got it the old fashioned way... he earned it
where's the good news in McCain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think it's interesting that the department of defense seems to be endorsing him, too.
They could have edited the coverage differently. I think maybe they are sick of w.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. McCain keeps making stupid gaffes
...of course he is going to get negative coverage for it. Pundits are drooling idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's my point; he has hardly gotten any negative coverage. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. It is what is expected of him - he has done this stuff for years
Edited on Tue Jul-22-08 07:54 AM by Lastlaughin08
Nothing like having the bar on the "Low Expectations" setting.

Like the dimwit he hopes to succeed...............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. Kelly O'Donnell's coverage (NBC/MSNBC) of McCain is always glowing
Every time I see one of her reports from the McCain campaign, I'm left wondering if she's working to become McCain's press secretary or his next mistress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. I find it hard to think of someone named Dee Dee as an adult.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Way to keep building the straw man, DeeDee
It's like the six-week-long campaign to destroy Barack Obama via Rev. Wright never happened...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Thanks for getting my point. This is frustrating. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Remember how media obsessed with Obama's 'bowling score," and Rev. Wright's tirades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. yup , she was talking about this with none other than Joey the Scar the other day
It pissed me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe McCain is old news - 25+ years of doing nothing worthwhile
He represents the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. Maybe it's who looks and sounds "better" on TV
Look at McCain. Clumsy. Wound up. Antagonistic. Laughs at odd moments. Stiff. In front of small, tepid crowds.

Then look at Obama. Ernest. Honest. Dramatic. Handsome. In front of large, enthusiastic crowds.

Perhaps it looks like the media is "favoring" Obama. They aren't. Half of the media pundits keep misrepresenting Obama's record WHILE they give McCain an absolute free pass on his gaffes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Another Clintonite's squishy "support" for the Dem nominee: 2004 redux.
Edited on Tue Jul-22-08 08:52 AM by AtomicKitten
It's rather disconcerting watching Clinton surrogates again acting like they are a third party bent on undermining the Democratic nominee. Only a blind man could miss this pattern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. This shouldn't be surprising. The Clintonistas have been doing everything
Edited on Tue Jul-22-08 09:16 AM by Liberal_Stalwart71
to applaud and commend John McCain. Losers always blame the media instead of the abysmal campaign they ran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. McCain is lucky that he gets an endless amount of free passes
Edited on Tue Jul-22-08 08:52 AM by high density
He'd be polling down in Bush's numbers if the media wasn't so busy ignoring all of his flaws.

McCain's campaign hasn't been a source of good news, so he should really be happy that they're just ignoring him at this point. I don't know what good Dee Dee Myers thinks she's doing with a column like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
17. Maybe Obama gets better coverage because he's not making mistakes?
I think its unfair that Obama is running things smoothly where McCain is a misspeaking doofus and the media gets attacked for reporting things as they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
18. Dee Dee Myers works for Fox News
so she's a lying GOP propagandist. Believe nothing that comes from Fox News, or any other cable "News" outlet. They are all part of the McCain campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. Dee Dee Myers is an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. Now she's coming up on Hardball to 'elaborate'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. The media only covers viable candidates.

So we are not going to see much coverage of Nadar, Barr, McCain, the Green candidate, the Libertarian candidate, etc.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't know, DeeDee; IS THEY?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC