Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Spars With Couric Over Surge Success (Partial Transcript and VIDEO)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:30 PM
Original message
Obama Spars With Couric Over Surge Success (Partial Transcript and VIDEO)
Edited on Tue Jul-22-08 02:46 PM by jefferson_dem
Obama Spars With Couric Over Surge Success

22 Jul 2008 03:25 pm

Check out this exchange between CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric and Sen. Barack Obama about why Obama says he still wouldn't have supported the surge back then had he known it would help reduce violence so significantly.

Couric: But talking microcosmically, did the surge, the addition of 30,000 additional troops ... help the situation in Iraq?

Obama: Katie, as … you've asked me three different times, and I have said repeatedly that there is no doubt that our troops helped to reduce violence. There's no doubt.

Couric: But yet you're saying … given what you know now, you still wouldn't support it … so I'm just trying to understand this.

Obama: Because … it's pretty straightforward. By us putting $10 billion to $12 billion a month, $200 billion, that's money that could have gone into Afghanistan. Those additional troops could have gone into Afghanistan. That money also could have been used to shore up a declining economic situation in the United States. That money could have been applied to having a serious energy security plan so that we were reducing our demand on oil, which is helping to fund the insurgents in many countries. So those are all factors that would be taken into consideration in my decision-- to deal with a specific tactic or strategy inside of Iraq.

Couric: And I really don't mean to belabor this, Senator, because I'm really, I'm trying … to figure out your position. Do you think the level of security in Iraq …

Obama: Yes.

Couric … would exist today without the surge?

Obama: Katie, I have no idea what would have happened had we applied my approach, which was to put more pressure on the Iraqis to arrive at a political reconciliation. So this is all hypotheticals. What I can say is that there's no doubt that our U.S. troops have contributed to a reduction of violence in Iraq. I said that-- not just today, not just yesterday, but I've said that-- previously. What that doesn't change is that we've got to have a different strategic approach if we're going to make America as safe as possible.

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/07/obama_spars_with_couric_over_s.php


Short VIDEO clip here --- http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=4282980n

Contrast that bit of low-ball gotcha so-called "journalism" with this leading question for McSame ---

Couric: Senator McCain, Senator Obama says, while the increased number of US troops contributed to increased security in Iraq, he also credits the Sunni awakening and the Shiite government going after militias. And says that there might have been improved security even without the surge. What's your response to that?

McCain: I don't know how you respond to something that is as-- such a false depiction of what actually happened. Colonel McFarlane was contacted by one of the major Sunni sheiks. Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect that sheik and others. And it began the Anbar awakening. I mean, that's just a matter of history. Thanks to General Petraeus, our leadership, and the sacrifice of brave young Americans. I mean, to deny that their sacrifice didn't make possible the success of the surge in Iraq, I think, does a great disservice to young men and women who are serving and have sacrificed.

They were out there. They were protecting these sheiks. We had the Anbar awakening. We now have a government that's effective. We have a legal system that's working, although poorly. And we have progress on all fronts. Including-- an incredible measure of security for the people of Iraq. There will still be attacks. Al Qaeda's not defeated. But the progress has been immense. And to not recognize that, and why it happened, and how it happened, I think is-- is really quite a commentary.

Couric: A commentary on what?

McCain: That Senator Obama does not understand the challenges we face. And ... not understand the need for the surge. And-- and the fact that he did not understand that, and still denies that it has succeeded, I think the American people will make their judgment. And I think that they will agree with me, that at enormous sacrifice, after four years, nearly four years of failed strategy, we have succeeded. And our troops will come home with honor. And we won't be defeated. And there won't be chaos in the region. There won't be increased Iranian influence in the region. And it will have a bearing on what happens in Afghanistan, as well as the entire region of the world. And I'm proud of what they've done. And to deny their success-- I think is a fundamental misunderstanding of what happened. The American people will make a judgment.

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/07/mccain_disputes_obama_account.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're trying to get him to say the surge worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. How the hell do we know it "worked"? It's not over. We still have more troops there
than before the splurge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Somebody push that witch under a fast moving bus
She is an abomination to her sister Emily's (D-VA) memory. Cannot.Stand.Katie.Couric. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I wondered what fascist factoid
katy would try to push on Obama.

Obama can handle her just fine and it sounds like it frustrated her not to be able to understand him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Katie is simply ill suited for "serious news". She just was better at the morning show.
This is not an "attack on women". It's simply Couric getting promoted to a job she does not excel at. She just comes across as mean, in her attempt at trying to look "tough" and "serious".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. She is a total joke, I just do not know who is worse:
Andrea Mitchell or Katie Couric. Thank God that Obama sticks to his guns and is not ambivalent whenever he meets these talking heads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Andrea Mitchell is better at her job than Couric. We may not be fans,
but at least when she appears on TV, she doesn't come across like she is trying extra hard to look tough. She seems more natural in her role. Now her opinions OTOH are often off. But that is a different question. Couric, OTOH, looks like she is putting up an act that is anathema to her natural personality. It hurts to watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Hell, katy couric was mean spirited to John and Elizabeth
Edwards when she was interviewing them after they decided to go ahead with his candidacy.

I heard it..and that's the first and last I've watched anything she does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Same here
I was done with her after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. First person she had on her night time show was
rush limpbaughs..:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I forgot about that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Katie: Media Whore Numero Uno!
Why don't you go for a stroll there, little Miss Cheerleader Ho !?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:38 PM
Original message
Be careful, Andrea Mitchell and Campbell Brown are competing
for Media Whore 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. " have no idea what would have happened ...
had we applied my approach" - not the best wording....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. He could have said...There is usually more than one way to approach a problem,
Edited on Tue Jul-22-08 02:43 PM by cags
My approach would have worked as well...without the loss of american lives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. She asked the same questions 3 times........
trying to get the blunder and Obama proved to be one thousand times smarter than little Katie and the MSM.

Ha. Ha. Ha. and a


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is it not true, though, that we didn't see any results from the 'surge'
until we started bribing the leaders of the militias to stop shooting at us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. too bad he didn't reach over and slap her in the mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. LOL!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. What an embassassment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:50 PM
Original message
I can see the interviews getting tougher and tougher
As each person tries to get him to make a gaffe. The media has also taken not of this charge of being pro-Obama and they will probably try to be a little tougher with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. McSame: "There won't be increased Iranian influence in the region." Talk about delusional!
Iran's influence in the Middle East has grown exponentially since we invaded Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. They are trying really hard to get him to make a gaffe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. "But talking microcosmically"...
What does that mean? What's the frequency Katie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. Katie Couric is an idiot.
He's saying the funds in the troops in SA would have been better invested in our infrastructure and definitely the problematic situation that is pervasive in Afghanistan. She makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. I see no reason why Obama should be visiting Couric or why anyone else would be watching!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC