Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thank you Reed and Hagel.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 09:54 AM
Original message
Thank you Reed and Hagel.
Edited on Sun Jul-27-08 09:56 AM by peacetrain
Watching Face the Nation, Reed and Hagel came roaring to Obamas defense on the troop visit, and how he did visit all the troops well and injured on the congressional part of the trip. They called it out, the new ad by McCain as inappropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Harry Reid is on FTN?
Nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, REED. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for the catch
I just did an edit..Sometimes I am what you call a creative speller :)..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good job Senators!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. but it's not like they know anything about the military.. oh, wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dontforgetpoland Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. I especially liked when Hagel and Reed both debunked those silly McCain attack ads/talking points.

I wish Hagel would endorse Obama, but since he's a long time friend of McCain, he won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. He came about as close as you can come to endorsing
Obama. Especially calling out McCain on that dishonest ad. Good on you Chuck Hagel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't think they've been friends since the Iraq vote, have they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. The 2007 Feingold/Reid bill that Bush vetoed?
Bafore that Hagel always spoke more reasonablly than he voted. I remember Kerry and Biden quoting Lugar and Hagel in 2004 quite often on Iraq policy though.,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. i was VERY pleased. both senators were awesome. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I was so pleased with how both senators took it on. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. I didn't watch, but I'm glad to hear it. I expected Reed to stick up for Obama, but
wasn't sure if Hagel would do it--not sure where his loyalties lie. It must be hard to call out your old friend on national TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. We need to pick this up and drive it home.
The senators put it in perfect alignment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. I appreciate Hagel for being honest about the circumstances.
(still don't want him to be VP, though :) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. Big K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. I had not heard this. Thanks for the excellent news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Decider Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. HAGEL MADE IT VERY CLEAR: "JUDGEMENT MORE IMPORTANT THAN EXPERIENCE"

Both of these guys dished out bodyslams on behalf of Obama today.

No question that Chuck Hagel is sold on OBAMA'S leadership ability.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/27/hagel-reed-have-praise-for-obama/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks for the link
And great quote from Hagel

“Each candidate has strengths and weaknesses, and experience does matter,” Hagel said. “But what matters more in my opinion is character and judgment. And judgment meaning who is it that you bring around, who is it that you listen to? Can you make the right decisions for the right reasons on behalf of your country and the world?”


One more thing: welcome to DU :-).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. A couple of repubs out there actually have a conscience..
who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Yes they do... and thank GOD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. I knew sitting behind Obama in the Desert wasn't
Edited on Sun Jul-27-08 08:27 PM by zidzi
just for show with Reed and Hagel.



Thank you Senators for being the voice of personal experience!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The thing Hagel said that I really liked --
Edited on Sun Jul-27-08 08:23 PM by Phx_Dem
besides his defending Obama on cancelling the visit to injured troops and the slap down of McNasty -- was when he said "my country always comes before my party." I like that. I don't want him to be VP, but I would love to see him in the Obama administration in some other capacity. He's a good man, who happens to differ with most Democrats on policy but I think he would be a great "soldier" and serve Obama with honor.

Sorry, I meant to reply to the original post. :crazy:

(Mrs Phx_Dem)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. That's okay..I got to read it and
edit my spelling of "Reed":)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtboss Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
24. SWIFTBOAT ALERT
Where the ef is the vaunted Democratic response to this BS???? We've heard for 4 years from strategists that Dems won't let it happen again...where's the response? I'm still waiting. And no, Obama shouldn't and won't do this dirty work. There has to be someone out there ready to be vicious. Remember paying the hooker to say her baby was Clinton's??? That's what I'm talking about (at least be prepared to go that low). Here we need a response ad so mean and insulting that IT WILL CHANGE THE SUBJECT. That's the only way you combat this. If you engage, you just push the story. You need to be MORE outlandish than the GOP attack to get the switch the media's focus! Where do I send my money??? Is anyone going to do this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtboss Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. We Need a To Change the Media's Subject...Get Dirty, Play Hardball
That's the only way to beat this sort of stuff. Counter with more vicious ad against McCain. And it can't come from Obama. Let him denounce it, but get the attention and retaliate with a harder attack. Make the media follow your story. Kerry played their game, and by ignoring and then engaging it he let himself be swiftboated. The solution is a 527 or something like it to hit McCain where it hurts. Rumors, innuendo, mockery...this is about a WAR and healthcare. This is too risky to let McCain get away with swiftboating Obama. So, someone tell me where to donate. Or let's make it happpen ourselves if there isn't anyone with balls enough to do it. Remember how Bush did McCain in S. Carolina? Drugs, traitor, etc. I think the traitor stuff has the most appeal here. An add saying he betrayed his own would switch the subject in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Blah de blah de blah blah blah. We got it on to the next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtboss Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. What?
Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Run your traitor stuff up your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtboss Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. What do you propose? Ignore it? Engage It?
You want to win honorably? So did Gore. So did Kerry. So does Obama. The idea was to have some balls for once and not get SWIFTBOATED. Obama, rightly, doesn't like this stuff. To pretend it isn't effective is just willful blindness. The press goes for the juicy story. You have to give them something with more buzz, more controversy, more juice. You do that, all the sudden they aren't talking about this BS smear job about not wanting to visit troops. And do you really think McCain deserves being treated respect after he's basically made a point of calling Obama a traitor himself? Retaliate. Lex Talionis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I'd leave the traitor tact alone too.
It has too much backfire potential. I'm talking about hitting him on competence and command of the issues.

Let's make experience meaningless, after all the point of experience is to learn, we can flood the airwaves with plenty to introduce reasonable doubt into the equation.
It's take to make this more about McCain and less about Obama. McCain is getting a stroll through the park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtboss Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Incompetence is Good
Scene of McCain gaffe, cut to Bush gaffe, cut again to another McCain gaffe, cut to the picture of McCain hugging Bush and have a red stamp graphic, INCOMPETENT. That way you link in his senile dementia, his stupidity, the Bush III angle... Works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. WTF are you hoping to incite.... anyway??
the sore thumb analogy seems to apply here..:think:

Welcome to DU! :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtboss Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Attacks Against McCain
Apparently, Dem strategists have all been talking smack about not letting the Democratic candidate get swiftboated. That, or they have no clue what they're doing. I wish the universe we lived wasn't driven by sensationalism. I wish it were about issues and substantive discussions. But that's not our universe. We live in an environment where McCain can go around spreading utter lies about Obama, painting him as unAmerican, hating the troops and media will just pass it along. Hell, they'll even amplify the story by discussing the relative merits of it...all the while knowing it's garbage. The only way any one has figured out how to kill one of these malicious stories is to counter it...that or you get lucky and a natural disaster/national emergency grabs media attention. Countering requires something more salacious and TMZish making the other guy deal with a smear. Since this has been discussed ad nauseum over the past 4 years, it should hardly surprise anyone. What is surprising is that no one seems able to point to any group that intends to defend Obama from the flank this way. It's as if all that talk was just sounding tough. Progressives haven't always been pussies you know. Saul Alinsky? You have to deal with the world as it is, not in some ideal world. In that ideal world Gore won in 2000 after he got his recount, we didn't go war and the economy is going great...gas is 1.50 a gallon. So, I don't think there's anything confusing about this. Remember, debunking merely develops the story, ignoring it leaves it out there as supposed factual truth. If you have a superior strategy, let's hear it, and you can become a top political advisor in DC. Right now, it appears Obama is vulnerable to this crap. And it's all us that have let him down. He can't touch this crap or condone it. Remember Clinton got accused of several kids out of wedlock....one was prostitute? These guys will get vicious, we know it's coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
34. I think it's great Hagel has defended Obama in terms of
McNasty's attack ad. I watched the interview and agree with one other poster in this thread that Hagel won't endorse him, but he's done pretty much everything but endorse him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Just finished reading that the push back against the machine
is in full force. Apparently Scarborough got his hands slapped this morning for trying to mis characterize the situation. Fortunately for us, the other side does not have a very good learning curve. They set themselves up to be slapped back in the stupidest fashion. This has got to be a topper. Especially against the war hero meme. Attacking Obama as not visiting the troops with a commercial showing him with the troops, can you believe it??

Especially when he visited troops sick and healthy in the war zones, HELLO!.. He just refused to have them used in a political attack, which of course the republicans decided to do. This one is going to backfire big time. There are the dead heads who will buy it up, they still believe Obama is a Muslim, they know better, but it is all they have to cling too, their own self delusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC