Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FRAME THIS: The term "surge" is a Bushspeak term. The REAL term is "escalation"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 06:45 PM
Original message
FRAME THIS: The term "surge" is a Bushspeak term. The REAL term is "escalation"
I get tired of the media and hearing the Obama campaign refer to the "surge" as the "surge".

The term "surge" is a poll-watched, confabricated, focus-group spawn Bushspeak term.

It IMMEDIATELY needs to be termed the "so called Surge", or more precisely, the Escalation. Hundreds of millions of dollars and 1,000 troops and thousands of injured troops as well as uncounted Iraqis were part of this plan. People also seem to forget the the whole notion of what was considered an "attack" was changed. If someone is shot in the back of the head, that's not considered an "attack". The victim now needs to be shot in the front of the head in order for a "attack" notch to be applied.

In summary, whenever anyone someone refers to "the Surge", it should actually be called "the Escalation". We need to have people have visions of dancing Lyndon Johnson war escalation quagmire in people's heads.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. The continuing escalation.
That the Iraqi government wants to end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
2.  the urge to surge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very good point!
I'll add that to my arsenal of retorts. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree and I don't know why Democrats haven't picked that up.
It's a big mistake by Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yah - I tried to get DUers off of bush-speak back when it started. Didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would Frame it differently - I would characterize "The Surge"
as a correction of the miscalculation of actual troops that should have been deployed in Iraq from the beginning.

Whew...okay so that is a bit long winded but that is exactly what happened. The Rethuglicans want Americans to think that "The Surge", was some brilliant, strategic move to ensure an American victory, when in reality they fired or forcefully retired any Military Brass that said how many troops really were needed to keep the peace from the very beginning.

Even Escalation is correcting the original miscalculation of needed troops.

But either way they fucked up and we need to point it out to the media and all other Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Actually, NO troops should have deployed at the beginning,
Edited on Sun Jul-27-08 09:47 PM by tblue37
because there never should have been an invasion of Iraq at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, there is that point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think they're saving the term Escalation for Iran.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. 'Surge' sounds more manly
If you're surging, you ain't withdrawing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Perhaps other words for Bushspeak...
blather, blatherskite, double talk, gabble, gibberish, jabber, jabberwocky, jargon, nonsense, prattle, twaddle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. McCain keeps saying we have lost
when in reality we have already won. Bush conducted the war for the purpose of overthrowing Saddam Hussein. That's been done. What we have in Iraq now is an occupation in the midst of a civil war. I cannot for the life of me understand why McCain seeks an escalation of the occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Don't forget about the
fact that "the surge" was actually supposed to lead to political goals, which were not met or accomplished. So, in fact, the surge did not work and did result in an escalation. Reduction in violence was not the endgame, it was a step in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-27-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. "Escalating the Occupation of Iraq" is my suggestion/nomination in place of "Surge"
Edited on Sun Jul-27-08 11:18 PM by Land Shark
Any occupation that must be escalated is obviously an unwelcome and/or divisive occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. A very good description of what is ACTUALLY happening
The words "escalation" and "occupation" combined with "unwanted" need to be drummed into everyone's head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. McBush continues to belch a noun, a verb, and "the surge."
The loons are inflicted with tunnel vision thinking Obama is disputing that the escalation created improved security. Nobody is disputing that the extra troops brought extra security, but that was a tool employed to foster political reconciliation - the actual purpose of the surge before the goalposts were moved yet again - and they missed the mark in that regard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
16. Another word we used in the war protests last September....
... THE SPLURGE.

In blood and treasure. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. everything about the war is bushspeak - lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC