AP: McCain backs off his no - new - tax pledge (He is now pissing away fiscal conservative

[Perky]

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Republican presidential candidate John McCain's signal that he may be open to a higher payroll tax for Social Security, despite previous vows not to raise taxes of any kind, is drawing sharp rebukes from conservatives.

McCain's shift has come in stages, catching some Republicans by surprise. Speaking with reporters on his campaign bus on July 9, he cited a need to shore up Social Security. ''I cannot tell you what I would do, except to put everything on the table,'' he said.

He went a step farther Sunday on ABC's ''This Week,'' in response to a question about payroll tax increases.

''There is nothing that's off the table. I have my positions, and I'll articulate them. But nothing's off the table,'' McCain said. ''I don't want tax increases. But that doesn't mean that anything is off the table.''

That comment drew a strong response this week from the Club for Growth, a Washington anti-tax group. McCain's comments, the group said in a letter to the Arizona senator, are ''shocking because you have been adamant in your opposition to raising taxes under any circumstances.''

Indeed, McCain frequently has promised not to raise taxes.

At a July 7 town-hall meeting in Denver, he said voters faced a stark choice between him and Democrat Barack Obama.

''Sen. Obama will raise your taxes,'' McCain said. ''I won't.''

In a March 16 interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity, McCain said he would cut taxes where possible, and not raise them.

''Do you mean none?'' Hannity asked.

''None,'' McCain replied.

Both candidates have said Social Security's funding formula needs to be changed to ensure the program's long-term viability. Obama has called for imposing a new payroll tax on incomes above $250,000. Currently, only incomes up to $102,000 are subject to the 12.4 percent payroll tax, which employers and employees split evenly.

When Obama announced his plan June 13, McCain's top economic adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, told reporters that as president McCain would not consider a payroll tax increase ''under any imagineable circumstance.''

McCain has made no specific proposals for Social Security, refusing to rule in or out anything to strengthen the benefit program for retirees and the disabled. Both candidates have said that, if elected, they would try to work out details with Republican and Democratic lawmakers.

Asked for an explanation of McCain's latest comments, campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds said the Arizona senator ''has a clear and demonstrated record of opposing tax increases. John McCain is going to cut taxes'' and improve government discipline, he said.

Promises never to raise taxes have bedeviled past Republican officeholders. Before being elected president in 1988, George H.W. Bush said, ''Read my lips, no new taxes.'' But facing severe budget problems, he reneged on the promise. Some conservative groups never forgave him.

[Bake]

1. McAnus is just phoning it in. He doesn't really want to win ...

If he did, he wouldn't alienate a very vocal and large segment of the conservative base. Hey John, "read my lips."

Bake

[pansypoo53219]

2. poo. only hits the working poor.

his base gets georgee's tax cuts made permanent.

[Jakes Progress]

3. This won't bother the republicans.

Being anti-tax is just a bit of ideology with them. They never let their principles stand in the way of their winning.

They use it in the primary, but they have already started the talking point that Obama will tax us all to death. I heard it six times on the television yesterday. They know that the republicans will protect them. They say they are against taxes, but what they mean is they are against taxes on them. They see putting mccain in office as a way to keep getting the money from the poor, not from them.

Again. republicans have no true beliefs. Fear and greed are their only driving forces. Everything else is rhetoric.

(Now this didn't seem to be the case many years ago. In my youth I had discussions with passionate conservatives that believed that their policies were actually beneficial for all Americans. They would have logical explanations and support their views with historical and factual documentation. We disagreed, but it was about facts. I haven't had a conversation with a true believer in years. It's all hysteria and pandering.)