BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:24 PM
Original message |
Poll question: If it came down to this choice for VP, whom would you pick? |
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Pro-Choice, obviously... |
|
Backpedaling on Women's reproductive rights is just not an option.
|
jesus_of_suburbia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Pro-choice! And Pro Gay rights! |
jesus_of_suburbia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Guess that leave Nunn out. Stupid idiot. |
Beacool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Pro-choice and pro-gay rights. |
|
No Kaine, no Nunn!!!
Are we the Republican or Democratic party? Did this need to be even asked?
|
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. I hope people look at Kaine and think "Anti-choice" |
|
'cause that's what he is.
Boo, Kaine! :insert smiley giving rasberry and holding sign saying 'You don't rock':
|
JerseygirlCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
13. Yup. Two very important issues, because anyone willing to sell |
|
another's civil rights has some serious issues with democracy.
|
1Hippiechick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Pro whatever. I was just impressed that you knew to use "whom" instead of "who" in your post! :) |
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Can I call you chimpsy? ;)
:hi:
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. I actually want to call you something nicer. |
|
On account of I like you.
:loveya:
|
1Hippiechick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
16. LOL...not wonder. And you edit....what? n/t |
TooBigaTent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Does not the inclusive, big-tent approach of Sen. Obama dictate that both opinions be |
|
respected and valid? Therefore, whatever the VP-nominee believes is OK by me.
|
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. Not when choice is threatened. |
|
It's not ok with me if Obama puts someone against choice in position to be next in line for the presidency. We've had enough of that position for the last seven years.
|
livetohike
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-29-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Pro-choice, because I'm old enough to remember when there |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 08:47 PM
Response to Original message |