Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT, Herbert: "Obama will have to turn people on bigtime just to win by a little." How? The economy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 05:52 PM
Original message
NYT, Herbert: "Obama will have to turn people on bigtime just to win by a little." How? The economy.
Can Obama Run the Offense?
By BOB HERBERT
Published: July 29, 2008

....Senator Obama will have to turn people on big-time just to win by a little. And for all the tedious talk about timelines and what the surge in Iraq has or has not accomplished, the top three issues in this campaign are still the economy, the economy and the economy. Americans are losing jobs, losing the equity in their homes, losing their retirement nest eggs, and tragically, in increasing numbers, actually losing the family home itself. This is the issue on which the Obama people should long since have pounced.

A recent survey found that an overwhelming majority of Americans believe that the social contract of the 20th century — in which the government, employers and the society as a whole pulled together to see that those who worked hard and played by the rules were afforded the basic necessities of daily life and a shot at the American dream — “appears to be unraveling.” Nearly 80 percent of those who responded to the survey, conducted for the Rockefeller Foundation and Time magazine, said they are facing greater financial risks now than in the past.

This anxiety is pervasive, and it was clearly evident a little more than two weeks ago when Phil Gramm, then John McCain’s key economic adviser, callously remarked that we were suffering from a “mental recession” and that the U.S. had become “a nation of whiners.” The Obama crowd should have instantly seen the Gramm gaffe for what it was, a gift from the political gods. They should have run with it....The Democrats could have had some fun and made political hay, using the Gramm comments to highlight what has happened to working people under Republican rule. But the Obama folks let the matter drop, and instead of an endless loop of “mental recession,” what we’ve heard incessantly over the past couple of weeks has been Mr. McCain pounding on Mr. Obama about the surge.

The word is that an economic offensive may finally be coming from the Obama campaign. Anna Burger, the secretary-treasurer of the Service Employees International Union, was part of a wide-ranging group of advisers on economic issues who met with Mr. Obama in Washington on Monday. “He has very serious policies, not sound bites, for addressing the long-term and short-term issues that are having such a dramatic effect on people who are working and trying to make ends meet,” she said.

Translating those ideas into a compelling economic narrative for his campaign — something Mr. Obama has not yet done — is the key to defeating John McCain.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/opinion/29herbert.html?_r=1&hp&oref=login
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hogwash. Just more phoney media 'buzz' to create a phoney "close race".
No contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't Bob Herbert a Republican?
I seem to remember him on Hardball one day saying he thought McCain was really ahead and not Obama. Despite the state polls giving Obama a clear advantage. Tweety in his usual wishy-washy self agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Herbert was really, really supportive of Obama, all through the primaries...
but disagreed with him on FISA, and has had some criticism in a couple of columns about his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nice to see that Herbert is on the "why can't he seal the deal" bandwagon.
Fucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It seems like when writers need an angle..
sometimes they chose the wrong one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC