Personally I don't think Kaine is the right pick. You should offset yourself somewhat and the fact that Tim might take off before serving the full term (one term at a time in Va.) wouldn't go over too well especially with the people who report on politics around here (read: the are stuck in RED STATE Va.).
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/07/vice_president_tim_kaine.htmlAs with all potential Veep picks, there are pluses and minuses. Let's start with Kaine's advantages:
1. Personal Chemistry-Harvard Law, Kansas
2. Emphasis on Domestic Policy
3. Out-of-Washington Change
4. Virginia
5. Special Qualities
There are no perfect people, and that goes double for VP picks. So Kaine brings certain disadvantages and baggage to Obama, too:
1. Lack of Experience Where It Is Most Needed
2. The Hillary Factor
3. Kaine's Governorship-Sabato displays conventional wisdom of Va. pol writers that is -ignore that everything has been blocked by a Republican party in the midst of a civil war itself.
4. The Aftermath in Virginia-Lt.Gov Bolling (R) would take over and THEN get to run for a full term
--From the Norfolk/Tidewater newspaper--
Top 10 reasons not to choose Kaine
http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_kainebox2_0730jul30,0,5485498.storyNo. 10: It doesn't really matter. See No. 10 reason to choose Kaine.
No. 9: He's too partisan. An aggressive campaigner, Kaine is all too eager to take on Republicans. During the transportation debate this year, he essentially dared the GOP to put up or shut up. Obama talks about breaking down old barriers. Does Kaine fit the mold?
No. 8: Drop the prepared text. To put it nicely, one candidate on the Obama-Kaine team would be really good at giving prepared speeches. Reading from a teleprompter would have to be kept to a minimum.
No. 7: Tim who? With fewer than 100 days until Election Day, will Kaine have enough time to sell himself to voters outside Virginia?
No. 6: Kaine would leave Virginia to the Republicans. If Kaine is elected vice president, Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, a conservative Republican, moves into the Executive Mansion and could run for a full term in 2009.
No. 5: Lack of executive experience. Yes, this experience thing cuts both ways. Kaine has been governor since only 2006. Before that, he was the council-appointed mayor of Richmond. Republicans could exploit an Obama-Kaine ticket as too young and inexperienced.
No. 4: Kaine's record, or lack thereof, as governor. Since taking office in 2006, Kaine has failed to rally support for a transportation funding plan. He pushed through reforms in mental health, but that was propelled by the Virginia Tech tragedy.
No. 3: Kaine and Obama are very much alike. Is that a good thing? Why not balance the ticket with a governor like Pennsylvania's Ed Rendell, who backed Hillary Clinton and appeals to blue-collar voters?
No. 2: No foreign policy experience. Voters remain concerned about fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the ticking time bomb that is Iraq. Kaine's missionary experience doesn't exactly prepare him for geopolitics.
No. 1: The top reason not to choose Kaine? The Eyebrow. You know what we mean. Kaine's arcing eyebrow is the only thing most people remember about the governor's Democratic response to the State of the Union address in 2006. Don't believe us? Google " Tim Kaine eyebrow" and see what you get.