Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: "Did the Obama campaign know about Edwards?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:34 AM
Original message
CNN: "Did the Obama campaign know about Edwards?"
Slimeball CNN anchor John Roberts: "All the Democratic campaigns did exhaustive opposition research on all the other campaigns. DID THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN KNOW ABOUT EDWARDS' INFIDELITY?"
(paraphrased)

Yeah, let's throw THAT speculation out there.
Woohoo.

If so, so what?
Is you implication that the Obama campaign was less than forthcoming?
That they're guilty of a coverup?
That they should have ratted Edwards out?
Oh that would have played well in the national media.
"DIRTY POLITICS"
"POLITICS OF PERSONAL DESTRUCTION"
"OBAMA A SNITCH"

And on and on, ad nauseum.
<cue limbo record>
How Low Can You Go, CNN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good God. And it's going to get worse. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm with you, so freaking what if they did? Not their business, as he's not VP pick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Crappy News Network. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Big deal.
Everyone knows about McCain's infidelity and no one seems to care. So, whether or not Obama knew about Edward's affair is supposed to be an issue? Too silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Roberts on McCain's infidelity: "Ancient history."
That's what he said when the Dem commentator brought it up.
We already knew that.
Nothing new to see here.
Move along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. My reply to that is why was where Obama went to elementary school an issue?
Seriously, when it's a Repug, it's ancient history. When it's a Democrat, then it's relevant to who they are now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. MEANWHILE ... they give airtime to William Ayers ...
BO was in elementary school when OTHER people did what WU did ...

But, by 6 degrees of seperation, and 40 years later, they give the repukes air time about William Ayers ...

Ds HAVE to keep pushing McCains' infidelity to make the MSM drop Edwards ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. my gosh, how desperate!
I turned on GMA this morning at 7, and their Edwards headline of choice was "Edwards affair...WOULD CLINTON HAVE WON THE NOMINATION???" Uh, ok GMA. There are several scenarios that could have played out, it's typical that they would try to spin it in a way that spurs resentment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dollface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. CNN is slipping. It took them 3 days to come up with a way to tie it to Obama.
cnnis a waste of the airwaves. Whatever disease Faux had, they caught it a while ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Well, they were trying the "is Edwards gonna speak at teh convention" route first.
Wringing blood from stones takes time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. I posted last week ...
People WANTED to believe that Edwards' infidelity would be something that "hurt" McCain ...

I repeat ... The MSM will cycle though ANYTHING it can to somehow skunk BO with this, until the dots start to connect to McCain ... Then, it will be immediately spiked as a story ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. Took puma about a minute to blame Obama
In comments after articles some posters claim 'that thug Obama' blackmailed him out of the race and then blackmailed him to force the endorsement.

Who was Obama going to tell they don't explain...National Enquirer already had a couple articles. Have a press conference to declare he believed the article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Counter question: "Did the McCain campaign know about McCain?". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Does McCain remember his own infidelity? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. The McCain campaign will keep their lips zipped about this
They don't want to invite unfavorable comparisons with the behavior of their
own man. It's an easy tack to take when every TV channel out there is willing
to do your dirty work for you for free.

Arm's length and free of charge. Such a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. How old are these incompetents? If anyone knew about it, it was the Clintons.
Edited on Mon Aug-11-08 07:54 AM by poli speak
They and their helpers are the masters of opposition research. The only difference they couldn't go out and "discredit" the woman this time; they had to sit on their honches. The thought of that gives me no glee. I wonder what they think they have on Obama. I used to be their biggest fans. Daily, they discredit themselves, more than I ever would have thought, e.g. insinuations/comments about roll calls and Mr.Obama not ready to be President. They have become shameless. Like Obama said about midway thru the primaries, they learned the WRONG lesson. They still want to engage in the politics of smear and innuendo, and still think it will work. How narsisctic they have become. Sad, sad, sad. I wish they weren't showing up at the convention instead of the Edwards. I wouldn't be surprised with the timing, if they weren't the ones that leaked this, to get more "show time," "told you so" time. This is sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
38. That's pretty funny
Attributing narcissism to the Clintons when the story is about Edwards. Do you have any idea what would have happened if edwards has been the presumptive nominee when this story came out? Talk about narcissism. If edwards even shows his face at the convention, I'll never forgive him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. u r not funny. delusioned, would b more like it. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Wasn't trying to be funny
NOthing funny about John Edwards running for the nomination with this story just waiting to explode. He could have destroyed the party and people like you still bitch about the Clintons. THAT I find very amusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. and so why didn't they just explode it? not blackmail you think? that is naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Why didn't who explode it?
I'm guessing English is not your first language and that's fine but you're not being clear in who you're accusing of blackmail. And it's been around 30 years since someone has called me naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
67. hatred of all things Clinton is reaching epidemic proportions on DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #67
74. Look behind you
That line was crossed long ago. Remember all the crap about Hillary staying with Bill even after his infidelity(ies)? I'm not hearing a fraction of that regarding Elizabeth Edwards and she was fighting cancer at the time. The hypocrisy is overwhelmingly amusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. If the media dares bring Obama into this then Obama campaign must hit McCain on his
affair with his barbie doll wife while married to a sick spouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. Serpenthead said this a.m. that it's JE's "fault" that HRC lost the primaries.
puh-leeze. IT'S OBAMA'S FAULT, silly! HE RAN & WON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. is serpent head James Carville?
I saw that too! I thought maybe he would say "Well, you can't speculate about things in the past" or something, but of course he said "Yes, I think that we could definitely speculate that! I think that she WOULD have done better!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
46. LOL HRC thwarted by a sleazy married man, again. How karmic.
Edited on Mon Aug-11-08 11:36 AM by elehhhhna
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. She doesn't deserve that kind of ugliness
Edited on Mon Aug-11-08 11:50 AM by PurityOfEssence
Whether one likes her or not, once upon a time she actually risked her political future to do something good and decent for the American people. For this, she was roundly trounced and humiliated, but she DID it. That's more than anything that can be said about Mr. Obama: he's NEVER taken a risky stand that benefitted the common folk. Never. Period.

For people to revel in her embarrassment at the hands of her husband is just filthy. She stood by her man and she was publicly vilified for it. The jackals who asked her in public about Spitzer not only have no manners, they have no souls.

Add up her whole political career, IWR and all, and stack it against Obama's, and it's remarkably similar. Take a away the IWR, for which he was not called to account, and hers is more populist than his, and that's a damning thing to say.

Glorying in her further humiliation from a man's infidelity is out of line, to put it delicately.

(edited for spelling)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. true, she doesn't deserve it, but she evidently attracts it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
57. That's his nickname given to him by, I believe, his wife, Republican strategist Mary Matalin. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. I knew this BS would be brought up... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. Who the F. cares if the Obama campaign knew?
The media knows about McCain's affair, and they are actively supressing the story. Who is the complicit party in marital infidelity here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
66. Except it's the Clintons that acted on it, and now all the rats are jumping the ship.
Obama is in the clear on this one, no doubt about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
15. Self delete
Edited on Mon Aug-11-08 08:10 AM by TechBear_Seattle
Double post, sorry about that. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. it had been a rampant rumor - even on DU, since at least last November
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. Obama campaign: We didn't know about Edwards, but we do know about McCain
Edited on Mon Aug-11-08 08:20 AM by GloriaSmith
Would you be interested in hearing more? ;)

That would be my suggested response anyway...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. Heh heh . . .
Good answer, Gloria. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
49. Great framing
That would be the PERFECT response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
19. MSM policy: Obama guilty for the sins of others, while McSame gets passes for his own sins (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
20. Even if they did know, it's not their place to alert the press
Especially because, after NH, Edwards was not a serious threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Can you imagine the
(well deserved) outrage if they did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #29
62. Exactly so. If they'd disclosed it, they would have been guilty of dirty
campaigning. Similarly, Biden had to drop out in '88 over the plagiarism revelations, but the Dukakis campaign's reputation was sure not enhanced at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
24. John Roberts: Does the CNN staff know about McCain's infidelity?
Certainly if we feed off Edwards or Rev. Wright, then we can certainly look at how McCain was able to snag a marriage license with a $100 million beer heiress WHILE he still wasn't divorced from his first wife, who he was cheating on and called fat after she was in a car accident.

If Obama had gotten a marriage license before he got divorced, I can only imagine the shark attacks from the media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
27. Did the McCain campaign know about it? And who gives a shit?
Guilt by association? F-you, you stuffed, made-up DUMMY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
30. He took off in the national polls when Edwards dropped out.
If they knew, they kept it secret for all the right (non-political) reasons.

http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/08-us-dem-pres-primary.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Obama was surging through January
because of the Iowa win, the Kerry and Kennedy announcements and the big SC win. Look at the graph there is no discontinuity at January 30 th. It did help his numbers increase because some came to him - and some to HRC. There was no certainty which way the ewdards people would go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #37
51. look at the graph. the slope steepens at the end of january.
Could he have done it with Edwards in the race? Perhaps. My point is that the steepest increase came when Edwards dropped out after SC, and possibly continued longer because he dropped out. Again, though, it's possible Obama's rise could have continued with Edwards in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #51
61. That is also when the Kennedys endorsed him on Jan 28th
Edited on Mon Aug-11-08 05:24 PM by karynnj
The fact is that Edwards was already off his peak - and some of his supporters stayed with Edwards, some went to undecided, and some added to both Clinton and Obama. You are only speaking of at most 10% - and they didn't all go to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Changenow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
31. Did the Clinton campaign?
Clinton supporters published it, which would indicate they wanted it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
33. Since the Obama camp stayed away from Edwards as VP, maybe they did.
Everyone in the campaigns knew about John getting challenged last fall on having a girlfriend. He denied it, but I'm sure folks in Obama's campaign sniffed it out. They may have put a question mark beside his name because of it.

The Obama campaign is smartly run, and that includes knowing what is going on around them.

When John got busted at 2 AM in the hotel by the tabloid media, that's when I knew it was all true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
34. Goes both ways
Did Hillary know?

What was the talk about after the debate?
Why did Edwards suddenly drop out after the talk with Hillary just before Super Tuesday?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darius15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
35. I told you guys
that the dumbasses in the media are going to try to connect Obama & Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
36. Did the RNC?
Which was likely putting together portfolios on all three starting in 2006 or 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
39. Clinton Had Far More To Gain than Obama by Keeping Edwards In The Race. Why don't they ask that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
40. I don't know if the Obama campaign did know about it. I'm pretty sure the Clinton campaign didn't..
know about it before the IA caucuses. If this would have come out in December, then Edwards' assumed dominance in Iowa would have been over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
41. Assholes...it took the National Enquirer following him to a hotel at 2 in the morning to break this
Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
42. I Have A Pic Of Edwards With His Arm Around Me, Does That Count?
From 2004 campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
44. Maybe, But CNN Knew & Said Nothing
like the rest of the MSM - or maybe like me, Barack Obama had the feeling Edwards was lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
45. If so, it's to his credit that they didn't run negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. Exactly - If Obama Did Know, Then He Took The High Road
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
52. What if he did?
First of all Barack Obama is not John Edwards confessor or keeper. Second if Obama did know he may have decided that it was not up to him to set the record straight on Edwards. He may just have decided that it's none of his business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. Not necessarily
What if they forced him out over this, promising to keep it quiet? Not only would that not be above the fray, it'd be pretty creepy.

Obama's campaign is based on an extreme altruism and the sheer glory of his sterling personality. He's already played the "I didn't know about what my subordinates did" card a few times; the disillusionment could be quite a hit to his mystique.

His supporters are right in one respect that he's a "different kind of candidate": he's going to be held to a different standard because that's what he claimed set him apart. This is why the disillusionment crops up when he tacks hard to the right on the death penalty, abortion rights, drilling, spying and other non-liberal policies: he was supposed to be incorruptible and engaging in "new" politics, not the same old maneuvering.

Sadly, the threshold of disappointment will be lower for him because he claimed that it should be so high.

Let's hope he can keep up the momentum, and let's hope he either had nothing to do with this or doesn't get caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
53. Unreal

John Edwards has ABSOLUTELY NO RELATION to the Obama campaign, NONE, NONE, NONE...the only similirities are they both ran for the Democratic nomination to be President: Edwards lost, Obama won. That's the only relation.

Edwards was NEVER under consideration for the VP spot and even if he was, so damn what. This is unbelievable to even be an issue...that damn Librul media again? Can't keep them leftists from propagandizing everything now can we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
54. What does Obama have to do with it? As long as Edwards isn't on the Veep list, then
it has no bearing on the Obama campaign.

How stupid and sensationalist our media has become!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
59. did he know? of course, but it has nothing to do with barack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
60. There were rumors but so what? What were they supposed to do?
I'd throw the question back to CNN. When did they know and why did they sit on the story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggieblue Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. Edwards as VP - No way!!!
The first time I saw John Edwards on television he was standing with the Kerrys with his back to his wife and seemed to not want to look at wife. I thought it was so weird and very tacky. By the end of the time he was on television that evening I didn't like him or how he treated his wife. I never saw him look at his wife as if he loved her. He's an opportunist. It would make me sick if Obama wanted him to be his VP. I think we have a right to expect our top representatives to love their wives and children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Willo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
64. Did CNN know that McCain is gaffe prone
and decide to selectively air, pre-recorded stump clips, to hide the truth that McCain is an idiot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
68. the f***ing NATIONAL ENQUIRER knew
of course the Obama campaign knew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
69. O'Liely admitted (Fox) knew about the story quite a
while ago but they were apparently sitting on it to use if Edwards got the nomination or was selected as the VP candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-11-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. I do know O'Reilly really talked mad shit about Edwards during the primaries
constantly saying dude was a "phony" and that he deserved no respect... he never said why he was so harsh on John, but he was... he never treated Hillary or Obama like that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franc_Lee Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
71. CNN promoted the Iraq war withouut investigating any claims from the WH. they're
complaisant in the selling of the war. Someone should start a thread asking;
"Did CNN help promote the lead up to the war in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
72. I'll bet both the Clinton AND Obama campaigns knew about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franc_Lee Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
73. Yeah, sp what, get over it Americans, the French don't give a sh*t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC