Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 01:06 PM
Original message |
I hear Brokaw was pretty tough on Pawlenty today. |
|
True or not? I missed it.
|
crazylikafox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 01:08 PM
Original message |
|
He didn't even correct Pawlenty when he "forgot" to mention Obama's entire Illinois State Senate experience
|
yourguide
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I expected Brokaw to take it easy on the choice. He asked some hard questions but hasnt mentioned the Palin investigation that the McCain camp is now calling "a family matter"...
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Where the hell did you hear that? |
|
Pawlenty said that Palin managing a household budget qualified her to oversee the federal budget.
Do you think Brokaw said boo about it?
Please.
|
Beaverhausen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message |
3. somewhat. My problem is these guys never ask follow-ups |
|
plus, there wasn't one democrat on the panel for the next segment where they all discussed her. I mean come on, I'm sure one democrat would have liked to have taken part.
|
CherokeeDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Brokaw never challenged Pawlenty on any comments that he made on Palin. He asked a couple of good questions but in the face of the regurgitated Repub talking points, Brokaw never asked the follow-up questions which could and should have been hard hitting. Tool.
|
yourguide
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
First round questions were pretty good. No follow ups. sucky.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message |