http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/08/30/palin-is-mccains-bridge-to-nowhere-thanks-but-no-thanks/Wasn't "Thanks but no thanks" a line from the DNC? Who said that, anyway? Oh yeah, BILL CLINTON. What, are they stealing our good lines, now?
Anyway, plagiarism aside, the whole thing is a lie; Palin supported the bridge until the last minute after which point supporting it would be totally, not just mostly, pointless. Only a matter of time before MSM catches on to this one (Rachael Maddow already mentioned it on Friday
http://www.jedreport.com/2008/08/rachel-maddow-palin-supported.html). Getcha popcorn. Her first 5 seconds of national attention, and she's caught in a verifiable lie.
You all probably knew that already. But I did want to draw more attention to this mudflats blog. Isn't it fun to read?
So, if Congress had gone along and coughed up what Stevens and Young had asked for, guess what….that bridge to nowhere would have become a reality during the Palin administration. She supported the bridge every step of the way…until the funding was cut. So we decided to say, “Thanks, but no thanks. If we want a bridge we’ll build it ourselves?!” Is that like the failed earmark version of “You can’t fire me….I quit!”
The fact that “Thanks, but no thanks” was the money line for her debut as Vice Presidential candidate, and yet is a total fabrication, makes the mind reel. Is there no fact checker on McCain’s staff?
:rofl: