Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Palin's pregnancy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:35 PM
Original message
Sarah Palin's pregnancy
A new member has excellent information on Sarah Palin's Down's syndrome baby, Trig. This post is a pointer to his post. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3894004

The new member is solowannabee. See his response (#11). He provides extensive quotes from a neighbor who raises questions about parenting responsibility, who's gonna get stuck with the kids, and being pregnant at the same time as her 16-yr old daughter... and more. An excerpt appears below:

I do not have enuf posts to start my own thread, so please start one for me with this info.


from the comments on this blog:
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/08/30/off-to-the-lan ...


Sue Williams, commentor claiming to live near Palin and know here says baby is Sarah Palin's and that the oldest daughter is still pregnant and just got married.


Here are some of her comments:



Sue Williams (12:31:50) :

To the person who commented on Sarah’s hair - no, it’s what happens when one has hair extensions - which Sarah, at one time, don’t know about now, had.

Re: babygate - I don’t know what’s being reported. Here, however, is the truth. Trig is Sarah and Todd’s baby.

When Sarah first learned she was pregnant, it was shocking and overwhelming. While she and Todd had not planned to have anymore children, it is common knowledge among their family and friends that neither of them ever surgically insured that they wouldn’t have any “late in life” surprises/blessings.

This, to me, showed a disturbing lack of judgement. If you want to ask the citizens of a state to let you run the state for four years, to me she and Todd should have thought ahead and determined that the possibility of an unplanned pregnancy wouldn’t have been prudent for either the child, their family, their extended family (who are the ones who end up helping them raise their current four children) or the citizens of the state.

They either didn’t think this through, or didn’t care. Not sure. But, either way, to me and to others, it was a lack of foresight and judgement.

But it is the same vein - this lack of judgement - Sarah showed, on the campaign trail for governor, when asked who would raise her children should she win, she promptly stated that Todd would quit his job and stay at home with the kids (Todd works a “Slope” week on/week off schedule).

Sarah was elected and then - whoops. Todd didn’t like the stay at home gig - so Sarah, citing they needed money for the kid’s college (even though Track enlisted in the military) said Todd was returning to work. When asked about her statements on the campaign trail about how Todd would quit his job, Sarah said she’d actually never talked to him about what they would do if she was elected (in terms of his employment) and that she’d spoken out of turn when she spoke for him stating he’d quit his job.

Again, call me picky, but this is the kind of bizarre judgement Sarah routinely displays. Are you kidding me that she would run for governor and she and her husband would somehow not think to have a conversation about what to do with their four school aged kids? That’s insane. So, either her judgement is super goofy, or she wasn’t telling the truth. Either way, it’s not reassuring to now think this is someone who would be one 72 year old heartbeat away from having to call shots for the country/world.

So Todd trots himself back to work and Sarah is busy traipsing around the state and the nation. The kids are “farmed out” (this is the word used by thier associates in “the Valley”) to family and friends to raise while Todd and Sarah are off having their respective careers (Sarah is famously quoted as saying, “My mom does whatever I need her to”).

During this period is when Bristol, Sarah’s sixteen year old daughter, turns up pregnant. So, it’s kind of interesting to note that the Republican Vice Presidential Nominee and her sixteen year old junior in high school unwed daughter were carrying babies at the same time. Once Bristol’s condition became more obvious this summer, she was whisked out of sight and hasn’t been seen in public until yesterday in Ohio. This is why Trig’s blanket was strung across her entire abdomen and torso, but, when she walked down the stairs from the stage, in a profile shot, it was very clear to see she is well into her third trimester of her pregnancy.

It has come out in the past couple of days that she and her high school boyfriend had a quickie wedding and that she is home schooling her senior year.

The Anchorage Daily News has known about this for months - and haven’t touched the story. But I can’t imagine the national press or the Democratic Party will be as willing to turn a blind eye.

For me, once again it speaks to judgement. We all - every single one of us - even Sarah’s closest friends in the Valley (I know, I’ve been speaking to them) know she is in no way qualified for this position. At all.

But then, why would she accept the nomination, knowing that Bristol’s situation will come to light and knowing her hunger for national and international acclaim and attention will carry with it a mighty high price for her seventeen year old daughter who had absent parents last year and who turned up pregnant.

How embarrassing will it be for Bristol once the news (or the baby) comes out and not just the Valley, not just Alaska, not just the USA - but Bristol will be known the world over as the seventeen year old unwed - then quickly wed senior-in-high-school-homeschooled-teenage mom and daughter to the Republican Vice Presidential Nominee?

How hard will that degree of scrutiny and shame be?

How does one do that to one’s daughter?

How does one dash about the country for the next 66 days trying to pull off an image of the devoted mother of five when she, by and large, isn’t the one raising them and when one of them - her daughter, is in a truly vulnerable point in life; not to say anything about the needs of Trig. But maybe he doesn’t count, except as a talking point or a photo prop. But this is a person, a little boy who is going to require a tremendous amount of time and attention. From his mother.

This is okay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well That Would Be Something
But how do we know that Sue Williams isn't KKKarl's screen name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, Fuck, ANOTHER ONE?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Check your PM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's THEIR business - we have more important things to worry about - like REAL ISSUES! -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Actually, it's my business. The woman is an outright liar. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. That and she wants to control my daughter's uterus (mine was removed)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let the National Enquirer deal with the story.
Troopergate should be the focus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. So, you're his wing man?
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 09:52 PM by TexasObserver
Dog, meet Pony.

And now, please continue the Dog and Pony Show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I was figuring Mutt and Jeff, or Abbot and Costello, or Riggs and Murdoch,
but Dog and Pony works, too....

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Dumb and Dumber
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. LOL....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. "So, what you're saying is ... I still have a chance!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. !
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Lewis & Martin. Or, Rowan & Martin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good grief....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is getting more and more obvious. Keep dangling that shiny bait!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for posting in a separate thread - I would have missed this otherwise.
There's definitely something fishy going on and it speaks directly to Palin's honesty and values (or rather, to the lack there of).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Quotes from 'a neighbor?'
Why waste good typing on this crap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. WTF is this shit?
What the hell is going on with DU today? Any DUers who actually know if there is something skanky going on, please let me know by PM. I'm ignoring this thread, as I have already done with about fifty others today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC