Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has there been discussion about Palin's TransCanada problem?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AkFemDem Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:15 PM
Original message
Has there been discussion about Palin's TransCanada problem?
Maybe there has been and I have missed it but I think this is bigger than the pregnant daughter lifetime movie channel story personally, because it's all 100% verifiable. This article touches on problems with this speculative deal but google and you will find the other problems include running our gas pipeline through a foreign country and losing jobs to Canada.


http://www.adn.com/front/story/482027.html
Leading the opposition to the TransCanada license was Senate President Lyda Green, a fellow Republican from Palin's hometown of Wasilla who in June abruptly ended her re-election campaign, saying her constituents had turned against her over Palin's pipeline plan.

Green predicted Friday the state license won't lead to TransCanada building a pipeline. She added that she didn't see the lopsided Senate vote as a personal defeat.

"It's just how people feel," she said. "They've been drawn to a conclusion I don't agree with."

Palin, who needed overwhelming support from Democrats to win the TransCanada vote, said in her press conference that the state never before had "commitments to build this line. Now we do."

That's incorrect.

TransCanada has not promised to actually build the gas line, one of the state's grandest and most frustrated economic development dreams.

The state license, awarded under the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act, or AGIA, which the Legislature passed at Palin's request last year, is not a construction contract and does not guarantee a pipeline will be built.

Rather, it's an exclusive deal under which the state will provide up to $500 million plus other incentives, such as a coordinator to speed up permits, in exchange for TransCanada doing its best to secure the customers, financing, and U.S. and Canadian regulatory clearances to build a line supplying not only Lower 48 gas consumers but Alaskans too.

If all goes according to plan, TransCanada wants to have the Alaska gas line up and running by late 2018.

However, if the current trend of high natural gas prices were to collapse, that could doom a gas line, the staggering cost of which has kept North Slope gas locked in the ground for more than 30 years.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. My company, which will build anything for anybody . . .
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 09:30 PM by MrModerate
(with a few FCPA-related exceptions) refused to get involved with this job because it stinks too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I saw something about the pipeline on 60 Minutes
It would be way shorter than going through Alaska and cost only a fraction of what a pipe through Alaska would cost. The Alaska route is favored by many because they want the cash it will bring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC