blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:31 PM
Original message |
So, as Gustav turns out to be a run-of-the-mill major hurricane... |
|
does McCain lose points for his erractic overreaction?
And before you flame me for lulling people into a false sense of security: I'm sitting here in Baton Rouge, so kindly back off, please.
|
ChimpersMcSmirkers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I was wondering the same thing, and I'm not sure. |
|
I think McKeating5 did the right thing for tommorrow. It wouldn't be too cool for him if it was business as usual at the RNC as NO flooded. So I'd guess it doesn't hurt or help.
Keep safe!
|
blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. yeah, that's probably about right. And thanks for the well wishes.... |
|
We should be okay--but you never know about falling trees and stuff. It's pretty clear that it won't be a big water event, though--except in Houma and Morgan City.
|
totodeinhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Shoot, it hasn't even made landfall yet. I wouldn't underestimate if I were you. |
|
They are saying that it could still have a very strong storm surge although the wind speeds have gone down a bit.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
3. You are upset that it's run of the mill? |
|
Many of us have been praying that it turns into a tropical storm so that people don't die this time. I'm quite happy McCain and Shrubby and "them all" have erred on the side of caution unlike their last reaction to Katrina which was to ignore it because it "might be overreaction".
|
blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Didn't say that. In fact I suggested that I'm glad it's not going to be a disaster... |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 10:40 PM by blitzen
(glad, for obvious reasons), and I implied that I was upset at the GOP for politicizing the weather.
By the way, you ignored my wish not to be flamed.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
you must know a lot about flaming. I would have never thought that asking you to be honest was flaming.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It's back up to Cat 3. nt |
Emit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I have family in NO that evacuated to Baton Rouge |
|
what are y'all expecting down there? My mother was concerned and we were looking on line for info -- showed her the maps, etc. but thought I'd ask to get a first hand account. Other family members went on up to Arkansas -- we have family there, too.
|
blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. In most of Baton Rouge, there is little chance of major flooding... |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 11:13 PM by blitzen
High winds and possible tornadoes will cause random damage. But it certainly won't be a widespread disaster here. If your family is in a good structure and not in a floodplain, they are extremely likely to be just fine. We have experienced Andrew, Katrina, and Rita here. Lots of fallen trees, power out (up to a week during Andrew), but very few casualities.
|
Emit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
20. Thanks, that's pretty much what we expected -- not that that's *good* news |
|
so to speak. My cousin's daughter is there with two little kids at her in-laws -- I'm sure they'll take good care of her.
My thoughts are with you and yours
|
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Hmm...Wait about six hours before you down-play Gustav |
|
It is undergoing an eyewall replacement cycle. Should be done in a couple of hours. After that it will rapidly strengthen.
|
yourguide
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. it's replacing that eyewall a bit faster than expected |
blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. It's the storm surge that would be worrisome...But they're not predicting much more |
|
than 6 ft in NO and maybe 14 max in Houma-Morgan City. There will be some nasty stuff in the latter area, but no way will it be a castrophe like Katrina.
|
yourguide
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. yeah but you're forgetting the 10 foot waves... |
blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
23. A lot of marshy wetland before you get to any population... |
|
Waves would be a factor if there were any "shore," in the classic sense, in Louisiana (Grand Isle being one of the only populated exceptions). The Mississipi shore, with its beaches, got annihilated by the combo of surge and waves in Katrina.
|
yourguide
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. I think you might be surprised. It will be on the NE quadrant |
|
40% of the pumps are failing, and the levees on the west bank are expected to fail. I would expect to see some flooding. Hope I'm wrong, if the eye moves further west it will be better but if it stays on course...
Houma will be hit hard.
|
blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
30. Would the west bank levees fail with a 6 foot surge? |
|
I read somewhere that they could handle 8 feet. And so far tonight it seems like 6 is the max number being bandied about by the NHC.
|
yourguide
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
31. Seems borderline, there was an article a couple of days ago... |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 11:27 PM by yourguide
“Lafitte, Grand Isle and the east side of the Harvey Canal are our most vulnerable areas, but nowhere in the West Bank should be considered a protected area in a Category 3 or greater storm,” said Deano Banano, director Jefferson Parish Emergency Preparedness. http://www.wwltv.com/topstories/stories/wwl082808mlwestbank.204cd2f0.html
|
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
22. Yep. I would be shocked it it isn't a very high 3, low 4 at the 1AM update. |
yourguide
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
32. I think it stays cat 3 |
|
but we'll see in the morning...
|
Hissyspit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:47 PM
Response to Original message |
10. What in the world is a run-of-the-mill major hurricane? |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 10:48 PM by Hissyspit
People thought Katrina was turning out not to be too bad, but then...
Anyway, here is something from Frank Luntz and the Rethug spin. Take it with a big grain of salt:
Politico Playbook: McCain camp watches CNN, not Fox; Pollster says folks want convention to go on Mike Allen Politico Article Last Updated: 08/31/2008 09:43:13 PM CDT
Frank Luntz, a pollster and message consultant, rounded up 25 independent voters from the Twin Cities area for a focus group conducted behind one-way mirrors, within a baseball's throw of the Mall of America. Luntz wasn't surprised that, reflecting the mood of the nation, the participants were "very depressed and sad."
But what did blow him away about the research, conducted for AARP, was his discovery that not one of the voters — "the salt of the earth," he called them — thought the convention should be cut short. "They believe that you need to respect the suffering of others, and seek to help them," Luntz said, "but we are a democracy, and the convention should continue."
Fallout: Although it's a little morbid to think about, Republican officials say their radically curtailed convention offers a political opportunity for John McCain to show leadership and step out of President Bush's shadow once and for all. "You don't wish for it, but it shows McCain dealing with a surprise — a big event that has consequences on people," a convention planner said. "It's redemption for the Republican Party on the competence issue. The convention ends up being about John McCain showing the best way to serve a cause greater than yourself."
|
blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. interesting that even a Luntz focus group would give this result....It's a |
|
good sign than the electorate is less easily manipulated than we might fear.
|
FVZA_Colonel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. I had no doubt they'd try to manipulate it. |
|
Now we have to wait and see how successful things will be.
|
Bluenorthwest
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
12. McCain's reaction is already erractic... |
|
compared to his pre Katrina cake walk. Same goes for the whole of the GOP. During Katrina they were all off fund raising and shoe shopping. Sturmming the git-fiddle. Now, my lord they can not even meet in public, the storm is so important. Remember how it was all the fault of Nagin and Landreau not sending the right papers? Rembemer all the crap said by Rush and the rest of that creepy party? Remember Brownie? From utter contempt and neglect to human suffering after Katrina to this 'clear the decks' routine they are playing now is very erratic. Bi-polar actually. Insane even.
|
juajen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
27. I believe you mean Kathleen Babineaux Blanco, not Mary Landreau. |
|
Yes, Kathleen was much maligned by the pugs, and lost reelection because of it. She was a wonderful democrat from my fair city.
|
Bluenorthwest
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
|
The first and middle names I never knew, to be honest. And her being maligned was terrible but not my point. My point was that they did nothing last time, and in fact blamed everyone who did anything at all. This time they can not even convene, last time they went about business as usual while people drowned. That in itself is erratic. Even if Gustav is 'normal' or whatever odd word you used. And gee, can you name the Gov of my state w/o Google? Even with out his middle name? I doubt it. How about our previous govenor?
|
Erin Elizabeth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I *totally* don't blame people in the area |
|
for evacuating, taking whatever measures they need to and can.
But yeah, it's going to look kind of silly that the president, Vice President, and presumptive nominee decided to go to Texas to monitor things and skip their own convention.
Also, I heard Ah-nold is skipping the convention, too. Lord, that's going to look more like a funeral in Minnesota!
|
blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
21. yes, I share your view. The evacuation was definitely the right thing.... |
|
(and lots of folks in the South Louisiana coastal areas literally were saved by leaving), but the GOP's obsession with this storm has been pathological.
|
Erin Elizabeth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. Have you been hearing about these guys on the shrimp boats |
|
who refuse to leave their boats?
Damn. That's just a death wish. They're saying only about 5% of the NO population is staying. That's at least better than last time, by a lot!
Stay safe!
|
blitzen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
28. Yes, I heard something about it. There always seems to be a few |
|
stubborn (or very misguided) ones. The hurricane prof guy from LSU was on CNN a bit earlier, predicting 100 deaths--people who refused to leave the coastal wetland areas. He tends to exaggerate somewhat--let's hope that's the case this time.
|
TheDonkey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message |
19. hopefully it'll drop down to cat 2 or cat 1 |
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message |
25. This last pic is not good... |
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
29. Ooooooohhh.... You hot-linked from the government. |
|
I'm telling!!!
:rofl:
And yes, it does not look good. The eyewall is becoming more symmetrical. AKA, higher wind potential.
|
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
33. Second major run-of-the-mill hurricane in three years. yikes. Climate change, anyone? nt |
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-31-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. Then there was Rita, Wilma, Emily |
|
All fives at one point or another...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |