Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2005: Alaska's DPS interview/questioning of both Palins about the brother in law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 10:57 PM
Original message
2005: Alaska's DPS interview/questioning of both Palins about the brother in law
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 11:02 PM by rainbow4321
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is much worse than hiding a baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for posting these links! Source materials always an excellent thing.
The abovetopsecret.com link looks like one to book mark. Seems fair handed, well researched and documented material on troopergate.

GREAT catch rainbow4321! Hearty K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. My pleasure....
The documentation may just help us get a background on what all this troopergate is about. Up until, what, 3 days ago, it was a local Alaskan story.

Now that it has been officially announced that Palin has lawyered up, it may be time to go over her & her family's questioning/interviews by local law enforcement.

Granted she was not gov when these questioning sessions were going on but any inconsistancies between what she said THEN and what she says NOW need to be highlighted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zuul9 Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. This needs to be investigated further!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The big question is
Palin was in into this up to her eyeballs in 2005...was she able to put on the her brakes and withdraw any involvement after she was sworn in??

She is supposed to be deposed sometime soon.

And the guy she fired claims to have emails from her but he won't dicuss them right now because of the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't it strange that they obviously believe that mcbush could not win with
the fundies which is why she was brought in? they are not hardly even talking about him, isn't he supposed to be the top dog?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC