Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 12:55 AM
Original message |
If McCain had chosen RON PAUL?? |
|
Would it have been a better pick? I think so. Still a losing ticket, but a much better one than his new secretary, what's her name.... Moneypenny?
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message |
1. A lot of DUers rather like that bigot. |
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. So do a lot of Republicans and Independents |
|
A hekufa lot more than like Miss Moneypenny.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. I suspect they don't realize his full views or they wouldn't /nt |
rabbits4love
(73 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
its true that we do share some of the same issues/values... when it comes to protecting and enforcing the constitution... but beyond that ...we share absolutely nothing...
if they had it their way, wed all be left to starve and die on our own with no help from the government for anything whatsoever...
|
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
16. I like his position on the drug war and that's about it |
endthewar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
22. You'd probably like his foreign policy views as well |
|
You don't get more anti-Iraq War than with Ron Paul. He's also a heavy critic of the Bush administration on many issues, especially on reckless spending increasing the national debt.
|
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. No his foreign policy is fucking crazy |
|
He wants to leave the UN and return to isolationism. We may agree about pulling out of Iraq but not for the same reasons.
|
Sherman A1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
19. Sweeping Generalization. |
|
Is it like him or like SOME of the things he says? I agree with him on Iraq and a few other points I disagree with him on most everything, I do enjoy seeing him poke the Republican party in the ribs on a regular basis.
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. Ron Paul supporters noted. Thanks. |
endthewar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
It was clear that he should have won the Republican Party's nomination if it had been an even, unbiased fight. FOX News and the Republican Party decided to throw him under the bus because he refused to back the Iraq War and he actually made great sense stating his views and excoriating his opponents. They labeled him a 9/11-truther just because he said that they should read the 9/11 Commission Report to realize that we can't just go around starting wars like the Iraq War and not have any backlash.
|
Arrowhead2k1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I don't know about a better pick, but it would have been just as crazy. |
|
McCain has showed us that anything is possible when you're a thoughtless power-hungry prick.
|
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. I tend to think it would have accomplished the same thing |
|
Only it would string along the independents and the libertarians instead of the evangelicals. I wonder if they might be able to replace that contingent with these three other groups. After all, the fundies are pesky to deal with.
|
davepc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:00 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Liberman would of been best. 1/2 the convention would of walked out on him. |
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. but but but they would win MASSACHUSETTS!!! OMFG!! |
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:01 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Ron Paul would not have accepted because of his position on the war /nt |
eshfemme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Ron Paul would have refused. |
|
He hates McCain and for all his crazy ideas, I'm pretty confident in his not selling out his principles since being McCain's VP actually entails selling McCain's "plans" and positions.
|
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
18. I hope so, and perhaps that's how McCain got to Palin |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 02:24 AM by Cronus Protagonist
A-O on his short list probably already refused, so he got lucky right before he had to ask Pawlenty or Ron Paul,
|
endthewar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
21. Paul was the most principled man in the race in the primaries, either side |
|
Yeah, he would have turned him down. He still hasn't endorsed McCain yet and if you listen to his message, McCain is even worse for this country than Obama. Ron Paul tells his supporters not to fall for McCain's BS on earmarks, because McCain would just transfer the spending power from the legislative to the executive branch.
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:07 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Ron Paul to McGrumpy::: FUCK YOU....get fuckin LOST |
rabbits4love
(73 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message |
11. i agree with the two above me |
|
he never would have taken it.
if he had though, it probably would have pissed off another segment of the republicans.
It would have been nice if Bob Barr and him would have ran together on the Lib ticket.. nice in the sense of all the disaffected republicans going to vote for them... woulda put the nader effect to shame
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Would have scared the shit out of me |
|
But he made a fool out of McCain at the debates and I have that video.
|
lurky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Ron Paul would have to pretend to agree with McCain |
|
on the Iraq war, civil liberties, immigration, and pretty much every other core principle that he holds (right or wrong). I just don't see Paul keeping his mouth shut about how stupid the war is.
|
autorank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 02:06 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Paul would have said no. |
|
He's got a counter rally going in MN. The Paulis view McCain as bought and sold by just about everybody with enough money.
But, yes, it would have been better than this.
She's truly a nut.
|
Indi Guy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 02:10 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Ron Paul would have publicly declined the invitation n/t |
phleshdef
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Ron Paul would have said no. Cmon, he is nuts but Dennis Kucinich is one of his closest friends. |
|
And like Kucinich, he enjoys and believes in his position as an outsider.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:35 PM
Response to Original message |