Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Candidates' kids are OFF LIMITS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:12 PM
Original message
Candidates' kids are OFF LIMITS
Say whatever you want about the candidates.

But leave the kids alone!

Palin's daughter, and for that matter, the entire Palin family, deserves our compassion and support. At this point, i don't care about the governor's politics. This is a very difficult and private family matter, so please just back off the personal attacks and focus on the issues.

Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, tell that to Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I wish families were off limits -- but what if Chelsea had gotten pregnant as a teen??? OMG! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Exactly.
Who on here thinks republican would say "she should be off-limits, she is just a kid."
LOL.LOL.LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Chelsea whose father is Janet Reno? That Chelsea?
Yea that works!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
45. Bingo!
McCain is the worst kind of hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trueblue2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't agree.
When a parent makes a stand and in their own lives, they are hypocritical, the truth needs to come out.

Are we all supposed to bury our heads in the sand? Bury the news? I don't agree with the original poster at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Especially because the party of "family values" MAKES it our business!
Before today, the GOP was quite willing to sell Sarah as a good leader due to her "mothering" skillz--now they want us to back off? Hypocrisy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. You don't care about her politics??
Then why are you posting on a POLITICAL board?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. Oh the maturity police!
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndreaCG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tell that to John McCain who called 12 year old Chelsea the "White House dog"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Did He Really? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
50. No that was Rush. McCain said that Janet Reno was Chelsea's father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yours is like the 20th post on this. No one is slamming the kids. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
40. You haven't read the posts. Even in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. HElp me out then--find a couple of posts where something negative is being said
about Bristol herself.

I see several people saying the kids aren't off limits, but I haven't seen any yet where Bristol is being directly attacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. tic-tic-tic...still waiting? tic-tic-tic
Hope your not holding your breath!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. No chance.
She helped create this hell we live in, where people's personal lives are scruitinized and judged. She can bloody well face it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shows what kind of family the Palin family is
These people who are trying to force their heavenly values on the rest of us while their own kids can't even follow the mold get no pity from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. McCain said that Chelsea Clinton was Janet Reno's kid
Shove your faux outrage up yours!

What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onetwo Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. If not for all of the rumor-mongering, we wouldn't have the gift we got this morning.
I think it's time to stop listening to the hand-wringers and "we're better than them"-ers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not when the candidate's whole purpose of being on the ticket is to spread "family values"
Her ability to spread that ideal among her own brood is very very relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. what is not off limits is the hypocrisy of the candidates

1) They moralize about family values and the immorality of the "urban family" and there is no difference.

2) She is against sex education in the school and yet refuses to arm her child with what she needs to survive in America as a teenager.

3) She is absolutely irresponsible as a mother by passing a few hundred hospitals in a high risk pregnancy to give birth in Alaska.


These are not rational people and with their connection with the AOG and the AIP without question the worst pick for Vice President in the history of the Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Actually no, This is an issue that goes right to the Core Republican Bullshit.
Abstinence misinformation, women's reproductive health care rights, 'we are the moral godly party', etc. They surround themselves, wrap themselves, in smug better than thou religious moral lone-upsmanship, with the clear message that the other party, that would be us, doesn't know how to raise our own kids, can't keep our peckers in our pants, and wants to hand out birth control to your teenagers, which of course leads directly to pregnancy.

Heck no. We have to be careful to not attack Bristol for what she has done, but we most surely have to attack Republicans for being hypocritical assholes, and this PR disaster is the opening we have been handed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. No it's not
Palin and her cronies are the ones who want abstenance only sex education, and then her very own child proves it doesn't work?

This whole thing just highlights the failure of the Talibornagain policy. Sensible people have to stand up and say ENOUGH to the religious right.

I'm not dissing Palin's daughter, I'm dissing Palin's policies.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. POWs and Mothers of 5 should be OFF LIMITS too!
I don't care what the "issues" are, John McCain served his country and made great sacrifices and Palin is just a Mother of 5 trying to live the American dream so how DARE you continue to bash, trash and utterly destroy these great American heroes?



















:sarcasm:

Two can play this game :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
52. All Republicans are off limits! I don't care what their politics are!
Just lay off the Republicans! They're having a hard time right now. Their convention got all interrupted and something.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Snrk.
Nice try. In fact, Sarah Palin has some serious questions to answer: where was she (and where were those conservative family values of hers) when her underage daughter was having sex out of wedlock and getting herself knocked up? If you're running as a Christian conservative hockey mom (and Palin is), then that's how the voters should judge you. In that regard alone--her alleged strong suit--Palin is a total failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Really?
Since when?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. But her #1 job qualification is her parenting.....As long as my uterus is her business
Her uterus and her daughter's are mine.

When they stop moralizing, I will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Haha..

Amen. Great response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kid is not being attacked

But rather the extreme viewpoint of her mother that put her into this very difficult position.

I feel VERY bad for the girl, because she was obviously poorly informed, poorly educated and as a result is having a baby.

This exposes the folly of abstinence only agendas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. bullshit. Family values = teen pregnancy.
the hypocrisy is undeniable. Not to mention her willingness to expose her daughter to political scrutiny. I've refrained from this debate thus far... but THIS is too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. Correct, but what kind of mother runs for national office, knowing
it will bring all sorts of publicity to her pregnant unwed teenage daughter? I am more concerned about Mom's values, not Bristol's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Edwards ran for Prez thinking he could keep his affair hidden. Palin runs for Veep doing same
mistake, that she can keep something hidden. They both lied!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. But that does not mean the issue of Abstinence v. Contraceptive teaching should be disregarded
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 12:26 PM by TeamJordan23
Apparently, Absitence teaching (which is what Palin wants to do) does not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. Children's behavior reflects on their upbringing. Sorry. Next. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. Then the candidates should not parade their wives, husbands, children, grandchildren
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 12:32 PM by aint_no_life_nowhere
in front of American voters, exploiting them to get votes. I'm all for keeping every family member in the shadows and not using them. I think it's ridiculous in the United States how candidates want us to see what a fucking goody-two-shoes family they have, as if that even remotely qualifies them for office. American politics is all about getting voters to like you because of your dog, your cat, the cat's favorite mouse, the goody-goody family members, what their favorite color is, etc. I don't want to like my President. I want to be overwhelmed with the candidate's intellectual capacities and their stand on the issues (in my case, how progressive they are). I don't care about their private sexual life or their family life. But I say if a candidate gets his/her family involved in the campaign, then it's all fair game. It's all fair game. Why shouldn't it be? The Palin family doesn't deserve even an ounce of my compassion or support. I don't know them and I don't want to know them. But if they are there to pander for votes, and if they are being exploited by the candidate, then all's fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. yeh right...Hey everybody....hands off the Aristocrats !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libby2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
34. Her fucking mother should have thought about that
before she said, "I do."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. Right, Palin deserves our support.
Fuck off clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
36. that's it, then ... stoop down to their level.
It's very sad to see how DU has become a place with so many discompassionate callous people. You've whipped yourselves up into a fanatical frenzied political foam, and seem to be losing touch with your humanity. You've reduced this place, that used to be a forum for intelligent insightful discussions, to gossip central. Some of the critical posts about Palin have been good analysis about her issues and hypocrisy. But the majority of them are simply immature insensitive petty gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
37. The issue should be the mother's judgement. Besides the flight
during labor issue, there is a having children and apparently not being aware of what they're doing issue. There should also be a discussion about Gov. Palin's belief about providing birth control to unmarried women. I'd bet anything she's an "abstinence only" kind of person. We should leave the daughter out of this. It's the mother's judgement in question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. i agree.
Palin's judgment is the main issue and she should be called out on it. But I've been bothered by many of the gloating callous comments that are just plain cruel. There must be some way to discuss these things while displaying a little humanity and consideration for what the family is going through, no matter how hypocritical and politically disagreeable they are.

As much as I don't like Palin and her issues, I still have sympathy for her and her family. Sorry, I can't help it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
38. Sarah Palin made this all public
All she had to do to knock down the rumors was produce a birth certificate. The Alaska papers asked her for one months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. W. That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
42. kids off limits? No more
Repukes were vicious in their comments about 13-year old Chelsea Clinton's looks in 1992.

Fuck 'the we're above that' shit. We are not calling Palin's daughter names; we are pointing out the hypocrisy of the adults around her! There is no such thing as a private family matter anymore when you enter politics. After all, it's the politics of personal destruction that the repukes crafted against Bill Clinton -- and continually used to their winning advantage in the echo chamber of cabal news and hate radio -- against all Dems.

You think if Obama had a 17 year old unwed, pregnant daughter, they wouldn't be all over it like flies on dog shit? They'd be calling her every type of imaginable stereotype and saying if he can't manage his household, how can he manage the nation...

Fuck 'em. Call 'em on their hypocrisy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
44. No, the entire Palin family does NOT deserve our support. SARAH PALIN
thrust her own family into the spotlight by accepting McCain's offer to run for VP.

SHE is responsible for the spotlight on her own daughter. SHE did this to her daughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
46. Really, becuase if you have kids, she wants to tell YOU what the gig will be if they are pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
48. I wonder if you were standing up for Michelle Obama during the rethug onslaught on her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
49. John McCain said that Chelsea Clinton was fathered by Janet Reno.
That kind of off limits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
51. Only dem's kids are not off limits. huh?
What goes around comes around. I wish I could be so fair and just, but this is war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
53. NO. this woman is running on "real mom". it is MOM's job to protect her children
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 01:35 PM by seabeyond
she willingly and selfishly put HER need before her children. she fails on what she is running on. a parent.

and that is NOT about the children. that is ALL about the candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
54. I do care about the Gov.'s politics. This girl's pregnancy may be a direct reflection of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Damian the LHP Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
55. Your CONCERN is noted.
Now begone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. good idea
with the likes of you increasingly dominating DU, it's no longer a place for intelligent empathic discussion. The rabid foaming-at-the-mouth reactions displayed by many people is truly sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
56. Absolutely
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 02:20 PM by loyalsister
Has anyone thought through the unintended consequenses?

Say Obama gets elected. Don't forget there will be 4 years and another election where he has two kids in the WH.

Are the people here who have declared kids fair game going to change the rules?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
57. Palin made "family values" an issue. It therefore deserves to be examined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. Absolutely. If palin was concerned about the spotlight, why did she accept to be mccain's VP /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
59. This has nothing to do with their kids, it has EVERYTHING to do with positions on birth control
sex education, etc.

compassion my ass. They want to appoint judges that will take away the right of privacy between a woman and her doctor

They don't want equal pay for equal work

If she didn't want to be under the spotlight she should have never accepted to be mccain's VP

I am sick and tired of holier than thou attitudes, especially when dealing with this group of thugs and the last 8 years



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
61. Your talking about giving a free pass for a man, man mind you who
is running for a leader of this country who has had no trouble in the past of going after the children, Chelsea ring a bell? sorry, but they put it in play, its not my fault if they cannot handle the same...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
62. Yes, just like Chelsea Clinton.
And Obama's kids will be. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
63. Crock of shite
Palin uses her family as props- they are all public figures. She opely opposes even the most basic rights for my family. I ask you this, OP, where the hell are you when the likes of McCain and Palin attack GLBT families? Where were you when McCain said Janet Reno was Chelsea's dad- also called her ugly, using the word ugly. Where in the name of all that is Demcoratic were you when Rush called Chelsea the family dog, on national TV? McCain is the Republican nominee, he attacked the child of our last President by name and in no uncertain terms. I see no one atttacking this poor besotted girl of Palin's. I see Palin running with a guy who attacked other kids though. Palin seems ok with that, does she not?
And you know what? Palin and her family deserve nothing from me but contempt and hard core opposition. And that is what they will get. Hypocrites and vipers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
64. You can say that all you want, but people are not going to leave her alone
Sarah Palin should have considered her family before running for public office. She is putting her own aspirations and wants ahead of her family's best interest. Greed. There is NO WAY people are NOT going to talk about the pregnant 17 year old daughter of a woman who is against Sex Ed, birth control, and abortions. This woman is a dangerous Fundie, and she will take away your rights if you give her the chance. Don't cry to me when the snake bites you after you've helped it heal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
65. Attacks on parents for their failures when they campaign on their
allegedly pristeen, superior parenting skills are fair game.

The ruckus is now all about Palin's abject failure to give her daughter the necessary skills (solely the parents' duty according to her worldview) to avoid out-of-wedlock or even in-wedlock pregnancy. She failed at the abstinence teaching thing.

FAIR GAME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC