Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin Was a Director of Embattled Sen. Stevens's 527 Group

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:24 PM
Original message
Palin Was a Director of Embattled Sen. Stevens's 527 Group
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/01/palin_was_a_director_of_embatt.html

ST. PAUL -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin began building clout in her state's political circles in part by serving as a director of an independent political group organized by the now embattled Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens.

Palin's name is listed on 2003 incorporation papers of the "Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.," a 527 group that could raise unlimited funds from corporate donors. The group was designed to serve as a political boot camp for Republican women in the state. She served as one of three directors until June 2005, when her name was replaced on state filings.

Palin's relationship with Alaska's senior senator may be one of the more complicated aspects of her new position as Sen. John McCain's running mate; Stevens was indicted in July 2008 on seven counts of corruption.

Palin, an anti-corruption crusader in Alaska, had called on Stevens to be open about the issues behind the investigation. But she also held a joint news conference with him in July, before he was indicted, to make clear she had not abandoned him politically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ooopsie. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's been three days in the hot sun...
The carcass of the McCain Campaign is really starting to stink up the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. great analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Boy is it ever and just think, there's probably more carcasses to be found. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medicswife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. She soooooooooo was NOT vetted.
I think McCain has gone off of what was left of his rocker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. WORST.VETTING. EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. McCain will state that he was in prison camp when Eagleton wasn't vetted properly, in 1972.
McCain will state that he was in prison camp when Eagleton wasn't vetted properly, in 1972. McCain was released in 1973.

Eagleton was announced by George McGovern as his running mate July 14, 1972, but it was soon found that "Between 1960 and 1966, Eagleton checked himself into the hospital three times for physical and nervous exhaustion, receiving electric shock treatments twice." Eagleton withdrew August 1.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Eagleton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. interesting.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's gonna leave a mark!
OUCH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Technically, a skid mark. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc."
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Who needs punch lines, right?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. these jokes just write themselves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. that did make me crack up. Of all names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoris Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R! Now this is a Palin story I care about!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gblady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. boy, it just keeps....
floating to the top...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. NICE!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. Am I off my meds, again??
Nah, I'm not even crazy enough to make this stuff up...


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kicking the most devestating story of the day
Come on guys, this is HUGE. Stevens is under INDICTMENT. Stebvens is the guy that Palin praised for his BRIDGE TO NOWHERE.

Best of all, this story DESTROYS the she's a reformer crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. beginning tomorrow - cable news will be all over Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. Her preggo daughter is the least of her problems!
1. Troopergate!!
2. Bridge-to-Nowhere and her lies about it.
3. She's a Buchananite? So says Pat Buchanan.
4. Hired a guy with a sexual harrassment charge on his resume.
5. Wasthisclose to Senator Ted Stevens.
6. Left Wasilla $20 million in debt because of her incompetent handling of a "must have" Sports Complex.
7. Supported Obama's energy plan!
8. Supported Obama in Alaska -- said she was happy to see him pulling ahead of McCain. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/30/palin-was-excited-that-ob_n_122632.html
9. No birth control for married couples. So in the world of Sarah Palin, all woman would have no choice but to risk getting pregnant whether they want to or not, and women over 40 must risk getting pregnant even though doing so could result in the birth of child with Downs Syndrom or some other birth defect. I guess we can get rid of half the gynecologists since Sarah will be in charge of all medical decisions.

And all this is before she's been properly vetted! Can't wait to see what else crops up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kciking again
DUers need to pay attention to the BIG story.

This one can't get lost in the fray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. Isn't the Inter tubes a wonderful place? K & R (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. Yup. Maverick move. Brave. Gutsy. Insane.
They had boring old Pawlenty, and tossed him aside. They wanted a hottie- and they got her.

They made their choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. are they trying to lose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-01-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Honestly-you have to ask yourself that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC