whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:09 PM
Original message |
Using Obama's admonishment to the press, to control discourse on DU, is BULLSHIT! |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 03:56 PM by ResetButton
We are not the campaign, we are not the press, we are not gonna have you tell us what we can discuss (as long as it conforms to DU rules of course);-)
|
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Who's controlling anything? |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 03:13 PM by Richardo
He wasn't admonishing the press, he asked his supporters to leave the baby issue alone. Therefore I can only assume that those that keep it up do not support him.
There are dozens of real issues to discuss and illuminate that disqualify both McCain and Palin to be President.
|
busymom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
terrya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. I'm glad we have no influence on the Obama campaign. |
|
Seriously.
Goddammit, the people running this campaign are PROS. They know what they're doing. They're not getting anywhere near this stuff and they're absolutely right. And neither should we.
|
jonnyblitz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
liberalmuse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
It means that most of Obama's supporters aren't mindless drones and I don't believe Obama would want us to be. I respect Obama, and his right to completely divorce himself from the lefty blog discourse, as he had absolutely no part in it. I also respect his not wanting his supporters to spread the rumors or cause harm in his name. The fact is, the right wing smear machine loves to be the martyrs, and they have the money and power to spin it that way. Anyway, I've said all I have to say about the breaking news this morning on this. It always comes back to McCain and his bad decision-making.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. This is an internet message board |
|
Bristol Palin's pregnancy is the topic of the day.
If you have a problem with that being discussed then you are free to close your web browser.
|
liberalmuse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The problem seems to be, the right wing are malicious liars. They are trying to blame discourse on the internet as being directly fueled by his campaign. I'm glad he made the statement, but I'm not going to stop expressing my concern that McCain is not fit for the Presidency, and the prospect of Palin becoming VP is absolutely unacceptable.
|
AZBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Oh for the love of all things good, WHERE'S THE IGNORE THREAD BUTTON???!?!? |
|
I can't wait for it to come back!
|
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. I too miss our little grey crossed friend. |
whatchamacallit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. So do actually want to ignore me, or just tell me how much you want to ignore me? |
AZBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
18. Not you, the thread. Any thread about the baby. |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
5. In the immortal words of RATM.... |
|
FUCK YOU I WON'T DO WUTCHA TELL ME!
|
azmouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
10. You can talk about it all you want... |
|
just don't expect that we have to listen.
A lot of us have had ENOUGH of the Palin baby bullshit.
She is wrong for this country for soooo many other reasons.
|
AnotherMother4Peace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Bush/Chaney were always "taking the high road", while their attack dogs (Rush, Rove) spread the LIES |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-01-08 04:09 PM by AnotherMother4Peace
& stirred the crap. These Palin scandals appear to be true - and I think as a nation we need to be informed.
|
AnotherMother4Peace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message |
13. McSame & Palin would like us to quit discussing baby-gate, grandma-gate, trooper-gate, bridge |
|
to nowhere-gate, etc., etc., etc. - Please stop now. :sarcasm:
|
Native
(885 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Admonishing the press? Didn't sound that way to me... |
|
the report I read quoted Obama as saying this: "Our people were not involved in any way in this, and they will not be," he said. "And if I ever thought that there was somebody in my campaign that was involved in something like that, they'd be fired." How did we get from this to admonishment of the press and a clarion call for DUer's to avoid this topic?
|
NoodleyAppendage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Thank you. I'm convinced that some around here a Repuke deep ops. n/t |
RagAss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. I don't think Rep Deep Ops planted the video of Palin.... |
|
Addressing the AIP convention.....That's sedition against the USA. Let's face it...They've got a Lemon on their hands.
|
Stephist
(557 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And god forbid you point out that this is a news story because it points out the hypocrisy of Sarah Palin. That REALLY sets the moderator acting, 1st amendment haters off
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Indeed. Could we have "GD:Blinders" forum?! |
|
That way, all the posters who daily plead for the rest of us to join them in wearing blinders could have their very forum. They could exhort each other daily NOT to think about anything that might upset ANYONE in the forum, because the most important thing is always: YOU DON'T GO THERE!
Doesn't matter where "THERE" is. Just don't go there.
GD:Blinders ... for the weak kneed.
|
Stephist
(557 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I REALLY hate having to use Ignore |
|
But there comes a time when I have to put all of folks who either believe they are the real supporters or just know what I should or shouldn't type in their rightful place.
|
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |
22. That was Bill Bennett's approach... using Obama's statement to admonish CNN ... |
|
... for daring to bring up the subject of abstinence-only education.
|
Virginia Dare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-01-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message |
23. This is supposedly a forum for an underground political movement.. |
|
not associated with any particular campaign. There's nothing wrong with fishing around and causing trouble.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |